The sign convention makes this a defocusing semilinear wave equation:Its wave energy includes a nonnegative potential term:For a smooth function solution, finite propagation speed preserves compact support on finite time intervals. Differentiate under the integral and use integration by parts:Equivalently the local conservation law has density and flux . All three terms are nonnegative, and forces both Cauchy data to vanish. Hence this is a positive conserved energy, rather than the indefinite energy associated with the opposite sign.
We use the homogeneous version of the Sobolev embedding theorem in three dimensions:Here homogeneous Sobolev space is the completion of compactly supported smooth functions in the L2 norm of the gradient, identified with its representative. Apply this Sobolev inequality both to and to its spatial derivatives.
LetThe Plancherel theorem identifies the L2 norm of the Hessian matrix with , because . In particular,Differentiating the defocusing semilinear wave equation gives . By the Holder inequality with exponents and , the preceding Sobolev inequality, and conservation of the positive wave energy,Use the inhomogeneous wave energy estimate simultaneously for the three spatial derivatives. It givesThe Gronwall inequality therefore yields . We may take the continuous, locally bounded functionThe constant is universal; the dependence on the initial data is only through and . The H2 bound for the defocusing cubic wave equation holds on every existing smooth interval, without assuming the global conclusion. If or , the zero solution satisfies the same estimate.
The opposite sign is the focusing semilinear wave equation . Begin with a spatially constant solution, reducing the partial differential equation to the ordinary differential equation . Substitution of givesFor a nonzero profile, equality of powers and coefficients gives and . ChooseTo obtain compact support, take a smooth cutoff function equal to one on and zero outside , and prescribeThese are smooth, compactly supported Cauchy data. By finite propagation speed, the local solution agrees with throughout for , where is its maximal forward smooth existence time.
For completeness, the semilinear domain of dependence assertion follows by comparing two solutions: their difference obeys , with . On any compact time interval before on which the solutions are smooth, is bounded in the backward light cone. Add to the shrinking-ball wave energy; its derivative is bounded above by times that energy, with the same nonpositive boundary flux. Zero initial difference and the Gronwall inequality give there.
If , the identity at the origin would imply as , contradicting smoothness at . ThusIf the solution loses regularity earlier, that is already finite-time blowup. The usual smooth continuation criterion for semilinear wave equations precludes a finite maximal time with all continuation norms bounded. This localized ordinary differential equation blowup for a wave equation therefore supplies the required compactly supported examples.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.