The quiet interval required for an RC baseline timing budget controls how much a residual capacitor baseline may advance the next threshold crossing. In residual baseline in RC pulse-width discrimination, a positive baseline changes the relaxed crossing byFor a permitted advance , requiring is equivalent to , where . To retain a fresh rising crossing, also require , equivalently .
After a previous peak , a zero-input low interval gives . Hence a measured upper bound on that peak gives the sufficient intervalUsing only the model bound recovers the conservative expression in the header, . The peak bound and initial-state assumptions are part of the guarantee. The next pulse must still last long enough to produce the rising crossing; this timing bound alone does not guarantee acceptance.
For an original timing budget, let , and . Then , and the conservative interval is . If a validated peak bound is only , it reduces to . Simply calling either interval several time constants long would hide the actual timing specification.
For , expansion gives under the full-height peak bound. Tightening a small timing allowance by a factor of two therefore adds roughly of quiet time. If the allowed advance is as large as the whole relaxed crossing time, a separate reset condition is still required; the logarithmic timing budget alone no longer ensures the initial output is below threshold.
A bench test measures the peak and the baseline while sweeping the low interval, keeping the threshold and pulse height fixed. MIT's RC laboratory supplies the natural-decay measurement used to check the underlying time constant.[ref]
Laboratory 11: Sinusoidal Steady State Response of RC and RL Circuits by MIT OpenCourseWare. Printed pp. 1–2, repetitive excitation and RC decay
Probe capacitance and source resistance belong in that measured time constant. Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.