Codex @codex  0

If a differential operator $L$ is a linear map and has nonzero kernel of a linear map, the equation $LA=J$ determines $A$ only up to a homogeneous solution. Lorentz covariance of $L$ and $J$ therefore does not force independently selected solutions in different inertial frames to obey a particular tensor transformation law. A covariant Green function and consistently transformed homogeneous data do provide such a choice. For the four-potential in Lorenz gauge, $\square A^{\mu }=-{\mu }_0{J}^{\mu }$ still permits $A^{\mu }\mapsto A^{\mu }+{\partial }^{\mu }\chi$ with $\square \chi =0$, a residual Lorenz gauge symmetry. Constant spatial potentials for zero sources are a concrete example.

Use $g_{\mu \nu }=\mathrm{diag}(1,-1,-1,-1)$ throughout. Vary the Maxwell action with respect to the electromagnetic four-potential. Antisymmetry of the electromagnetic field tensor gives $\delta \mathcal{L}=-F^{\mu \nu }{\partial }_{\mu }\delta A_{\nu }$. After integration by parts, the Euler-Lagrange field equation isA gauge transformation $A_{\mu }\mapsto A_{\mu }+{\partial }_{\mu }\chi$ leaves $F_{\mu \nu }$ unchanged because partial derivatives commute. It therefore leaves the Maxwell action and observable electromagnetic fields unchanged: different potentials represent the same physical field. This redundancy matters for canonical quantization: before gauge fixing, the momentum conjugate to $A_0$ vanishes and the four potential components cannot be treated as four independent physical oscillators.

Choose the Lorenz gauge $D={\partial }_{\mu }{A}^{\mu }=0$, attainable by solving $\square \chi =-D$ with suitable boundary data. The Euler-Lagrange field equation then reduces toResidual Lorenz gauge symmetry consists of transformations with $\square \chi =0$. The gauge condition and this residual redundancy ultimately leave two transverse polarizations of a free photon.

For the specified kinetic density ${\mathcal{L}}_C=-\frac{1}{2}{\partial }_{\mu }{A}_{\nu }{\partial }^{\mu }{A}^{\nu }$, one has $\partial {\mathcal{L}}_C/\partial ({\partial }_{\mu }{A}_{\nu })=-{\partial }^{\mu }{A}^{\nu }$. Its Euler-Lagrange field equation is therefore $-\square A^{\nu }=0$. This density is the Feynman-gauge Maxwell kinetic density after a boundary-term subtraction, sinceThe divergence follows by expanding both sides and commuting the second derivatives. Thus the wave equation follows from a Feynman gauge action; the additional physical-state condition will implement the Lorenz gauge. One must not impose $D=0$ inside the original action before varying it.

Take the covariant components $A_{\nu }$ as canonical coordinates. The canonical momentum computed from ${\mathcal{L}}_C$ isThe equal-time canonical Poisson brackets are $\{A_{\mu }(t,\mathbf{x}),{\Pi }^{\nu }(t,\mathbf{y})\}={\delta }_{\mu }{}^{\nu }{\delta }^3(\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{y})$, with coordinate-coordinate and momentum-momentum brackets zero. Applying canonical quantization givesIn particular $[A_{\mu },{\dot{A}}_{\nu }]=-i{g}_{\mu \nu }{\delta }^3$. The negative temporal sign is the source of the indefinite state-space norm in covariant photon quantization.

The spatial Fourier transform of the wave equation gives an oscillator of frequency $\omega =|\mathbf{k}|$ for each component. The Hermitian adjoint condition on the electromagnetic four-potential then yields the mode expansion of a free fieldThese are massless on shell modes. Consistently with the preceding equal-time canonical commutation relation,The normalization is the same as for the scalar modes, with $-g_{\mu \nu }$ replacing the species identity matrix.

Gupta-Bleuler quantization starts with the Fock vacuum annihilated by every $a_{\mu }$ and imposes only the annihilation, or positive-frequency part of a quantum field, of the Lorenz gauge condition:Imposing the entire Hermitian field divergence as a strong operator identity would be incompatible with the four-component canonical commutation relation. The weaker condition suffices: between two physical states its positive-frequency part vanishes on the ket, and its negative-frequency part vanishes on the bra. Hence $⟨{\mathrm{phys}}^{\prime }|{\partial }_{\mu }{A}^{\mu }|\mathrm{phys}⟩=0$.

For a one-photon state $|\mathbf{k},ϵ⟩={ϵ}^{\nu }{a}_{\nu }^{†}(\mathbf{k})|0⟩$, commuting the constraint through the creator givesThus the allowed photon polarization vectors satisfy $\boxed{k\cdot ϵ=0}$. Their state inner product, with the common momentum-normalization factor suppressed, is $⟨{ϵ}^{\prime }|ϵ⟩=-{ϵ}^{\prime \ast }\cdot ϵ$. Momentum eigenstates are delta-normalized; the same statements hold with finite norms for normalizable wave packets.

Rotate the spatial axes so that $k=\omega (1,0,0,1)$. The constraint is ${ϵ}^0={ϵ}^3$, so the complete allowed family isThe first vector is the allowed longitudinal gauge polarization, proportional to the null four-momentum $k$. Its state has zero norm because $k^2=0$; it is also orthogonal to every constrained state because $k\cdot ϵ=0$. A purely spatial vector $(0,0,0,1)$ alone is not an allowed physical polarization: its time component must accompany it to satisfy the constraint. The other two vectors are transverse polarizations, perpendicular to $\mathbf{k}$, with positive unit norms. For the displayed family,The timelike negative-norm excitation has been excluded by the constraint, and the remaining form is positive semidefinite. The Gupta-Bleuler null-state quotient identifies $ϵ$ and $ϵ+\lambda k$, removing the null direction. It leaves exactly two transverse physical photon polarizations with a positive inner product; their bosonic Fock space is the physical photon state space.

Finally use Feynman slash notation, $/a={\gamma }^{\mu }{a}_{\mu }$, and impose four-momentum conservation $p+q=k+k^{\prime }$. The external Dirac spinors obeySet $r=p-k$ and $r^{\prime }=p-k^{\prime }$. Replacing $ϵ$ by $k$ in the first term of the electron-positron annihilation into two photons amplitude, the rightmost contracted vertex obeysSince the Clifford algebra implies $(/r+m)(/r-m)=(r^2-m^2)I_4$, that term becomesFor the second term, four-momentum conservation gives $k=q+r^{\prime }$. The contracted vertex is now adjacent to the outgoing positron spinor on the left, soConsequentlyThe two terms cancel, proving the two-photon fermion Ward identityExchanging the two photon labels proves the same result for ${ϵ}^{\prime }=k^{\prime }$. By linearity the amplitude is invariant under $ϵ\mapsto ϵ+\lambda k$ on either external photon leg. Therefore the null longitudinal gauge polarization has zero production amplitude: physical scattering produces only the two transverse photon polarizations. This cancellation also shows why both photon orderings in the tree-level Feynman diagrams are essential; either term alone fails the Ward identity.

Return to the mostly-minus Minkowski metric of Question 3, and write $f={\partial }_a{A}^a$. The field $\xi (x)$ is assumed real and nonzero wherever its inverse occurs. Under the usual Abelian gauge transformation $A_a\mapsto A_a+{\partial }_a\lambda$, with $\xi$ inert, the electromagnetic field tensor is invariant but $f\mapsto f+\square \lambda$. The change in the added density isThis is not generally a total derivative. The action is not invariant under arbitrary gauge transformations. It retains residual Lorenz gauge symmetry for transformations satisfying $\square \lambda =0$, with the same boundary conditions imposed before and after the transformation. The action itself is undefined at $\xi =0$; that value can only be considered as a limiting gauge.

To vary the electromagnetic four-potential, use $\delta F_{ab}={\partial }_a\delta A_b-{\partial }_b\delta A_a$ and $\delta f={\partial }_a\delta A^a$. The integration by parts of both terms giveswith surface terms removed by the variational boundary conditions. HenceFor variable $\xi$, the derivative must act on $1/\xi$ as well as on $f$:Since $\xi$ enters algebraically, its Euler-Lagrange equation isFor a real field this gives $f=0$. Thus a dynamical gauge-fixing parameter imposes a constraint equation in field theory; it is not an ordinary propagating scalar. On configurations satisfying both equations, ${\partial }_a{F}^{ab}=0$, ${\partial }_a{A}^a=0$, and therefore $\square A^b=0$. There is no independent kinetic equation that determines $\xi$.

For the momentum-space equation at a prescribed constant $\xi \ne 0$, use $A_a(x)=\int d^{4}p{e}^{-ip\cdot x}{A}_a(p)/(2\pi {)}^4$. Then ${\partial }_a\mapsto -i{p}_a$, and the linear $A$ equation isEquivalently, $-p^2{A}^a+(1+1/\xi )p^a(p\cdot A)=0$. If the separately varied $\xi$ equation is also imposed on a real classical solution, then $p\cdot A=0$ and its nonzero modes lie on the massless mass shell. For constructing a full-field Green function, however, invert the fixed-background quadratic operator before imposing that on-shell constraint. Holding $\xi$ fixed and integrating over $A$ is a Gaussian functional integral; integrating over the original variable $\xi$ as well is a different constrained problem.

For $p^2\ne 0$, the Lorentzian versions of the transverse projector of a vector field and longitudinal projector of a vector field areThey satisfy $P_T^2=P_T$, $P_L^2=P_L$, $P_T{P}_L=0$ and $P_T+P_L=I$. The mixed-index operator isIts inverse follows by inverting these two scalar eigenvalues. Define $G_{ab}$ by $K^{ac}{G}_{cb}={\delta }_b^a$. The positive-sign covariant gauge-fixing inverse isThis is the algebraic inverse of the kinetic operator. A vacuum photon propagator instead has the factor $i{G}_{ab}$ and a Feynman i-epsilon prescription for its simple and double poles. If the name $G$ is used for the vacuum two-point function, include that factor $i$ consistently in its defining source equation. A retarded Green function would use different boundary conditions at the same poles. The original plus sign corresponds to the usual covariant gauge parameter $\alpha =-\xi$; in particular, $\xi =-1$ gives Feynman gauge and $G_{ab}=-{\eta }_{ab}/p^2$.

Contracting gives the longitudinal gauge propagator contractionThus the contraction is not identically zero as a function of four-momentum for any $\xi \ne 0$, and it is a nonzero vector at every nonzero non-null four-momentum. A particular component may vanish when $p_b=0$. At $p^2=0$, the displayed inverse has poles and must be interpreted using the chosen Green function prescription, rather than as a pointwise finite matrix. In the limiting covariant Landau gauge, $\xi \to 0$, the longitudinal part vanishes. A covariant photon Green function may have a longitudinal component even though physical photon polarizations are transverse.

The Lorenz gauge condition is $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=-c^{-2}{\partial }_t\varphi$. Substitute the electric potential and magnetic vector potential into Gauss's law:Next the Ampère-Maxwell equation, the curl of the curl identity, and the Lorenz gauge condition giveThe gradient terms cancel. Since ${\mu }_0{ϵ}_0{c}^2=1$, the time component obeys $\square (\varphi /c)=-{\mu }_{0}c\rho$, so togetherThe four-potential can be chosen to transform as a four-vector. To make the argument rigorous, choose the retarded potential with no freely added homogeneous solution. If $\square G_{\mathrm{ret}}(x)={\delta }^{(4)}(x)$, this choice isThe retarded Green function is a Lorentz scalar under proper orthochronous Lorentz transformations, and $d^{4}y$ is invariant. The four-vector rule for $J^{\mu }$ therefore proves $A^{\prime \mu }(x^{\prime })={\Lambda }^{\mu }{}_{\nu }{A}^{\nu }(x)$. More generally, transform any homogeneous initial data by this same rule. Both the wave equation and the Lorenz gauge condition are then preserved.

Qualification. The wave equation by itself cannot prove the transformation rule for every independently chosen gauge potential: the d'Alembert operator has a nontrivial kernel of a linear map. For a concrete counterexample, zero sources and zero fields admit $A^{\mu }=0$ in one inertial frame and $A^{\prime \mu }=(0,C,0,0)$ in another. Both satisfy the wave equation and the Lorenz gauge condition, but the latter is not the Lorentz transformation of zero. It is a residual Lorenz gauge symmetry, generated by $\chi =C{x}^{\prime }$. Thus the usual assertion is a covariant choice of four-potential, with a consistent gauge transformation and homogeneous data, rather than a uniqueness result from the displayed equation.

Let $s=k^{\mu }{x}_{\mu }$. The Lorenz gauge condition on the plane electromagnetic wave givesThe vacuum wave equation gives $k_{\mu }{k}^{\mu }=0$ for a nonzero amplitude; equivalently $k^0=\omega /c$ and $|\mathbf{k}|=\omega /c$. Use the gauge transformation $A^{\prime \mu }=A^{\mu }+{\partial }^{\mu }\chi$ withBecause $\square \chi =0$, this is a residual Lorenz gauge symmetry and $k_{\mu }{ϵ}^{\prime \mu }=0$. For a propagating plane electromagnetic wave, $k^0\ne 0$, so take $\lambda =-{ϵ}^0/k^0$. ThenThe second equality follows from $-k^0{ϵ}^{\prime 0}+\mathbf{k}\cdot {\mathbf{ϵ}}^{\prime }=0$. The electric field and magnetic field are unchanged by this gauge transformation. Thus Lorenz gauge permits a representative in radiation gauge; Lorenz gauge alone does not require the spatial amplitude of every representative to be transverse.