A topological space is compact if every open cover has a finite subcover:There is no Hausdorff requirement in this definition.
Let be an open cover of . By continuity, the inverse images are open in ; by surjectivity, they cover . Compactness supplies finitely many covering . Applying and using shows that the corresponding finitely many cover .
Thus a continuous surjective function from a compact space has compact target. This is the continuous image of a compact space theorem.
For the canonical projection of a quotient set , defineThe inverse images of the empty set and whole target are and . Inverse images commute with arbitrary unions and finite intersections, so the topology axioms follow from those of . This is the quotient topology, and it makes continuous by definition.
The crucial criterion is an equivalence: is open precisely when is open. This is stronger than continuity alone and is what makes the next part work.
If is continuous, then so is , as a composition of continuous functions. Conversely, suppose is continuous. For an open subset ,is open in . The quotient topology criterion therefore says is open in . This proves continuity of .This is the universal property of the quotient topology.
Since misses , the open set contains the whole collapsed equivalence class . Every other equivalence class is a singleton, so is saturated under the saturation of a subset operation:Its preimage is open, so the quotient topology givesThe hypothesis is exactly what prevents the saturation of a subset from adding missing points of the collapsed class.
Use , . This is continuous, identifies the two endpoints, and is otherwise injective. Its fibres are exactly the equivalence classes for collapsing a subset to a point with . Hence it factors uniquely through a bijectionBy the universal property of the quotient topology, is continuous. The interval is compact, so its quotient is compact. The unit circle is Hausdorff. The compact-to-Hausdorff continuous bijection theorem now shows that is a homeomorphism:Indeed the theorem makes the inverse continuous because images of closed subsets of a compact space are compact and hence closed in a Hausdorff target.
Every quotient class has a representative in : the collapsed class has representatives , and the others are the points of . Thus is a continuous surjection from a compact interval onto . It follows that is compact, despite the noncompact original space.
Define the continuous mapThe formulas agree at both junctions, and its fibres are exactly the required equivalence classes. It induces a continuous bijection , which is a homeomorphism by compactness and the Hausdorff condition on the circle.The quotient notation means that the displayed entire subset becomes one point.
Collapsing the integers gives a Hausdorff space. For two distinct noninteger points, choose disjoint small open intervals around them that avoid . Each interval is saturated under the saturation of a subset operation, so its image is an open neighbourhood of its class. For a noninteger and the collapsed class, choose . The disjoint open setsare saturated; contains and contains all integers. Their images separate the two quotient points. These exhaust all pairs of distinct classes.
Collapsing the rationals does not give a Hausdorff space. The preimage of the singleton collapsed point is , which is not closed in . Therefore that quotient singleton is not closed, whereas every singleton of a Hausdorff space is closed.Equivalently, every nonempty saturated open subset of meets the dense set and therefore contains it all. Every nonempty quotient open set contains the collapsed point, making separation from any other quotient point impossible.
No countable subset works. For any countable set , choose : each nonempty interval is uncountable. The sequence tends to infinity, so every tailis closed in and disjoint from . By part (i), is open in . These sets increase and cover , since no point belongs to every tail. But any finite selection is contained in its largest member, which still misses every quotient point in that member's remaining tail. The represent distinct singleton classes.
This is an open cover without a finite subcover, provingThe argument does not assume that is closed, bounded, or discrete. It is the noncompactness after collapsing a countable real subset obstruction.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.