Let denote the conventional Legendre polynomial, normalized by . The quadrature nodes are its distinct polynomial roots in . For these nodes form the Lagrange cardinal polynomials
Choose the quadrature weights by integrating these polynomials:
An equivalent standard formula is
The reason for selecting these quadrature nodes is the resulting degree of precision of a quadrature rule. For any polynomial of polynomial degree at most , polynomial division gives
The orthogonality of the Legendre polynomial makes , while at each quadrature node. The definition of the quadrature weights integrates exactly, so
In particular, . Applying this exactness to also proves .
Truncate the Chebyshev series at the full degree of precision of a quadrature rule:
Since on , the geometric series estimate gives
The same bound proves uniform convergence of the original Chebyshev series, so its sum and the tail estimate are justified. Gauss-Legendre quadrature is exact on . Its positive quadrature weights sum to , hence
Therefore one explicit choice proving exponential convergence of Gaussian quadrature is
Using exactness through polynomial degree doubles the exponent compared with truncating at polynomial degree .
Set . For column indices , the product has polynomial degree at most , so exactness of Gauss-Legendre quadrature and orthonormality give
Thus is a square matrix with , and therefore is an orthogonal matrix: as well. It follows that
Equivalently, the rows of the generalized Vandermonde matrix are orthogonal and
The normalization matters: here , where is the conventional Legendre polynomial used above. Thus a formula containing only the nodes and the question's orthonormal polynomials is
This identity is the discrete orthogonality of Gaussian quadrature.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.