The defining relation lets us move every occurrence of to the right of every occurrence of . More generally, repeated conjugation gives
Negative powers cause no problem because and . Thus every word in the group presentation can be put in the required form, reducing powers using :
At this stage existence is proved; uniqueness will follow from the concrete semidirect product in part (b). Moving past gives the multiplication law
The action is consistent with reduction of modulo because .
For the given group homomorphism , the external semidirect product has underlying Cartesian product and operation
The notation denotes the automorphism group of . Closure follows because is an automorphism of . To check associativity, calculate both bracketings:
They agree because . The identity is , using , and the two-sided inverse is
Indeed multiplication in either order gives the identity, using . This verifies the group axioms.
For the specified group presentation, take and . The rule defines an automorphism because is coprime to . Furthermore , so defines the required group homomorphism . In the resulting semidirect product , the canonical generators satisfy
Consequently the group presentation defines a surjective group homomorphism , sending to and to . The underlying Cartesian product gives , whereas part (a) gives . Surjectivity forces equality, so the map is an isomorphism:
This also proves that the normal forms in part (a) are distinct and that has element order exactly .
The cyclic subgroup is normal: conjugation by sends to , and conjugation by fixes it. Modulo this subgroup, the relation becomes , so the quotient group is Abelian. Thus the commutator subgroup is contained in .
Conversely the displayed relation gives the commutator , so . Hence
Since has element order , , so the first commutator subgroup is nontrivial. Therefore
Here derived length counts the number of steps needed for the derived series to reach the trivial group.
The given unitriangular group of degree three over F3 has elements, just as does, so counting alone cannot distinguish them. Instead compare element orders.
Write an element as , with strictly upper triangular of size . Then . Over the finite field , the binomial theorem for commuting matrices gives
Every nonidentity element of consequently has element order . In contrast, has element order , by part (b). An isomorphism preserves element order, so
Equivalently, the exponent of a finite group is for and for .

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.