Let be the log-likelihood. Under the usual regularity conditions, the expected Fisher information in the whole sample is
The equality of the two expressions uses mean-zero score and permitted differentiation of the normalization identity. Independent observations make the information additive. The maximum-likelihood estimator has asymptotic normality:
The factor is included in ; it must not be inserted a second time into the variance.
Let for the standard normal cumulative distribution function. Consistency of the maximum-likelihood estimator and Slutsky's theorem give the asymptotic standardization
Its probability of lying between and tends to . Solving those inequalities for the unknown parameter yields the Wald confidence interval
Thus the estimated standard error is . Its coverage is approximate and relies on the large-sample regularity assumptions.
For the stated geometric distribution, write . Then
Since , we have . Taking expectation gives the sample Fisher information
The support begins at one, so this expectation uses the trials-until-first-success convention of the geometric law.
For the Bernoulli distribution, with ,
Using , the expected Fisher information is
For the same sample size , the geometric distribution provides more Fisher information:
The corresponding asymptotic variances of the maximum-likelihood estimators are
Hence choose the geometric sample for more precise inference at equal numbers of observations. Its asymptotic variance is times as large, and its standard error is times as large. This illustrates Fisher information per observation and per trial. It is a per-observation comparison: one geometric observation records a waiting time containing, on average, Bernoulli trials. A constraint on the total number of underlying trials would be a different sampling-budget comparison.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.