Past exam of the quantum condensed matter course of the University of Cambridge / 2014 / 1

Use a representative conduction-electron density $n\sim 10^{29}{\mathrm{m}}^{-3}$, roughly one mobile Electron per atom in a dense metal, and the bare Electron mass for this estimate. The plasma frequency is thenThis is an order-of-magnitude answer because no particular metal or carrier density is specified. It corresponds to an ordinary frequency $f_p\simeq 2.8\times 10^{15}\mathrm{Hz}$, excitation energy $\hslash {\omega }_p\simeq 12\mathrm{eV}$, and free-space wavelength near $1.1\times 10^{-7}\mathrm{m}$.

The physical oscillation is collective motion of the electron gas against the positive ionic background. Displacing the Electrons relative to the ions produces a restoring electric field. In the simplest uniform-displacement picture, $\ddot{x}+{\omega }_p^{2}x=0$: the frequency increases with the density of mobile electric charge and decreases with carrier inertia. Quantizing this longitudinal collective oscillation gives a plasmon.

The same scale controls the ideal collisionless Drude model optical response. Its cold collisionless plasma dielectric response is ${ϵ}_r(\omega )=1-{\omega }_p^2/{\omega }^2$. Below ${\omega }_p$, the negative relative permittivity makes a transverse electromagnetic wave evanescent, producing strong reflection; above it, the ideal model admits propagation. Real-metal collisions, interband photon absorption and background polarization modify this simple optical edge. Thus ${\omega }_p$ is a collective charge-response scale, not a single-electron scattering rate or a sharp transparency threshold for every real metal.

Adopt the usual orthogonal tight-binding approximation, so the three localized spatial states are orthonormal. Each site has two neighbors, with the same real hopping matrix element. For coefficients $c_n$, the Schrödinger equation at site $n$ isThe constant-coefficient state has $c_1=c_2=c_3$, giving energy $E_0+2t$. Its normalization therefore yieldsTo verify that it is the ground state, the three discrete ring momenta are $\theta =0,\pm 2\pi /3$, with $c_n\propto e^{i\theta (n-1)}$ and energies $E_0+2t\cos \theta$. The other two states both have energy $E_0-t$. Since $t<0$, $E_0+2t<E_0-t$ and the gap is $3|t|$. This is the three-site tight-binding ring spectrum.

The spatial ground state is unique and has equal probability $1/3$ on every site; its common overall phase is arbitrary. Spin would supply a separate twofold degeneracy when no spin-dependent terms are included, but does not change the requested spatial state. If the localized functions were instead nonorthogonal raw atomic orbitals, their overlap matrix would be additional data needed for normalization and a generalized eigenvalue problem.

The energy favoring spin polarization must compete with the increase in Fermi kinetic energy. Assume the usual three-dimensional zero-temperature parabolic conduction band at fixed $N$ and $V$. Write the spin polarization as $\zeta =(N_{\uparrow }-N_{\downarrow })/N$, so $N_{\uparrow ,\downarrow }=N(1\pm \zeta )/2$. The unpolarized Fermi energy isThe two spin populations have Fermi energies $E_F(1\pm \zeta {)}^{2/3}$. Summing their individual $3E_{F,\sigma }/5$ mean kinetic energies givesThe specified interaction is an energy per Electron, $U(1-{\zeta }^2)/4$. Thus the energy change per Electron near the unpolarized state isThe quadratic coefficient changes sign at the Stoner threshold for an interaction normalized per electron,The positive quartic term gives a continuous onset in this model. More globally, $f^{\prime \prime }(\zeta )=(E_F/3)[(1+\zeta {)}^{-1/3}+(1-\zeta {)}^{-1/3}]-U/2$. Convexity of $x^{-1/3}$ makes this nonnegative for $U\le 4E_F/3$, so no lower polarized minimum appears before that threshold.

At fixed number density $N/V$, the critical $U$ is independent of the total sample size. A comparison restricted to a fully polarized state gives a different numerical coefficient, $U>\frac{12}{5}{E}_F(2^{2/3}-1)$, but the same requested density scaling; it misses the partially polarized onset. One must also distinguish this $U$, with units of energy, from a contact coupling multiplying an interaction-energy density $g{n}_{\uparrow }{n}_{\downarrow }$: here $g=U/(N/V)$. Importing a differently normalized Stoner criterion would introduce an erroneous extra density factor.