The orthogonal projection has range , not all of : the latter is an infinite-dimensional vector space whereas is a finite-dimensional vector space. For a concrete counterexample, cannot belong to any finite-degree piecewise polynomial space, since all its derivatives are nonzero on every open interval. For , the B-splines are continuous, so the orthogonal projection is a map . For order one it instead has a generally discontinuous piecewise constant range. For example, a single interval indicator on is the projection of the constant function one onto its span, and is not continuous.
Write . Since is a positive scalar multiple of , the operator normal equations are equivalent toThe mixed-normalization spline Gram matrix is invertible: where and is the ordinary positive-definite matrix of inner products of a linearly independent basis. The positivity and unit-integral normalization of a B-spline give . The subpartition of unity for B-splines givesHere the operator norm of a matrix on is its maximum absolute row sum. Consequently,This proves the maximum-norm bound for spline projection.
For on an equidistant spline knot sequence, is the triangular hat with value one at and support . Its slopes on the two pieces are and , and . Direct integration givesNonadjacent hats have disjoint interiors of their supports, so their inner product vanishes. Dividing by therefore givesThis linear-spline mixed Gram matrix is tridiagonal. Every diagonal entry is , including the first and last: the distinct-knot hats have their full supports inside . End rows simply lack one off-diagonal neighbor; there are no repeated endpoint spline knots here.
A strict diagonal dominance argument proves the estimate even on a nonuniform strictly increasing spline knot sequence. Put . Then has a rising piece of length and a falling piece of length , while . The same integrations as in part (b) give the linear-spline mixed Gram matrixOnly entries with indices in are present. Thus in every row.
For , choose an index with . The reverse triangle inequality then yieldsHence . Applying this to every provesThis is the inverse infinity-norm bound from diagonal dominance; no total positivity theorem is needed. The proof also gives invertibility directly by taking .
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.