The real scalar field action has spacetime translations and Lorentz invariance, together giving Poincaré symmetry. With a real scalar transformation law it also has parity and time reversal. A generic polynomial potential has no continuous internal symmetry. The additional field reversal is a symmetry precisely when every nonzero odd-power coupling vanishes. The free massless special case also admits a constant shift of ; generic interactions remove it.
In mass units, and the dimensionless action requires . Normalizing the kinetic term fixes the classical mass dimension of the scalar field:For each interaction, , soThese are classical or engineering scaling dimensions; quantum corrections can change the scaling of operators and couplings. The scale transformation prescribed later has field weight one, which equals this canonical weight only at .
Put . The Euler-Lagrange equation for the scalar field is , or explicitlyThe derivative of is ; all interaction terms therefore enter with the displayed plus sign for the chosen Minkowski metric.
The finite passive dilatation is , . To compare at the same argument, invert the coordinate change:Consequently the fixed-argument infinitesimal variation isThis also follows from and . The plus sign on the derivative term is a consequence of this specified contraction of coordinates.
Under the finite dilatation, , and . Keeping the couplings fixed givesThus the full finite change isFor invariance for arbitrary fields and all constant , the fixed nonzero kinetic term requires . Then the mass term requires , and every nonzero coupling must have . Henceincluding the free choice . At the canonical mass dimension is and , so only the quartic interaction has a dimensionless coupling. A mass introduces a scale. This recovers the same result from solution.
The fixed field weight in the question matters: if it were replaced by the general canonical weight , the kinetic term could be invariant in other dimensions, and a nonzero monomial interaction would require for . That is a different transformation from the one specified here. The result above is classical; quantum running generally breaks the quartic theory's scale invariance.
In the classically scale-invariant case from solution, use , and . Dividing the supplied Noether current expression by givesSince , this isThe first term in this dilatation current comes from the intrinsic weight of the scalar field, while the second comes from moving its spacetime argument. Using the canonical energy-momentum tensor alone without the first term would not give the stated conserved current.
For a translation-invariant potential, the on-shell energy-momentum tensor obeys . The divergence of the dilatation current is thereforeUse the equation of motion to obtain the useful general identityFor , and only nonzero, every term vanishes. More explicitly, while ; adding the first kinetic term cancels both remaining contributions. Thus , and is conserved when the boundary flux vanishes. Outside the parameter conditions of solution, the boxed formula displays the classical sources of scale breaking; the same current need not be conserved.
For a free real scalar field in four spacetime dimensions, and . Canonical quantization promotes these canonical fields to Hermitian operator-valued distributions with equal-time canonical commutation relationsExpand the solution of the Klein-Gordon equation into positive- and negative-frequency modes:Hermiticity pairs the two coefficients as adjoints. The field commutators are equivalent toFor example, inserting the expansion in yields two equal Fourier integrals, each with coefficient , and hence . The vacuum obeys , and repeated creation operators generate the symmetric bosonic Fock space. Normal ordering of the quadratic Hamiltonian removes its vacuum constant and gives ; the same computation for the spatial momentum gives the stipulated four-momentum .
The oscillator algebra now impliesConsequentlyIndeed, . For , the result is , which is the Heisenberg equation of motion with the correct sign. As usual, the field identities are interpreted after smearing the operator-valued distributions, or on a suitable common finite-particle domain.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.