Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2025 iii Paper 316 4 v Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
The specific orbital energy changes by , so a marginally bound orbit becomes more tightly bound. Neglecting its tiny initial binding energy,
To obtain the new periapsis, put and . Immediately after the encounter,Using the post-encounter energy and angular momentum in the Kepler orbit relations and retaining givesThe inward radial kick therefore lowers the next periapsis as well as shrinking the semi-major axis.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2026 iii Paper 316 1 b Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
Put . Since , the radial equation becomes the Binet equationwhere primes denote derivatives with respect to the polar angle. Choosing the angular origin at periapsis givesWriting the semi-latus rectum as yields the Kepler orbitHence the specific angular momentum and specific orbital energy are
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2026 iii Paper 316 1 d Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
Let be the speed of the circular Kepler orbit at radius . The release velocity relative to the planetesimal isThe particle starts at the same position as its parent, so the change in specific orbital energy isUsing the velocity components from part (c),Since and , rearrangement gives
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2026 iii Paper 316 1 f Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
An orbit is unbound precisely when its specific orbital energy is nonnegative, equivalently . At periapsis, , and for the condition from part (d) isThe directions are sampled from the uniform distribution on a circle. The fraction satisfying is ; setting it equal to gives . ThereforeThe positive root is
Perturbed Kepler-orbit conservation laws 2026-10-05
If the relative acceleration is , with constant masses, then the specific orbital energy , specific angular momentum and eccentricity vector obeyThe inverse-square-force terms cancel in each derivative. These identities express perturbing work and torque, and track the instantaneous change of the ellipse's shape and orientation.
For a stationary collisionless stellar system confined to a plane, velocity isotropy makes the galactic distribution function depend on speed through . The Collisionless Boltzmann equation implies , hence with specific orbital energy . This conclusion requires stationarity as well as isotropy.
Planetary ejection of a comet Created 2026-10-05 Updated 2026-10-06
A gravitational assist ejects a weakly bound comet when the increase in its specific orbital energy exceeds its binding energy. For near-parabolic coplanar encounters, the weak-deflection ejection impact parameter scales as . Combining this with the phase-mixed comet surface density gives a one-encounter ejection time proportional to , within the local two-body encounter approximation.
If transverse kinetic energy is dissipated at the downstream axis, the remaining specific orbital energy is . Binding requires , corresponding to incident impact parameter . Integrating the captured mass flux gives the Bondi--Hoyle--Lyttleton accretion rate.
Stellar flyby 2026-10-06
A passing star perturbs a planetary or cometary system through its differential Newtonian gravitational field. A distant encounter is predominantly tidal; a sufficiently close one can substantially change specific orbital energy and angular momentum, eject a comet, or shift its periapsis into or out of the planetary region.
The same initial distance can lead to strikingly different orbits. Let and launch tangentially in one orbital plane. Then periapsis is the launch point, specific angular momentum is , andwhere is true anomaly. These follow by combining the initial specific orbital energy with the orbital eccentricity relation and the Kepler orbit equation. With and , the initial speeds , , , and give : a circular orbit, an elliptic orbit with apoapsis distance , a parabolic trajectory, and a hyperbolic Kepler orbit. The two open paths have asymptotic speeds zero and respectively. Their different directions at large distance are part of the Kepler orbit, not an extra scalar escape threshold.
Tangential launches give circular, elliptic, parabolic, and hyperbolic Kepler orbits
. All panels use equal spatial scales, a fixed attracting centre at the origin, a launch point , and an initially upward velocity. The gray body's radius is stipulated as , so all displayed paths remain exterior. Colored solid curves follow motion after launch; dashed curves on the open orbits are their incoming extensions, not an additional part of the launch. Open curves continue beyond the viewing window. The normalized launch speeds and specific orbital energies are computed from the stated isolated model. Details. Two-body orbital energy 2026-10-06
In the centre-of-mass frame of two Newtonian point masses, total orbital energy is reduced mass times specific orbital energy: . The factor multiplies both kinetic and potential contributions, while is the relative gravitational parameter.
Two-integral galactic distribution function Created 2026-10-07 Updated 2026-10-14
A stationary axisymmetric galactic distribution function depending on the specific orbital energy and axial specific angular momentum is a two-integral distribution. These quantities are conserved in a time-independent axisymmetric Newtonian gravitational potential, so the Collisionless Boltzmann equation holds by the chain rule. Even dependence on removes net azimuthal streaming velocity; an odd part can supply rotation without changing the mass density.
Velocity kick on a circular Kepler orbit Created 2026-10-06 Updated 2026-10-14
For an instantaneous in-plane change of velocity of magnitude on a circular orbit, with angle measured from the forward tangential direction, the new specific orbital energy gives . The specific angular momentum gives . The signed semi-major axis becomes negative for an unbound hyperbolic Kepler orbit.
For a Keplerian disk, let be the total loss through both faces per unit projected area and the inward accretion rate. Annular mass conservation gives . A circular orbit has specific orbital energy , so a marginally escaping wind requires additional energy per unit lost mass. Equating this sink to a fraction of the two-face viscous dissipation gives the displayed relation. If the wind carries the local specific angular momentum , conservation of angular momentum gives , with viscous torque in an accretion disk . Eliminating the torque yields .
Zero-energy escape takes infinite time 2026-10-14
“Arrives at infinity with zero speed” is an asymptotic statement. For outward radial motion at zero specific orbital energy,Every finite distance takes finite time, but as . There is no instant of rest at an infinitely distant destination. Differentiating the displayed solution gives , independently checking Newton's second law. In the synthetic example, reaching takes exactly . For nonzero specific angular momentum, the Barker equation gives the corresponding infinite-time limit along a parabolic trajectory. Positive-energy escape also takes infinite time to reach infinity; it retains nonzero asymptotic speed.
