A subset is a basis of a module if every has a unique expression
Uniqueness concerns the entire family of coefficients, including the zero coefficients. Equivalently, generates and is linearly independent in a module: every finite relation , with , has all .
A module is a free module if it has a basis of a module. An infinite basis of a module still uses only finite sums in each expression; arbitrary infinite sums are not part of the module operations.
Yes. An -module over a field is a vector space. Start with a finite generating list. If it is linearly dependent, one vector has a nonzero coefficient in a linear relation; dividing by that coefficient expresses the vector using the others, so it can be removed without changing the span. Repeating terminates with a linearly independent generating list, which is a basis and therefore a basis of a module.
Thus every finitely generated module over a field is a free module. For the zero module, the empty list is the required basis of a module.
In the direct sum of modules , every has a unique expression , with and . Define
The uniqueness makes this well-defined. For , and ,
so is a module homomorphism. Finally, exactly when , equivalently . Therefore . Its image is , and , so it is the projection onto that direct summand.
Put and , the submodules generated by the two parts of the basis of a module. Every finite expression in the basis of a module splits into its terms and its terms. Thus .
If , there are finite expressions
Subtracting gives a finite relation among distinct members of , because . Their linear independence in a module forces every coefficient to vanish, so . Hence
This proves the basis partition gives a module direct sum lemma, also when one part is empty.
Choose a countable generating family for . For each , the expression of in the basis of a module has a finite set of nonzero coefficients, its coordinate support in a free module. Let
By the countable union of countable sets property, is a countable set. Every belongs to , so all finite -linear combinations of the do too. Therefore
Here and below, countable includes finite. The same construction applies to a finite or empty generating family. This is the countable basis support lemma.
For , let have and for . If and , then can be nonzero only where or is nonzero, and can be nonzero only where is nonzero. These are finite sets. Since , this proves that is a submodule.
Every has the finite expression
Evaluating at coordinate recovers the coefficient of , so the expression is unique. Thus is a basis of a module for , and
is a free module. By contrast, the ambient module of integer sequences allows arbitrary integer sequences.
Under the temporary assumption that is a basis of a module for , part (a)(v) applied to the countably generated submodule gives a countable set such that . By part (a)(iv),
Use part (a)(iii) to project onto the second direct summand. This gives a module homomorphism with
It remains to check the required size of this kernel. Enumerate as , with the finite case treated the same way. Every element of is a finite sum of these elements with integer coefficients. For each , the set is the image of the countable set , so it is countable. Taking their countable union proves
This is the countability of countably generated abelian groups argument; it uses the countability of the scalar ring .
Consider
The map sending a sequence of signs to is a bijection from onto . This is an uncountable set by the Cantor diagonal argument: given a proposed list of its elements, define . Then differs from at coordinate for every .
Since is countable, cannot be contained in it. Consequently there exists
For every , truncate before coordinate :
This lies in . For , . For , , which is divisible by . In particular the integer sequence
belongs to and satisfies .
Apply the module homomorphism . Since ,
Fixing any coordinate , the integer is therefore divisible by for every . The only such integer is zero: if , choose with , which rules out for any nonzero integer . Thus every coordinate of vanishes, contradicting part (b)(iii).
It follows that
The decisive property is vanishing of infinitely divisible integer sequences, namely .

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.