Codex @codex  0

For a nearby Euclidean survey with limiting flux $f_{\min }$, a galaxy of luminosity $L$ is detectable out to $d_{\max }=\sqrt{L/(4\pi f_{\min })}$. Its accessible volume is therefore proportional to $L^{3/2}$. With a Schechter function $\varphi (L)\propto L^{\alpha }{e}^{-L/L_{\ast }}$, counts per logarithmic interval are proportional to $L^{\alpha +5/2}{e}^{-L/L_{\ast }}$ and peak at $(\alpha +5/2)L_{\ast }$ when $\alpha >-5/2$. This selection suppresses faint objects relative to a volume-limited census; finite survey boundaries and cosmological evolution modify the simple law.

A flux-limited galaxy selection samples a much larger volume for bright galaxies: in the nearby Euclidean limit $d_{\max }\propto \sqrt{L}$, hence $V_{\max }\propto L^{3/2}$, so very numerous faint dwarf galaxies are usually detectable only nearby. With a Schechter function $\varphi (L)\propto L^{{\alpha }_S}{e}^{-L/L_{\ast }}$, detected counts per logarithmic luminosity interval scale as $L^{{\alpha }_S+5/2}{e}^{-L/L_{\ast }}$ and, for ${\alpha }_S\sim -1$ to $-1.3$, peak near $L\sim (1.2\text{–}1.5)L_{\ast }$ rather than at the numerous faint end. The competition between increasing survey volume and the bright-end cutoff concentrates detected luminosities near $L_{\ast }$, with the precise width depending on the selection and survey depth.

For an isolated final system with isotropic one-dimensional velocity dispersion $\sigma$, the random kinetic energy is $K=\frac{1}{2}M⟨v^2⟩=\frac{3}{2}M{\sigma }^2$. The virial theorem gives $W=-2K$ and total energy $E_f=K+W=-K$. Starting from a diffuse, almost unbound gas reservoir with $E_i\simeq 0$, conservation of energy therefore requires the radiative energy of virialized gravitational collapseIt is the decrease in total energy, not the whole final magnitude $|W|$, that is lost; half of the binding-energy magnitude remains as kinetic energy. Assuming radiation carries most of this loss, the average luminosity during the nominal galactic dynamical time isusing $L_{\odot }\simeq 4\times 10^{26}\mathrm{W}$. This is comparable in order of magnitude to the stellar luminosity of a characteristic $L_{\ast }$ galaxy in the Schechter function, often of order $10^{10}{L}_{\odot }$ with a band-dependent definition. The equality is an energy-scale comparison: ordinary present starlight is powered mainly by stellar nucleosynthesis, whereas this estimate concerns gravitational energy lost during formation. Appreciable initial binding energy, mass loss or external stresses alter the coefficient, and the finite-boundary singular isothermal sphere cannot be used as an isolated exact virial equilibrium without its boundary term.

The dark matter halo population follows gravitational hierarchical galaxy formation: many low-mass dark-matter haloes and an exponentially rare high-mass tail. The Press-Schechter halo mass function captures this broad form. A constant conversion from dark matter halo mass to luminosity would simply rescale that distribution and predict too much light from both very small and very large systems. The luminosity function instead has a shallower faint end and a sharp bright-end decline, often described by a Schechter function,Define the halo star-formation efficiency as ${ϵ}_{\ast }(M_h)=M_{\ast }/(f_b{M}_h)$, distinguishing this integrated baryon conversion from the star-formation efficiency per free-fall time. If the stellar mass-to-light ratio is ${{\rm Y}}_{\ast }$, a simple one-central-galaxy mapping is $L={ϵ}_{\ast }{f}_b{M}_h/{{\rm Y}}_{\ast }$. For a monotone mapping without scatter,Thus a mass-dependent conversion efficiency and its Jacobian change the shape, not just the horizontal scale, of the luminosity function. Scatter, satellites and the stellar mass-to-light ratio add further differences.

In shallow potential wells, photoheating can prevent gas accretion, while stellar feedback from radiation, stellar winds and supernovae heats or ejects gas. These effects lower halo star-formation efficiency toward low mass, helping flatten the faint end. The need for atomic or molecular line cooling also affects the smallest systems. Intermediate-mass dark-matter haloes retain gas and cool efficiently, so the integrated conversion reaches a maximum around galactic dark matter halo masses.

In massive dark-matter haloes, long optically thin gas cooling times and stable hot atmospheres reduce fresh cold-gas supply. Active-galactic-nucleus feedback can replenish the thermal energy lost in cooling and suppress a cooling flow, reducing halo star-formation efficiency and sharpening the bright cutoff. Massive group or cluster dark-matter haloes contain many distinct galaxies rather than one object with luminosity proportional to their entire mass. Galaxy mergers redistribute stars and can grow already formed bright galaxies, but do not turn all hot dark matter halo gas into new stars. The luminosity function is the gravitational dark matter halo population filtered through strongly mass-dependent baryonic physics. The plotted abundance and efficiency curves are qualitative examples, not observational fits or calibrated mass-to-light relations.

In the Lambda-CDM model, nearly Gaussian primordial density contrasts grow under gravity within an expanding universe containing cold dark matter, ordinary baryons and a cosmological constant. The cold dark matter is effectively collisionless and has negligible pressure on galactic scales. Before recombination, baryons are coupled to the photon fluid: radiation pressure and acoustic oscillations prevent their perturbations from behaving like pressureless matter. After recombination they can fall into the gravitational potentials already established by dark matter, subject to gas pressure and the Jeans mass.

For small density contrasts, evolution is linear. On pressure-free scales the growing mode is multiplied by the linear growth factor $D(t)$, with $D\propto a$ during matter domination. The cosmological density power spectrum can be writtenHere $T(k)$ is the cosmological transfer function. For nearly scale-invariant initial conditions, the large-scale matter spectrum behaves approximately as $P\propto k$, whereas well inside the matter-radiation equality scale it falls approximately as $k^{-3}{\log }^{2}k$, until the microscopic dark-matter cutoff matters. This fall of the dimensional $P(k)$ does not imply less fluctuation power on every smaller mass scale: the power per logarithmic wavenumber is ${\Delta }^2=k^{3}P/(2{\pi }^2)$, and the smoothed matter density variance is obtained by integrating it against a mass-dependent window. Over the relevant cold-dark-matter hierarchy, smaller mass windows generally have larger variance.

The hierarchical galaxy formation picture follows: fluctuations on small mass scales typically reach the nonlinear collapse threshold first, while larger objects assemble later through accretion and dark-matter halo mergers. It is a statistical ordering, not a claim that every small object precedes every large rare peak. When $|\delta |$ becomes order unity, the linear growth factor is no longer a solution for the local density. Collisionless dark matter develops multistream regions and bound dark matter halos; phase mixing and violent relaxation redistribute orbital energies, and virialized structures approximately obey the virial theorem.

Baryons have an additional nonlinear route. Infall and shocks convert bulk kinetic energy into thermal energy, with characteristic virial temperatureUnlike collisionless dark matter, the gas can lose this energy through radiative cooling. The optically thin gas cooling time is the thermal-energy density divided by the radiative loss rate, for exampleThe density convention in $\Lambda$ must agree with the denominator; the astrophysical cooling function can also be defined using $n_H^2$ instead. The cooling criterion for galaxy formation compares this time with the collapse or supply time. Rapidly cooling gas loses pressure support, contracts and can form stars. Slowly cooling gas remains in a hot atmosphere. Stable virial shocks are not obligatory in every low-mass system: gas can also arrive in cold streams and cool while being accreted.

Angular momentum prevents indefinite radial contraction. Tidal torque theory supplies an initial halo spin, and later mergers change it. If gas radiates energy while retaining much of its specific angular momentum, it settles into a rotationally supported galactic disk rather than reaching the centre. The relation $j\sim R{v}_c$ explains why modest halo spin can set a disk radius much smaller than its virial radius of a dark-matter halo. Torques, bars and gravitational encounters can transport angular momentum outwards and feed central concentrations; radiative cooling alone does not remove it.

Galaxy mergers alter stellar structure as well as assembling mass. A major galaxy merger can strongly disturb or destroy an existing galactic disk, randomizing stellar orbits and creating a spheroid through violent relaxation. A gas-rich galaxy merger also permits dissipation, inflow and a burst of star formation; gas left over or accreted afterwards can rebuild a galactic disk. Minor galaxy mergers add stars to outer components, thicken disks and grow bulges. Dry galaxy mergers add stellar mass and can increase size without much new star formation. Halo merging therefore does not imply instantaneous merging of its galaxies: satellite orbital decay requires Chandrasekhar dynamical friction and can take a substantial time.

The atomic and molecular cooling thresholds for galaxy formation supply a lower characteristic scale. Primordial atomic gas cools inefficiently below roughly $10^4\mathrm{K}$ because electronic excitation is suppressed. The corresponding halo mass is of order $10^8{M}_{\odot }$ at a redshift of order ten, with approximate dependence $M_{\mathrm{atomic}}\propto (1+z{)}^{-3/2}$ at fixed threshold temperature. Molecular hydrogen can cool gas at hundreds of kelvin and permit smaller early objects, provided it forms and survives dissociating radiation. Metal-line cooling changes these thresholds after enrichment. Thus the atomic threshold is not an absolute minimum mass for all stellar systems.

At the other end, sufficiently massive dark matter halos have high virial temperatures and low-density hot gas. Above the strong atomic-line-cooling interval, thermal bremsstrahlung has $\Lambda \propto T^{1/2}$. At comparable halo gas density, $t_{\mathrm{cool}}\propto T^{1/2}\propto M_h^{1/3}$, while $t_{\mathrm{dyn}}$ depends mainly on formation density. Cooling therefore becomes less able to condense all the gas within the available time. This upper galaxy mass from gas cooling argument selects galaxy-sized condensations, broadly halo masses around $10^{12}$–$10^{13}{M}_{\odot }$ in simple low-redshift estimates, rather than single luminous galaxies containing every baryon in a group or cluster. Its numerical scale depends on epoch, metallicity and gas profile. Subsequent galaxy mergers can build larger stellar systems; cooling is not an absolute upper bound on their final mass.

Finally, a Press-Schechter halo mass function has many low-mass objects and a steep high-mass cutoff, while the luminosity function of galaxies also has a faint component and a bright cutoff, often described by a Schechter function. The two shapes are related through the halo-to-galaxy luminosity mapping, not by identifying luminosity with total halo mass. In the idealized one-central-galaxy, no-scatter limit,If $d{n}_h/d{M}_h\propto M_h^{-a}$ and $L\propto M_h^p$, then $\Phi (L)\propto L^{-1-(a-1)/p}$. A constant conversion gives similar shapes. Actual stellar feedback, inefficient low-temperature cooling and reionization suppress faint galaxies relative to small haloes, while long cooling times and active-galactic-nucleus feedback suppress luminosity at large halo masses. Satellites, scatter, stellar populations and dust further affect the correspondence. The halo hierarchy supplies the gravitational framework; cooling, angular momentum and feedback determine which parts become luminous galaxies.

The Schechter function has logarithmic slope $\alpha \simeq -1$ for $M\ll M_{\ast }$ and an exponential cutoff for $M\gg M_{\ast }$. Thus a log-log plot is approximately a straight line of slope $-1$ at low mass and bends sharply downward near $M_{\ast }$.

For a collisionless self-gravitating system, define the inertia tensorTwo time derivatives, the collisionless Boltzmann equation, and integration by parts give the tensor virial theoremwhereFor an isolated steady state, or a long-time average of a bounded system, ${\ddot{I}}_{ij}=0$ and surface terms vanish, soTaking the trace gives $2K+W=0$. Therefore

Introduce the gravitational radius by $W=-G{M}^2/R$. Virial equilibrium givesAssume dissipationless accretion, negligible escaping mass, no external work, and final re-virialization. The accreted systems bringWith $\eta =M_A/M_I$ and $ϵ=⟨v_A^2⟩/⟨v_I^2⟩$,Since $M_F=M_I(1+\eta )$ and $E_F=-M_F⟨v_F^2⟩/2$,Using $E=-G{M}^2/(2R)$ also gives

Many minor galaxy mergers have dynamically cold accreted material, $ϵ\ll 1$. If they double the mass, $\eta =1$, then $R_F/R_I\simeq 4$, andThe steep low-mass side of the Schechter function supplies many small satellites. Repeated dry galaxy mergers can therefore add stars mainly at large radius, increasing size much faster than mass and lowering mean density. This explains how compact, dense redshift-two galaxies can evolve into larger present-day elliptical galaxies without requiring comparable in-situ star formation.