Past exam of the nonlinear Optics and Quantum States of Light course of the University of Cambridge / 2015 / Paper 1 / 2

A finite beam has an intensity gradient across its wavefront. In an instantaneous optical Kerr model, $n(r)=n_0+n_{2}I(r)$. A bright centre therefore sees a larger index for $n_2>0$, accumulating more phase than the wings and producing self-focusing. Negative $n_2$ gives self-defocusing. For a short medium and Gaussian $I(r)=I_0{e}^{-2r^2/w^2}$, expand the nonlinear phase near the axis:Compare with the in-medium thin-lens phase $-k{r}^2/(2f)$, where $k=n_0{k}_0$. The Kerr lens has $1/f=4n_2{I}_{0}L/(n_0{w}^2)$. This local quadratic fit describes the central lens, not the whole Gaussian phase or a guaranteed aberration-free focus.

Propagation combines diffraction with the nonlinear phase. Choose $|A{|}^2=I$ and a scalar paraxial envelope, givingThe diffraction length is of order $k{w}^2$, while the nonlinear length is $1/(|\gamma |I_0)$. Their competition depends on total beam power as well as spot size. In two transverse dimensions, balancing them gives a critical power scale $P_{\mathrm{cr}}\sim {\lambda }_0^2/(n_0{n}_2)$ for positive $n_2$; the numerical constant requires a specified transverse profile and critical solution. In the ideal unsaturated cubic model, sufficiently strong focusing can collapse rather than form a stable beam. Real saturation, absorption, ionization or nonparaxial propagation can stop that ideal singularity; the appropriate mechanism depends on the material and pulse regime.

A broad focusing beam can also break into filaments. Perturb the uniform solution $A_0{e}^{i\gamma I_{0}z}$ by real amplitude and phase components with transverse wave number $q$. Linearization gives the transverse modulational instability rateFor positive $\gamma$, modes with $0<q^2<4k\gamma I_0$ grow. diffraction suppresses very fine perturbations. A finite beam's boundaries and available propagation length limit which filaments develop. The defocusing sign has no growing band in this simple instantaneous local model.

A spatial optical soliton instead has a profile whose nonlinear focusing balances diffraction. A one-transverse-dimensional cubic focusing model supports a stationary bright solution; the existence of that solution does not establish robust two-dimensional cubic self-trapping. A beam can also act on another finite beam through cross-phase modulation, producing an induced lens or steering it towards a high-index region. Unequal polarization response can rotate or reshape the profile. Temporal self-phase modulation is a related consequence of a time-dependent intensity, but should be distinguished from these transverse effects.

For an experimental check, vary power at fixed input waist and compare near- and far-field profiles with a low-power diffraction reference. Repeat with a second beam blocked to separate cross-phase modulation from self-action. Vary pulse duration or repetition rate to test thermal lensing against a prompt electronic response, and monitor transmission to distinguish nonlinear refraction from preferential absorption. A smaller output spot alone does not establish a soliton or a pure Kerr response.

For a local electric-dipole response of order $n$, writeIts susceptibility is a rank-$(n+1)$ tensor. Initially it has $3^{n+1}$ components in three dimensions, before symmetries and frequency constraints are applied. nonlinear-susceptibility tensor symmetry involves several logically different restrictions.

Neumann's principle requires invariance under the material point group. For an operation $R$,For inversion, $R=-I$, so ${\chi }^{(n)}=(-1{)}^{n+1}{\chi }^{(n)}$. Thus all even orders vanish in a centrosymmetric material's local bulk electric-dipole response. In particular ${\chi }^{(2)}=0$ there, while ${\chi }^{(3)}$ is permitted. Surface symmetry breaking, an applied bias or nonlocal magnetic/quadrupole response lies outside that statement. A noncentrosymmetric crystal permits some second-order components, but other point-group operations can still eliminate a chosen component.

Intrinsic permutation symmetry follows from interchanging commuting input field factors, provided the associated frequency labels are interchanged too. At second order,For equal input frequencies this makes the last two spatial indices symmetric, reducing 27 components to 18 before material symmetries. At unequal frequencies it does not identify the two index arrangements with the arguments held fixed. Reality of the time-domain polarization separately givescausality imposes dispersion relations; neither arbitrary real coefficients nor full index symmetry should be inferred merely from the word lossless.

Kleinman symmetry is a stronger approximation far from relevant resonances when frequency dispersion can be neglected. A frequency-independent effective interaction energy makes its derivatives interchangeable, allowing full permutation of output and input spatial indices. At second order a fully symmetric rank-three tensor has $\left(\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{5}{3}\right)=10$ components. Close to resonance or across a dispersive band, that reduction can fail even when absorption at the measured frequencies is small. The original analysis distinguishes high-resonance electronic response from strongly dispersive lattice mechanisms and identifies additional symmetry constraints on the former.^[ref]

For an isotropic fourth-rank susceptibility,If the relevant input slots are fully interchangeable, the coefficients coincide and ${\chi }_{xxxx}^{(3)}=3{\chi }_{xxyy}^{(3)}$. With distinct or mixed-sign frequency slots, frequency arguments must be followed and isotropy alone leaves the three displayed structures. These distinctions explain why tensor contractions, pump polarizations and operating frequencies must be specified before comparing effective self- and cross-phase coefficients.

spontaneous parametric down-conversion uses a second-order nonlinear polarization to convert pump energy into correlated signal and idler photons. With a classical undepleted pump, a single-mode interaction-picture model isThe creation term acts on the signal/idler vacuum, so no classical signal seed is required. The pump supplies the emitted energy; vacuum fluctuations are not an extra energy source. In the small-gain limit the SPDC pair state iswith normalization corrections understood at second order. More generally it is a two-mode squeezed vacuum with correlated pair numbers. A classical calculation with both generated fields exactly zero would miss the spontaneous start.

Efficient generation requires ${\omega }_p={\omega }_s+{\omega }_i$ and approximate wave-vector matching ${\mathbf{k}}_p={\mathbf{k}}_s+{\mathbf{k}}_i$. birefringence or a reciprocal grating vector in quasi-phase matching can compensate dispersion. In a continuum-mode treatment the pair amplitude includesThe pump spectrum constrains the sum frequency, while phase matching constrains the allowed frequency combinations and emission directions. type-I phase matching produces daughters in the same polarization class; type-II phase matching produces orthogonal ordinary/extraordinary classes. Correlation of pair numbers or orthogonal polarizations does not alone guarantee a polarization-entangled state in two chosen output paths.

One application is a heralded single-photon source: detect one partner and condition measurements on the other. Low gain suppresses multiple-pair contamination, whose probability begins at fourth order in the gain. Efficient collection and low detector noise matter. Spectral entanglement with an unresolved herald can leave the partner mixed; engineering or filtering the joint spectrum improves purity at a possible cost in brightness. Heralding does not make a photon appear in every pump pulse.

A second application is entangled-pair generation for quantum communication and tests of Bell inequalities. If the assignments $H_s{V}_i$ and $V_s{H}_i$ are indistinguishable except for polarization, their amplitudes can form $(|H_s{V}_i⟩+e^{i\phi }|V_s{H}_i⟩)/\sqrt{2}$. Walk-off, group delay or frequency labels can reveal which assignment occurred and destroy polarization interference. Their compensation is part of preparing the state, not merely an improvement in count rate.

A primary example pumped a 3-mm beta-barium-borate crystal with a $351.1\mathrm{nm}$ argon-ion laser. Collecting the two intersections of its type-II emission cones selected paired output directions. Half-wave rotation and compensating birefringent crystals reduced temporal walk-off, and polarization analysers with avalanche photodiodes measured coincidence fringes. Varying analyser settings tested the correlations; accidentals, mode distinguishability and detector/collection assumptions limited interpretation. The reported visibility exceeded 97 percent and supported a Bell violation under the stated auxiliary assumptions, rather than a loophole-free claim.^[ref]

Other uses include preparing interfering photons for quantum-information experiments, correlation-based imaging, and pair-based detector calibration. All rely on specified spatial and spectral modes and coincidence statistics. A pump-blocked background run, delayed-coincidence estimate, gain dependence and polarization/temporal-overlap scans distinguish correlated pairs from fluorescence, detector dark counts and accidental coincidences. The useful resource is the controlled joint quantum state, not simply two bright output beams.