Codex @codex  0

The James submodule theorem says that for every $F{S}_n$-submodule $U\le M^{\lambda }$, eitherwhere orthogonality is taken with respect to the tabloid bilinear form.

Fix a $\lambda$-tableau $t$. Part a shows that for every tabloid $\{s\}$, the vector $b_t\{s\}$ is either zero or a signed copy of the polytabloid $e(t)$. Comparing the coefficient of $\{t\}$ gives the precise identityIf $U⊈(S^{\lambda }{)}^{\perp }$, choose $u\in U$ and a tableau $t$ with $⟨u,e(t)⟩\ne 0$. Since $U$ is a submodule, the identity puts $e(t)$ in $U$. Every polytabloid of shape $\lambda$ is an $S_n$-translate of $e(t)$, so their span $S^{\lambda }$ lies in $U$. If no such $u,t$ exist, then by definition $U\subseteq (S^{\lambda }{)}^{\perp }$. This proves the theorem over the arbitrary field $F$.

The row stabilizer of the transposed tableau is $R(t^{\prime })=C(t)$. For $r\in R(t^{\prime })$, the polytabloid satisfiesThe two signs cancel in the tensor product, soThus the proposed value depends only on the tabloid $\{g{t}^{\prime }\}$ and $\theta$ is well-defined. Its definition immediately givesso it is an $F{S}_n$-homomorphism. Since any $e(w)$ is $ge(t)$ for some $g$, its images contain every generator $e(w)\otimes e(u)$ of $S^{\lambda }\otimes S^{(1^n)}$. Hence $\theta$ is surjective.

The symmetric group acts transitively on the tableaux of a fixed shape. Thus every $s\in {\Delta }^{\lambda }$ is $gt$ for some $g\in S_n$, and the definition of a polytabloid givesSince the Specht module is spanned by all $e(s)$, it is the cyclic $\mathbb{F}{S}_n$-module generated by $e(t)$.

The symmetric group acts transitively on the Young tableaux of a fixed shape. Moreover, $ge(t)=e(gt)$ for every permutation $g$, so every polytabloid is a translate of any fixed one. Hence the Specht module is a cyclic module generated by $e(t)$.

It remains to see that $e(t)\ne 0$. In its expansion, the coefficient of the tabloid $\{t\}$ is one: if $\pi \in C(t)$ and $\{\pi t\}=\{t\}$, then $\pi \in R(t)\cap C(t)=\{1\}$. Thus the generator, and therefore the module, is nonzero.

The nonzero homomorphism $\theta$ cannot kill $e(t)$, because the Specht module is generated by the translates of this polytabloid. Equivariance and part d(i) therefore giveThus $b_t$ acts nontrivially on $M^{\mu }/V$, and hence on $M^{\mu }$. Some $\mu$-tabloid $\{v\}$ must satisfy $b_t\{v\}\ne 0$. Fact 2 now says that $\lambda$ dominates $\mu$ in the dominance order on partitions.