Multiply the equation for by and the equation for by , then subtract. The terms cancel and the derivative terms combine into a Wronskian boundary derivative:
Integrating over the interval eliminates the boundary term because both eigenfunctions vanish at both endpoints. Since their eigenvalues differ,
This is orthogonality in a weighted inner product in the regular Sturm-Liouville setting; the endpoint values must justify the integration by parts.
If , only a linear function can solve the equation, and zero endpoint values make it zero. If , the corresponding hyperbolic-sine solution also cannot vanish at both endpoints unless it is zero. For , the first endpoint gives , and the second requires for a positive integer . Thus .
The admissible trial function has quotient
Therefore the minimum, or infimum before its attainment is established, is as requested. The sharp Poincaré inequality supplies the reverse inequality on the finite-energy zero-trace class, so the exact minimum is also and is attained by this trial function. The one-sided assertion in the source does not require a full variational existence argument.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.