Codex @codex  0

oxidative addition inserts Pt into one B–Br bond. All three B–Br positions of the starting ring are equivalent, so there is no distinct choice among them before the first substitution. The product is the square-planar Pt(II) boryl bromide $\mathrm{trans}-[\mathrm{Pt}(\mathrm{PC}{\mathrm{y}}_3{)}_2(\mathrm{Br})({\mathrm{B}}_3\mathrm{B}{\mathrm{r}}_2{\mathrm{N}}_3{\mathrm{H}}_3)]$, with the two phosphines trans, the Pt–B bond trans to Pt–Br, and the six-membered ring intact. The third panel shows this connectivity. This is a metal–boron sigma bond, not attachment of the whole ring as an ${\eta }^6$ pi ligand. Formal electron counting gives Pt(II), $d^8$, with $8+4_{\mathrm{P}}+2_{\mathrm{Br}}+2_{\mathrm{boryl}}=16$ electrons, appropriate for square-planar coordination. The primary synthesis establishes this trans-bromo(borazinyl) structure.^[ref]

The electron-rich Pt(0) reacts at the polarized B–Br bond, whose electrophilic boron and departing bromide provide a favorable bond-activation pathway. This accounts for B functionalization without needing cleavage of a ring B–N bond or selection of a nitrogen-bound product. It does not imply that arbitrary N–H activation is impossible under every condition.

Replacing an electronegative bromine substituent by a metal fragment changes the boron's electron demand. Relative to the B–Br sites, the metal-bound boron is less effective at accepting N-to-B pi donation, so its adjacent B–N bonds are expected to have less multiple-bond character and be longer; donation toward the remaining B–Br sites produces compensating unequal ring bonds. The original threefold equivalence is lost. The detailed lengths depend on the full electronic structure; a localized drawing with three rigid alternating double bonds would conceal the redistribution that the unequal lengths reveal.

In the chromium complex, Cr(0) is $d^6$ and receives substantial donation from four carbonyl ligands. Its occupied orbitals can give pi backbonding into the boron-rich acceptor orbitals of the B${}_2$N${}_2$ ring, while the nitrogen-rich occupied ring orbitals donate to the metal. This favors binding across the ring face, approximately ${\eta }^4$, with all four ring atoms participating. A nearly planar ring maintains the p-orbital alignment needed for that interaction and accounts for comparable Cr–B and Cr–N distances. A four-electron ring donor also gives the useful count $6_d+8_{\mathrm{CO}}+4_{\mathrm{ring}}=18$.

Ti(IV) in TiCl${}_4$ is $d^0$ and strongly electron deficient. It is a good acceptor for the two nitrogen lone pairs, but has no filled $d$ set for comparable backbonding into the boron acceptors. chromium therefore favors a face-bound pi complex, while titanium favors N,N sigma coordination. Donation makes the nitrogen environments more nearly tetrahedral and permits the 2,4-Diazadiboretidine ring to pucker. The borons are not directly bound in the same way, explaining $d(\mathrm{Ti}\cdots \mathrm{B})>d(\mathrm{Ti}-\mathrm{N})$. The distinction follows from electron availability, rather than simply calling every short metal–ring contact a separate ordinary sigma bond.

The nitrite ion is an ambidentate ligand: its Lewis structures leave donor lone pairs on both nitrogen and oxygen. In the N-bound mode, $\mathrm{M}-\mathrm{N}(\mathrm{O}{)}_2$, the nitrogen lone pair makes a sigma bond to the metal, while a suitable unoccupied nitrite molecular orbital can accept metal $d$ electron density by pi backbonding. Thus N-bound nitro is a sigma donor and pi acceptor. The nitrite group remains bent at nitrogen; N coordination does not make it a linear nitrosyl.

In the O-bound mode, $\mathrm{M}-\mathrm{O}-\mathrm{N}=\mathrm{O}$, an oxygen lone pair makes the metal–oxygen sigma bond. A second occupied oxygen orbital can donate sideways into an available metal orbital: O-bound nitrito is a sigma and pi donor, rather than the strong pi acceptor of the N-bound description. oxygen's greater electronegativity lowers its donor orbital energies, but the occupied oxygen orbitals still explain its pi-donor classification. Actual mixing depends on metal oxidation state and geometry.

A further possibility is bidentate coordination, $\mathrm{M}({\kappa }^2\text{-}O,O\text{-}\mathrm{N}{\mathrm{O}}_2)$, with both oxygen atoms attached to one metal. Each attachment has oxygen-to-metal sigma donation; additional pi donation depends on orbital alignment. nitrite can also be a bridging ligand between metals. Neither alternative should be confused with linkage isomerism, which specifically compares attachment through different atoms at the same binding site.

The expected order is B-F > C-F > N-F.

B-F has a large favorable polar/ionic contribution because electron-deficient boron and fluorine have a large electronegativity difference. Fluorine lone-pair donation into boron's empty 2p orbital can additionally strengthen bonding in planar BF${}_3$. C-F is a strong, polar second-row sigma bond, but tetrahedral CF${}_4$ has no equivalent empty carbon 2p acceptor for that pi donation.

N-F has less favorable bond polarity and substantial repulsion between nitrogen and fluorine lone pairs, making it weaker. Invoking occupied boron d orbitals is unnecessary and inappropriate for this second-row comparison.

C-C is strongest; N-N is much weaker despite nitrogen's smaller size. Carbon's effective nuclear attraction and good overlap of compact second-row valence orbitals favor a strong C-C sigma bond. The larger, more electron-deficient boron centres give less effective B-B bonding in the stated molecule, despite its relatively high-s-character trigonal bonding.

In hydrazine, the two neighboring nitrogen lone pairs strongly repel one another, destabilizing the N-N bond. Bond strength therefore cannot be predicted from atomic size alone; lone-pair repulsion explains the especially low N-N value.

This illustrates bonding trends in second-period single bonds.

Graphite: each carbon forms three strong in-plane sigma bonds in an sp${}^2$ honeycomb layer. The remaining p orbitals form delocalized pi bands, allowing electrical conduction especially along the layers. Much weaker interlayer attraction permits sliding, explaining softness without implying weak in-plane C-C bonds.

Carborundum is silicon carbide, SiC. A suitable structure is a three-dimensional, tetrahedrally coordinated covalent network: each Si has four C neighbors and each C four Si neighbors. Strong directional bonding in all directions resists slip and gives hardness. Its filled bonding states are separated from empty states by a substantial band gap, giving low conductivity when pure and undoped.

“Non-conductor” is the intended contrast with graphite; SiC is more precisely a wide-bandgap semiconductor, whose conductivity can change with doping and temperature.

An internally consistent elementary orbital hybridisation model is $s{p}^2$ at carbon and $sp$ at both nitrogen atoms; the hydrogens use $1s$ orbitals. The three carbon hybrids form two C–H sigma bonds and one C–N sigma bond, leaving one perpendicular p orbital. The central nitrogen uses opposite $sp$ hybrids for its two collinear sigma connections, leaving two perpendicular p orbitals for the two pi systems.

At terminal nitrogen, one $sp$ hybrid points toward the central nitrogen and the other houses an axial lone pair. One perpendicular p orbital forms the second, N–N-only pi system; the other participates in the three-atom C–N–N pi system. This description remains the same across both resonance contributors; counting lone-pair domains in just one drawing and assigning a different terminal hybridisation to each contributor would obscure the delocalization. orbital hybridisation is a useful choice of localized basis, not a uniquely measurable label: advanced treatments of diazomethane require a superposition of bonding patterns.^[ref]

The four sigma bonds are the two C–H connections, C–N and N–N, containing eight electrons. A terminal-nitrogen axial lone pair contains two more. Of the remaining six electrons, two occupy an N–N pi bond lying in the molecular plane, while four occupy a perpendicular three-centre four-electron pi bond extending over C–N–N. There are therefore 16 valence electrons in total.

For orientation, a three-site model with equal on-site energy $\alpha$ and adjacent interaction $\beta <0$ gives perpendicular pi levels at $\alpha +\sqrt{2}\beta$, $\alpha$, and $\alpha -\sqrt{2}\beta$. The lower two are doubly occupied and the upper is empty. The middle level has a terminal-end combination with little central-atom amplitude; unequal C and N orbital energies change its coefficients and make it only approximately nonbonding.

The highest occupied molecular orbital is the upper occupied perpendicular pi orbital, with substantial carbon amplitude, broadly above the strongly bonding sigma framework and the lower occupied pi orbitals. It is not the terminal axial nitrogen lone pair. Real diazomethane has C–N bonding and N–N antibonding character in this frontier orbital, rather than being an exactly nonbonding equal-site model. Photoelectron and Rydberg-state experiments support this assignment.^[ref]

In molecular boron trichloride, boron uses three approximately $s{p}^2$ hybrids to form three equivalent B–Cl sigma bonds in a trigonal plane. Its perpendicular empty $2p$ orbital can accept electron density from the compatible combination of filled chlorine $3p$ lone pairs. The resulting pi donation is delocalized over the three B–Cl connections.

In the elementary model, one net pi bond is distributed over three equivalent sigma bonds, giving formal average B–Cl bond order $1+1/3=4/3$. The corresponding resonance contributors each put a B=Cl connection in a different position, with formal negative boron and positive donating chlorine. They do not mean one experimentally distinct double bond and two single bonds. The $4/3$ value is the idealized sigma-plus-delocalized-pi bookkeeping value; a computed bond index need not equal that exact rational number.

The four terminal methyl groups form ordinary Al–C sigma bonds, with formal bond order one. Each of the two bridging methyl carbons connects the two aluminium centres through a three-centre two-electron bond. One occupied bonding combination extends over Al–C–Al; the other combinations are unoccupied in the simple electron-deficient bridge model. A single shared pair therefore supplies one bond in total across the two contacts, giving formal Al–C bridge bond order $1/2$ per contact, compared with one for terminal Al–C.

Each aluminium has approximately tetrahedral, $s{p}^3$-like orbital directions. A terminal methyl carbon uses $s{p}^3$-like orbitals for its three C–H bonds and its Al–C bond. A bridging methyl carbon still uses three directed orbitals for C–H bonding, while its remaining approximately $s{p}^3$ hybrid overlaps with orbitals on both aluminium atoms. This shared bridge avoids placing five independent ordinary two-electron bonds around carbon. The hybrid labels are idealized and the bridge geometry is distorted; the four occupied C–H/bridge orbital directions are not equivalent to five localized carbon bonds.

The total valence count provides a useful check: $2(3)+6(4)+18(1)=48$ electrons. Eighteen C–H bonds use 36, four terminal Al–C bonds use eight, and two three-centre bridges use four. A description assigning a full two-electron bond to each of the four bridging contacts would require too many electrons.

Carbon dioxide is linear, with two equivalent C–O bonds of formal bond order two; its Homo is predominantly oxygen nonbonding and its LUMO is C–O ${\pi }^{\ast }$ antibonding. The carbon uses two opposite $sp$ hybrids for its sigma bonds and two perpendicular p atomic orbitals for pi bonding. A localized $\mathrm{O}=\mathrm{C}=\mathrm{O}$ picture assigns each terminal oxygen an $s{p}^2$ sigma/lone-pair framework and one p orbital for its local pi bond.

In a symmetry-adapted description, each of the two perpendicular sets of oxygen and carbon p functions forms bonding, oxygen-centred nonbonding and antibonding combinations. The occupied nonbonding pair is labelled $1{\pi }_g$ and the lowest empty pi pair $2{\pi }_u^{\ast }$. The latter has appreciable amplitude at carbon, explaining its electrophilic reactivity. Hybridization of a terminal atom with only one bonded neighbour is a choice of localized basis, not an independently measurable bond angle; an alternative oxygen $sp$ plus p basis can represent the same delocalized system.

There are 16 valence electrons: four in the two sigma bonds, four in the two net pi bonds, and eight in the remaining oxygen lone-pair combinations. These local electron counts and the delocalized orbital description are alternative bookkeeping schemes, not additional electrons.

On carbon protonation, the C–N bond length increases and the N–N bond length decreases. Forming the fourth C sigma bond changes the carbon from approximately planar $s{p}^2$ to tetrahedral $s{p}^3$, removing its effective C–N pi bonding. The product is described by ${\mathrm{H}}_3\mathrm{C}-{\mathrm{N}}^{+}\equiv \mathrm{N}$: C–N becomes predominantly single and N–N predominantly triple. The resonance of the unprotonated species makes its actual bond orders intermediate rather than exact integers.

One consistent localized orbital hybridization description uses the Lewis structuresFor methyldiazonium, take C as $s{p}^3$ and both N atoms as $sp$. For diazomethane, the double-bond resonance contributor suggests C as $s{p}^2$, central N as $sp$, and terminal N as $s{p}^2$. The central N uses two opposite $sp$ hybrids for the linear C–N–N sigma bond framework. In the localized double-bond picture, terminal N uses one $s{p}^2$ hybrid for its sigma bond, two for lone pairs, and its remaining p atomic orbital for a pi bond.

These labels specify an approximate bonding construction, not uniquely measurable atomic properties. An alternative representation takes terminal N as $sp$, with one $sp$ lone pair and one p lone pair; the latter can participate in the delocalized C–N–N $\pi$ system. It describes the same resonance more explicitly. Neither construction requires an unpaired electron or a bent central N.

${\mathrm{S}}_4^{2+}$ is approximately square planar; $\mathrm{S}{\mathrm{n}}_5^{2-}$ is a closo trigonal bipyramid. Both have 22 valence electrons, $4(6)-2=22$ and $5(4)+2=22$, but their different local orbital requirements prevent inferring identical shapes from this total alone.

For the sulfur ring, four S–S sigma bonds use eight electrons and four in-plane lone pairs use another eight, leaving six electrons in the perpendicular cyclic pi system. The resulting filled bonding and degenerate nonbonding pi levels give a six-pi-electron aromatic description of a four-membered ring, consistent with equivalent S–S links in the ideal square. The out-of-plane p orbitals are retained; this is not a tetrahedral four-vertex closo cage.

For tin, allocate one mainly s-rich lone pair to each atom. The remaining $22-5(2)=12$ electrons form six skeletal pairs, exactly $n+1$ for $n=5$. Wade's rules therefore predict a trigonal bipyramid, with three equatorial vertices and two axial vertices. The axial pair is not joined by a polyhedral edge; its bonding is part of the delocalized three-dimensional framework. The contrast is a planar aromatic sigma/pi ring versus a three-dimensional multicentre-bonded Zintl cluster, rather than cationic charge alone imposing planarity or anionic charge alone imposing a polyhedron.

Disconnect the tertiary amide into cyclohex-3-ene-1-carboxylic acid and the secondary amine $\mathrm{EtNHCH}(\mathrm{Me})\mathrm{C}{\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{C}{\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{Ph}$. The acid-derived ring is an immediate Diels–Alder disconnection: buta-1,3-diene plus the indicated methyl acrylate gives methyl cyclohex-3-ene-1-carboxylate. Heating, or suitable Lewis-acid activation of the dienophile, forms the two new sigma bonds and leaves the diene's internal double bond as the ring alkene.

Hydrolyse this ester to the acid. Convert it to its acid chloride with oxalyl chloride or thionyl chloride, and react with the secondary amine in the presence of a base to capture HCl. The tertiary amide now contains the complete cyclohexene acyl fragment; direct conjugate addition of the amine to methyl acrylate before ring construction would give the wrong connectivity.

Prepare the amine by reductive amination of 4-phenylbutan-2-one, $\mathrm{MeCOC}{\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{C}{\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{Ph}$, with ethylamine, using sodium triacetoxyborohydride or another iminium-selective reducing system. This places nitrogen on $\mathrm{CH}(\mathrm{Me})$, not on a terminal methylene. If a route from simpler carbon compounds is wanted, crossed aldol condensation of acetone with benzaldehyde gives $\mathrm{MeCOCH}=\mathrm{CHPh}$, and selective C=C reduction gives the required ketone before reductive amination.

The acid branch retains the acrylic carbonyl as the amide carbonyl; the amine branch supplies both N-ethyl and N-(4-phenylbutan-2-yl) substituents. The unlabelled stereogenic centres may be racemic mixture. This sequence separates ring formation from amide formation and avoids invoking uncontrolled alkylation of a tertiary amide nitrogen.

The Hückel orbital charge density and Hückel pi bond order giveEach site receives $1/2$ electron from the lowest orbital and one from the occupied nonbonding subspace, so $n_i=3/2$ at every carbon, summing to six. Relative to one neutral pi electron per carbon this is a pi charge of $-e/2$ at each site.

For adjacent sites, only the lowest orbital contributes, giving $p_{12}=p_{23}=p_{34}=p_{41}=1/2$. For opposite sites the nonbonding contribution reverses the sign: $p_{13}=p_{24}=-1/2$. These non-neighbour negative density-matrix entries are not extra sigma bonds or extra resonance integrals in the Hamiltonian. If only skeletal nearest-neighbour pi bond orders are requested, the four values $1/2$ are the relevant ones.

Let ${\sigma }_L,{\sigma }_R$ be localized bonding orbitals of the two new C–O bonds, and let ${\sigma }_L^{\ast },{\sigma }_R^{\ast }$ be their antibonding partners. Their symmetry combinations areThe two remaining active orbitals are out-of-ring oxygen lone-pair combinations, $n_{\pm }=(p_{y,L}\pm p_{y,R})/\sqrt{2}$. The opposite-phase combination $n_{-}$ is the HOMO in the supplied ordering and $n_{+}$ is HOMO−1. Both are filled, as are the two C–O bonding combinations, givingThe original active-orbital sketches show these phase relations, while the correlation diagram gives a qualitative energy ordering. Precise splittings between unrelated symmetry blocks are not determined by the fragment ionization energies. The retained O–O sigma bond, the C–C sigma bond and the other framework orbitals lie outside this six-orbital active comparison; the eight-electron count does not describe all valence electrons of the product.

An approximately alternating styrene–maleic anhydride copolymer is produced. Its backbone alternates a $-\mathrm{C}{\mathrm{H}}_2-\mathrm{CH}(\mathrm{Ph})-$ segment with the two former alkene carbons of a maleic anhydride unit; those latter carbons remain connected to the intact five-membered cyclic anhydride ring.

Homolysis of benzoyl peroxide supplies initiating free radicals. Cross-propagation between electron-rich styrene and electron-poor maleic anhydride is favored over successive additions of the same monomer. Both carbon–carbon double bonds become backbone sigma bonds, without loss of a small molecule from each monomer. Initiator-derived benzoyloxy or phenyl fragments can occur at chain ends, with carbon dioxide formed when benzoyloxy free radicals decarboxylate.

This is an acid-catalysed alpha-ketol rearrangement. Label the original ketone carbon $C_A$ and the adjacent tertiary alcohol carbon $C_B$. Protonate the oxygen on $C_A$ to activate that carbonyl. The appropriately aligned cage C–C sigma bond attached to $C_B$ migrates onto $C_A$, while the hydroxyl oxygen at $C_B$ supplies its lone pair to form the new $C_B=O$ bond. At the same time the old $C_A=O$ pi bond moves onto oxygen, which becomes the new $C_A$–OH. deprotonation regenerates the acid.

The migration reroutes the bridge rather than removing water: the original alcohol carbon becomes the ketone, and the original ketone carbon becomes the tertiary alcohol. A productive conformation aligns the migrating sigma orbital with the accepting carbonyl pi-star orbital; the oxygen lone pair simultaneously overlaps the developing p orbital at the donor carbon. The cage's geometry controls which adjacent sigma bond has the necessary alignment and which less strained skeletal isomer results. A freely rotating isolated carbocation or a simple proton shift cannot account for the changed cage connectivity.

Tin tetrachloride coordinates the enone carbonyl, lowering the dienophile pi-star energy. Butadiene reacts in an endo-oriented Diels–Alder cycloaddition: its terminal carbons bond to the enone's two alkene carbons, its central bond becomes the new cyclohexene double bond, and the enone C=C pi electrons become a new sigma bond. All three bond reorganizations occur in a suprafacial six-electron cycle.

Approach from the face opposite the methyl substituent avoids steric crowding and gives the indicated relationship between methyl and the non-enolizable junction hydrogen. The immediate stereospecific cycloaddition gives a cis-fused junction relationship. The junction carbon next to the ketone can subsequently enolize; reprotonation on either face epimerizes this centre without breaking either newly formed C–C bond. This accounts for the mixture at the wavy-bond position while the other junction and methyl relationship remains fixed. The modest 1.5:1 ratio should not be mistaken for failure of suprafaciality in the cycloaddition itself. Later oxime formation removes the ketone's ordinary enolization pathway and furnishes the depicted isolated junction diastereomer.