The Nielsen–Schreier theorem says that every subgroup of a free group is free. Realize as the fundamental group of the rose , the graph with one vertex and oriented loops. A subgroup of finite index of a subgroup corresponds to a connected -sheeted covering graph . The graph has vertices and unoriented edges. Choosing a spanning tree leaves
edges outside the tree, and these freely generate . Thus the Nielsen–Schreier formula is
Take the free abelian group , whose rank of a group is two, and its finite-index subgroup . The subgroup has index two and is again isomorphic to , so its rank is two. The Nielsen–Schreier formula would instead give . Hence
is a counterexample.
Let be the rank of a group, let be a generating set of size , and suppose . Choose a Schreier transversal adapted to a spanning tree in the Schreier coset graph. By Schreier's lemma, is generated by the elements
There are candidates. The oriented edges in the spanning tree give trivial candidates, leaving at most . This proves the Schreier index-rank inequality
Let have a generating set of a group with elements. Every subgroup of index gives a transitive group action of on the left cosets of , hence a group homomorphism after the cosets are labelled. Conversely, is the stabilizer subgroup of one point in this action.
A homomorphism is determined by the images of the generators, so there are at most such homomorphisms and at most point stabilizers. Therefore the finiteness of subgroups of a fixed finite index gives only finitely many subgroups of index .
For a finite generating set of , the Cayley graph has vertex set and an edge from to for every and ; one may retain orientations and labels, or forget them.
As unlabelled undirected graphs, the Cayley graph of the infinite cyclic group with generator and the Cayley graph of the infinite dihedral group
with generators are both the two-way infinite line. The first group is an abelian group and the second is not, so they are not isomorphic. Thus the requested example is the infinite line as a Cayley graph of and .
A map is a quasi-isometry if there are and such that
for all , and every point of lies within distance of . The Milnor–Švarc lemma says that a group acting properly discontinuously, cocompactly and isometrically on a proper geodesic metric space is finitely generated, and each orbit map from a word metric is a quasi-isometry.
Now let be finite generating sets of . Put
Replacing each letter in an -word by a -word and conversely gives
Thus the identity map is a bilipschitz equivalence, hence a quasi-isometry. All finite generating sets of a finitely generated group give quasi-isometric Cayley graphs.
Suppose first that is a -quasi-isometry. If , the lower quasi-isometry inequality gives
so the kernel of a group homomorphism lies in the finite word-metric ball of radius and is finite. Coarse surjectivity gives an such that every is within of . The finite ball therefore contains representatives for every coset of , so is finite.
Conversely, suppose is finite and is a finite-index subgroup of . The map factors as
The first arrow is a finite-kernel quotient quasi-isometry, the middle arrow is an isomorphism of finitely generated groups, and the last arrow is a finite-index subgroup quasi-isometry. Their composition is a quasi-isometry. Hence the quasi-isometry criterion for a group homomorphism is
Yes. Take . The free product satisfies
A connected three-sheeted cover of the two-petal rose has fundamental group of rank by the Nielsen–Schreier formula. Thus is isomorphic to an index-three subgroup of . A finite-index subgroup quasi-isometry then gives
For a locally finite discrete metric space with basepoint , the growth function of a discrete metric space is
In a Cayley graph, left multiplication by is a graph isometry carrying to any other vertex . It therefore gives a bijection for every . Thus the growth function of a fixed Cayley graph is exactly independent of the basepoint.
Choose any finite generating set of the finitely generated group . Starting from a finite generating set of , set
Every -word in of length at most is also an -word in of length at most . The inclusion of the corresponding word-metric balls is injective, so the growth function of a finitely generated group satisfies
A finitely generated group has polynomial growth of a group if its growth function is bounded above by for some constants .
Let be generated by . Since is a two-step nilpotent group, every group commutator is central. Commuting letters past one another therefore collects every word of length at most into the form
The generator exponents satisfy . At most exchanges are needed during collection, so is a sufficient bound. With , the number of possible collected expressions is at most
Relations can only reduce this count. This proves the polynomial growth of a finitely generated two-step nilpotent group, so every finitely generated two-step nilpotent group has polynomial growth.
Consider the matrices
Their projective action on the positive real line is
These disjoint images give the monoid version of the ping-pong lemma: after removing a common initial letter, two different positive words act differently. Thus generate a free monoid. There are distinct positive words of length , all lying in the radius- word ball for any generating set enlarged to contain . Therefore the Exponential growth of SL2 of Z gives
An amenable group is a group admitting a left-invariant finitely additive probability measure . For a -set , subsets are equidecomposable subsets under a group action if there are finite partitions , and elements such that . The action is a paradoxical group action if contains two disjoint subsets, each -equidecomposable with .
To prove the nonamenability of a nonabelian free group, write and let be the set of nonempty reduced words beginning with . Cancellation of the first letter gives the disjoint decompositions
If an invariant measure existed, these would imply
Every singleton has measure zero: invariance gives all singletons the same measure, and finite additivity over arbitrarily many distinct points forces that measure to vanish. The four sets partition , so their measures sum to one. The two displayed equations say that the same sum is two, a contradiction. Hence
For a finite generating set , the Følner condition requires that for every there be a nonempty finite such that
where denotes symmetric difference. Choose a Følner sequence and define normalized counting functions on all subsets by
By compactness of the product , some subnet converges pointwise to a function . The identities and finite additivity on disjoint subsets pass to the limit, so is a finitely additive probability measure.
For a fixed , the triangle inequality for symmetric differences gives
Consequently
so . The limit is left invariant and the Følner condition implies amenability. Thus every finitely generated group satisfying the Følner condition is amenable.
For the standard generator of the additive group , take the intervals
Only the two endpoints change under translation by , and hence
The same follows for every fixed integer translation by iteration. Therefore these sets are a Følner sequence for the integers, and satisfies the Følner condition.
Yes, but there is only one nontrivial isomorphism type that works. If , then
The infinite dihedral group contains its infinite cyclic rotation subgroup with index two, so it is amenable by virtually abelian groups are amenable.
Suppose now that . The action of on its Bass-Serre tree is non-elementary: one vertex degree is greater than two, so there are hyperbolic elements with disjoint pairs of endpoints. Suitable powers satisfy the ping-pong lemma on the boundary and generate a copy of . Since a subgroup of an amenable group is amenable, an amenable group cannot contain this nonamenable subgroup. The amenability of a free product therefore yields
for nontrivial finitely generated .

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.