The model assumes a static plane-parallel atmosphere, separate grey stellar and thermal bands with constant opacities, local thermodynamic equilibrium for thermal emission, negligible scattering, and transport by radiative transfer rather than convection. The Eddington closure approximation sets the thermal angular-moment ratio to , and the upper boundary supplies the usual term. Treating the incoming radiation with representative direction cosine gives its attenuation . Intrinsic flux enters from below, while the imposed external stellar flux is absorbed from above.
With constant gravity and hydrostatic equilibrium, , allowing conversion to an atmospheric pressure-temperature profile. This last relation additionally assumes constant thermal opacity. The grey treatment describes the energy balance approximately; it does not resolve individual molecular absorption lines.
The thermal optical depth increases inward, so an atmospheric thermal inversion requires . Differentiating the semi-grey irradiated atmosphere profile gives
Therefore the inversion criterion with intrinsic planetary flux is
An inverted layer exists at the top precisely when
For , it extends over
provided the logarithm is positive. Otherwise the profile has no inverted interval. For a strongly irradiated hot Jupiter, and the threshold is approximately ; the intrinsic flux eventually restores an inward-increasing temperature at greater depth.
Large visible absorption opacity deposits stellar heat high in the exoplanet atmosphere. Gas-phase titanium monoxide and vanadium monoxide are candidate absorbers in sufficiently hot layers. An atmospheric cold trap or other condensate loss can remove them, while sufficiently high temperature and vigorous mixing can help keep them in the gas. The condition concerns absorbing opacity: highly reflective scattering alone does not deposit the required heat.
For uniform composition, the Schwarzschild criterion gives stability against convection when
A parcel displaced upward expands approximately adiabatically. If the ambient logarithmic temperature gradient is shallower than the adiabatic temperature gradient, the parcel cools more than its surroundings, becomes denser, and sinks back. Equality is neutral stability; a steeper gradient drives buoyant growth.
For a diatomic ideal gas with active translational and rotational degrees of freedom, and . If the infrared opacity is constant, , so the profile's radiative temperature gradient is
An atmospheric thermal inversion has negative and is stable by this criterion. Composition gradients require the Ledoux criterion; molecular dissociation and changing heat capacities can also change the numerical adiabatic temperature gradient.
Take to increase inward, so the positive coefficient describes an inward-increasing temperature. Constant gravity and hydrostatic equilibrium give , hence
Matching the radiative temperature gradient to the adiabatic temperature gradient gives the formal local boundary relation
The same result follows from radiative diffusion: for constant upward thermal flux and Rosseland mean opacity , .
There is an important limitation to treating as constant over the entire radiative layer. Integration from an irradiated outer boundary gives
For a diatomic ideal gas, , so this profile cannot actually reach a radiative-convective boundary. Formally, imposing a constant would give
which is positive only for . A finite boundary for a normal molecular atmosphere requires additional opacity, flux, or thermodynamic variation. The local matching formula is usable near a real boundary, but constant is not a complete global model of it. This is the convective stability of a constant-opacity irradiated atmosphere.
For the intended order-of-magnitude scaling, suppose the local values of and are comparable for Jupiter and a hot Jupiter, and assume scales with planetary equilibrium temperature. Equal absorbed-flux factors around the same stellar luminosity give . Taking and a representative close-in orbit yields
This illustrates how irradiation can push a boundary much deeper. It is a conditional estimate calibrated from the supplied reference, not a self-consistent prediction of the globally constant- model. Different intrinsic cooling flux, opacity, gravity, or atmospheric metallicity of a giant planet can substantially alter it.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.