Topology and Groups, Tuesday 1 June 2010, 2.30pm–4.00pm. The cover cross-lists Mathematics and Mathematics and Philosophy Parts B and C under the printed label C3.1a. This complete four-page scanned paper was supplied through the past-papers disclosure, in original Part C bundle pages 317–320. Every source page and the labelled covering graph were read directly; the private editable transcription includes all text and an editable reconstruction of that graph. No exact worked-answer advertisement was found in the bounded availability check.
A homotopy from to is a continuous map with and for every . A covering map is a surjective continuous map for which every has an open neighborhood whose inverse image is a disjoint union of open sets, each mapped homeomorphically onto . A lift of is a continuous map satisfying .
The path lifting theorem says that a path and a point determine a unique path with and .
On there is a continuous branch of the complex argument, taking values in . If avoids , set . Then the explicit homotopy
starts at and ends at the constant map . It is continuous because the chosen argument branch is continuous on the whole image. More generally, a map omitting any is null-homotopic: apply the formula to and multiply the resulting homotopy by .
For the based injective map, use the standard covering map . Lift the path on to a real-valued path with . Since , its endpoint is an integer. On , is injective: equality implies , then by injectivity, and hence in this half-open interval. A continuous injective real-valued function on an interval is strictly monotone.
If is increasing, . It cannot be at least , because the intermediate value theorem would produce with , giving while . Thus . If is decreasing, the same reasoning gives . Now define
At and this has the same value for every , since is an integer. Therefore the formula descends continuously from to . At it is ; at it is . Hence is homotopic to the identity or to complex conjugation, with degree or . This is the key property of an injective self-map of a circle.
Finally, let be any continuous injective circle self-map. Normalize it to , which is injective and fixes . If were not surjective, it would omit some circle point, so the explicit missing-point construction would make null-homotopic. Multiplying this homotopy by would make null-homotopic too. But is homotopic to the identity or conjugation, neither of which is null-homotopic by the permitted fact. This contradiction proves every continuous injective circle self-map is surjective. The lifting argument did not assume surjectivity, so the reasoning is not circular.
The normal closure is the smallest normal subgroup of containing , equivalently the intersection of all normal subgroups containing . Any such normal subgroup contains every and hence every finite product of these elements. Thus .
Include the empty product so that , in particular when . Products of elements of are obtained by concatenating their factor lists. Inversion reverses the list and replaces by , so is closed under inverses. For any ,
Therefore is a normal subgroup and it contains . Minimality of the normal closure gives the reverse inclusion, proving
The notation in a finite-product description is understood to allow the empty product; otherwise the empty generating subset would require a separate identity convention.
In a group presentation, is a set of formal generators and is a subset of the free group , consisting of relators which are required to become the identity. The presented group is
The universal property of a group presentation says that a function extends to a group homomorphism from the presented group precisely when every relator evaluates to in : first extend freely to , then factor through the quotient because its kernel contains the normal closure of .
A rotation by and a reflection of a regular -gon satisfy
The last identity holds because reflection reverses the sense of rotation, and it implies . Hence all defining relators vanish, giving a homomorphism with and .
To prove it is an isomorphism without presupposing the order of the presented group, use . Move every occurrence of to the left, cancel pairs by , and reduce exponents modulo . Every element has one of the forms
Thus . For the usual regular polygon with , the rotations are distinct and the reflections are distinct; no rotation is a reflection, since their planar orientation behavior differs. The supplied description says these exhaust , so , and every one lies in the image of . Surjectivity and the order bound force and trivial kernel. Thus is an isomorphism.
For the requested Cayley graph, use right multiplication by the generators. The edges are the two directed 3-cycles
The edges are the undirected pairs
These pairs use . Thus the underlying graph is a triangular prism, with the two rotation cycles oriented oppositely when reflection pairs are drawn as radial edges.
Figure 1.
The Cayley graph of the dihedral group of order six
. Blue arrows are right multiplication by sigma. Orange undirected edges are right multiplication by the involution tau. Details.
A deck transformation of a covering is a homeomorphism with . A connected covering is a regular covering map if its deck transformation group acts transitively on each fiber; for a path-connected base, transitivity on the fiber over the chosen basepoint is equivalent.
Write and . A based loop represents an element of exactly when its lift starting at is closed. Indeed a closed lift itself projects to a representative of an image element; conversely the image of a closed path lifts to that path, and the closed-endpoint property is unchanged by based homotopy.
Suppose the covering is regular, let , and let . Lift a representative of from to an endpoint . By regularity some deck transformation sends to . Applying it to the closed lift of gives a closed lift of at , by uniqueness in the path lifting theorem. The concatenation of the lift of , that closed lift of , and the reverse lift of is therefore a closed lift of . Thus ; applying the same argument to gives equality. Hence a regular covering has a normal image subgroup.
For the explicit cover, label the bottom vertex , the top , the left , the right , and the rear/front equatorial vertices , respectively. Reading the arrows gives the complete monodromy table:
StartAfter After
Thus the edges form the cycle , and the edges form the cycle . In particular every vertex has one incoming and one outgoing edge of each label, as a covering of the two-circle wedge requires. All word paths below are traversed from left to right.
Figure 1.
The two directed cycles describing the octahedral covering
. Both panels use the same six named vertices. Their union is the covering graph; following x or y gives the monodromy table. Details.
Choose the spanning tree consisting of the first five edges from to . The tree paths to have labels . For every directed non-tree edge , the path from along the tree to , then along the edge, then back along the tree from , has label . Collapsing a spanning tree turns a connected graph into a wedge of circles, so these paths form a free basis of its fundamental group. There are seven non-tree edges, since . Their projected labels give the explicit generating set
The covering map induces an injection on fundamental groups, so these seven generators are also a free basis for the image subgroup. The first comes from the remaining edge ; the other six come from the outgoing edge at each vertex in the table.
Now the word lifts at around the triangle
so . Starting at , however, its lift is
which is not closed. A deck transformation sending to would take the first closed path to a closed lift of the same word at , contradicting uniqueness of lifts and the displayed nonclosed path. No such deck transformation exists. This is also the closed-lift obstruction expressed by the deck transformation group as a monodromy centralizer.
For a connected covering of a connected, locally path-connected, semilocally simply connected space, the classification of connected covering spaces says that the image subgroup is normal if and only if the covering is regular. The two-circle wedge and this connected finite graph satisfy those hypotheses. Since regularity fails, is not normal in the base group . All normality comparisons here are in that base group.
Finally take
The lift of from follows
It ends at , so . This is the required explicit witness, and independently proves the failure of normality.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.