Past exam of the thermal and statistical physics course of the University of Cambridge / 2017 / 3 / a / Solution

Component chemical potentials. Define the per-spin quantum concentration $n_Q={\lambda }_T^{-3}=(m{k}_{B}T/(2\pi {\hslash }^2){)}^{3/2}$. For a classical component with one-particle potential energy $U_{\sigma }(\mathbf{r})$, the local Helmholtz free energy density is $k_{B}T{n}_{\sigma }[\ln (n_{\sigma }/n_Q)-1]+n_{\sigma }{U}_{\sigma }$. Its derivative with respect to number density gives the full local chemical potential, including the magnetic energy. With the up state defined as the lower level,The Bohr magneton ${\mu }_B$ is a magnetic moment; ${\mu }_{B}B$ is an energy. The factor two for the two spin states is not already included in $n_Q$.

Total equilibrium chemical potential. If spin conversion is allowed, a particle can be added in either spin state at the same equilibrium free-energy cost. Thusnot their sum or zero. The total particle number, or a reservoir, fixes this common value; the supplied information does not specify a numerical chemical potential. A useful local expression is $\mu =k_{B}T\ln [n/(2n_Q\cosh x)]$, with $x={\mu }_{B}B/(k_{B}T)$, whose density dependence is found below.

Why it is uniform and common. Moving a small number $dN$ of one species from ${\mathbf{r}}_1$ to ${\mathbf{r}}_2$ changes the free energy by $[{\mu }_{\sigma }({\mathbf{r}}_2)-{\mu }_{\sigma }({\mathbf{r}}_1)]dN$. If this difference were nonzero, a transfer could lower the free energy. Equilibrium under diffusion therefore requires each full chemical potential to be spatially constant. A spin flip transferring $dN$ from down to up similarly changes free energy by $({\mu }_{\uparrow }-{\mu }_{\downarrow })dN$, proving equality when spin relaxation is permitted. This is chemical equilibrium of a classical spin gas. Mere thermal contact at fixed separate spin populations would not enforce the latter equality; full spin equilibrium is the necessary assumption. A spatially varying magnetic field is balanced by a spatially varying density, not by a varying full chemical potential.

Magnetization. Invert the component equations at the common $\mu$:The two levels have moments $+{\mu }_B$ and $-{\mu }_B$ along the field. The magnetization, magnetic moment per unit volume, is thereforeIts SI units are $\mathrm{A}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$. This expression neglects interactions and magnetic feedback of the gas on the specified external field.

High-temperature response. For $|x|\ll 1$, $\sinh x\simeq x$ and $\cosh x\simeq 1$, yieldingAt fixed number density, this is the Curie law: the susceptibility with respect to $B$ is $n{\mu }_B^2/(k_{B}T)$. The conventional dimensionless susceptibility with respect to $H$ is approximately ${\chi }_v={\mu }_{0}n{\mu }_B^2/(k_{B}T)$ when $B\simeq {\mu }_{0}H$. At fixed $\mu$, however, $n_Q{e}^{\beta \mu }$ changes with temperature, so $M$ itself need not scale simply as $1/T$. The moment per particle has the Curie behaviour; the density constraint must be stated.

Total density. Adding the two populations givesFor a finite container and fixed $N$, normalization gives $e^{\beta \mu }=N/[2n_Q\int \cosh x(\mathbf{r})d^{3}r]$. In a weak field the leading density is uniform, with changes only of order $x^2$. Particles preferentially occupy regions where the magnitude of the field lowers one of the spin energies, even though the common chemical potential remains uniform.