For the distinct complex embeddings of the number field, define the discriminant of elements of a number field by
The equality follows by multiplying the transpose of the embedding matrix by itself. Each field trace is rational: it is also the trace of the rational matrix of multiplication by on . Thus the determinant lies in . If the are algebraic integers, the products and their conjugates are algebraic integers, and so are their sums. A rational algebraic integer is an integer, hence all trace entries and their determinant are integers.
Write . The inclusion of the generated abelian groups makes an integer matrix. Its embedding matrix is the embedding matrix of the multiplied by . Taking squared determinants gives
For independent algebraic integers , choose an integral basis of . The same formula gives . If is nonzero and a square-free integer, the integer index must be one, proving that the form an integral basis.
Now put . Since has degree three, the monic polynomial
is its minimal polynomial of an algebraic element. The field norm is the negative of its constant term:
For the discriminant calculation, . In the basis , using , multiplication by this element has matrix
Thus the given derivative-norm formula gives . Since satisfies a monic polynomial with integer coefficients, are algebraic integers; the fact that a squarefree discriminant certifies an integral basis proves
Dedekind factorization theorem states that if with integral and does not divide , then a factorization of its minimal polynomial of an algebraic element into distinct monic irreducible polynomials over gives
The factors are distinct prime ideals; the residue degrees and ramification indices satisfy . Unique prime ideal factorization holds in the ring of integers.
For a square-free integer , , so the index condition is automatic. If , the polynomial reduces to modulo . Hence
Therefore . By unique prime ideal factorization, .
Let be a nonempty proper subset and put . For , and is a square-free integer. If , its ideal norm gives
The inequality forces , leaving , impossible for a square-free integer greater than one. Thus every such subproduct is nonprincipal.
These are ramified prime classes for discriminant minus four d. The ideal classes have order dividing two. Their product is the identity, and the preceding proof rules out every other nonempty subset relation. The homomorphism defined by these classes consequently has kernel exactly . Its image is therefore
The boundary case has and makes the printed exponent meaningless; its field is with trivial ideal class group. The subgroup statement is understood for , while the prime-factor and proper-subset statements are empty for .
Minkowski convex body theorem states that a centrally symmetric convex measurable subset of with volume greater than times the covolume of a full Euclidean lattice contains a nonzero lattice point. The equivalent closed-boundary form follows by compactness for compact convex bodies.
The set is centrally symmetric. It is convex because for , the triangle inequality gives . It is a diamond of area . For the embedded nonzero integral ideal , the given covolume is . Hence Minkowski convex body theorem applies when
For the resulting nonzero , write , . Then
Decrease to . A fixed slightly larger diamond contains only finitely many lattice points, so one nonzero recurs along a sequence of such values. Passing to the limit proves
Given a target ideal class , choose an integral ideal in . Since , the ideal is integral, belongs to , and has ideal norm
For , every ideal class thus has an integral representative of norm at most . The only possibilities are norms one, two or three. The prime two ramifies, giving the unique ideal of norm two . The element has field norm , so , making it principal. The prime three is inert because is an irreducible polynomial; its prime ideal has norm nine, so there is no ideal of norm three. Every possible small representative is principal, proving class number one for Q square root of fourteen. Therefore
Work in , since . First must be odd: if it were even, coprimality would make odd, so , which cannot be an odd power for . Thus is odd too. Also no odd prime can divide both and . Such a prime does not divide , and square-freeness of gives , whereas is divisible by . Hence .
Put . Suppose a prime ideal divides both and , and let be the rational prime below it. It then contains and . The case is impossible because is odd. If is odd, the first inclusion gives , and makes nonzero in the residue field. The second inclusion therefore gives , so , contradicting the previous paragraph. Thus and are coprime ideals. In particular they generate the unit ideal, the precise meaning of coprimality here; no unique factorization of elements is assumed.
Their product is . Unique prime ideal factorization and disjoint prime support imply for an integral ideal . In the ideal class group, . Since does not divide the class number, Lagrange's theorem forces . Write . Equality of the principal ideals gives . The only units are , since a unit satisfies and . Both signs are th powers for odd , so they can be absorbed into the generator:
Apply the class-number obstruction from a ramified odd exponent. For the equation with and , compare the coefficients of in this identity. The coefficient on the right is
Its term is divisible by , and every term contains a factor , so the whole coefficient is divisible by . The coefficient on the left is one, a contradiction. Thus there are no positive integer solutions under the stated class-number and divisibility assumptions.
Finally,
The integer is square-free, is two modulo four, and is divisible by three. If its imaginary quadratic class number were not divisible by three, the preceding result with would prohibit this solution. Consequently

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.