For a stellar polytrope of index , write and combine hydrostatic equilibrium with mass conservation to obtain
Introduce Lane-Emden variables for a stellar polytrope, , and , where
Since , the mechanical equation reduces to the Lane-Emden equation
A constant-density interior corresponds to the formal polytrope of index zero, with where . At , regularity first gives , and a second integration gives
Here and , reproducing . The mass density jumps from its constant interior value to zero at the surface, while pressure vanishes continuously. The relation is singular at ; the regular dimensionless pressure/mass density formulation defines this incompressible structural limit. It does not mean that the gas's perturbative stellar adiabatic exponent is infinite: the hydrostatic ideal-gas toy model and its adiabatic response are distinct choices.
For an old, approximately solar-composition H/He object with no strong irradiation or ongoing heat input, the cold mass-radius relation reaches a broad maximum of order one Jupiter radius, nominally about --, at a few Jupiter masses. This is a property of that composition and low-entropy sequence, not a composition-independent theorem from hydrostatic equilibrium alone. Young isolated substellar objects can be larger while cooling; strict thermal steady state of a non-burning isolated body would require its internal luminosity to vanish.
Figure 1.
Schematic mass-radius sequence from ice giants to low-mass stars with composition and degeneracy slope guides
. Details.
At low mass, an incompressible fixed-composition approximation gives , so . Ice giants contain dense heavy material and modest H/He envelopes, so real radii depend strongly on composition and are not obtained by extending a pure-hydrogen curve through them.
Gas giants approach a regime in which Coulomb interactions, compression and partial electron degeneracy pressure compete. An approximate index-one stellar polytrope, , gives at fixed , explaining the broad Jupiter-sized plateau. In the nonrelativistic degenerate limit, is an index- stellar polytrope, giving at fixed composition. This is a limiting slope; finite-temperature brown dwarfs do not follow that exact power law over their entire observed mass range.
The general polytropic mass-radius relation displays both limits:
At roughly , deuterium burning becomes possible, with a composition-dependent threshold. This is a conventional planet/brown-dwarf division rather than a unique formation definition. At roughly --, about --, sustained hydrogen burning can support a low-mass star. Its nuclear energy supply maintains a specific entropy that prevents indefinite cooling onto the cold substellar sequence; its approximate main-sequence relation is over a limited low-mass interval.
Ice giants chiefly lose formation heat and some gravitational/radiogenic energy, with convection in fluid regions and thermal conduction or inhibited convection where composition stratifies the interior. Gas giants and non-burning brown dwarfs radiate stored heat and contraction energy; their deep interiors are largely convective, with radiative photospheres. Helium separation can supply extra gravitational energy in mature giant planets, while brown dwarfs above the deuterium threshold have a temporary nuclear contribution. Low-mass stars are powered primarily by hydrogen fusion and are largely or fully convective at the lowest stellar masses. The transition to sustained fusion is the essential change from a cooling body to a long-lived thermal balance.
A mass-radius curve of solar-composition substellar objects must specify age, irradiation and composition. For a mature, weakly irradiated hydrogen–helium sequence, the qualitative mass-radius relation has three main trends:
The conventional deuterium-burning mass near Jupiter masses marks a commonly used giant-planet/brown dwarf classification scale, not a sharp discontinuity in radius or a universal formation boundary. Young brown dwarfs are larger and cool by contraction; irradiation, a heavy-element core and hot-Jupiter radius inflation shift planets away from a single solar-composition curve.
The drawing is a qualitative mature sequence, not an interpolation of a specified evolutionary model grid. Three relevant observations, using representative historical measurements, are:
Gas-giant radius growth gives way to a nearly Jupiter-sized compressed branch, followed by rising radii in hydrogen-burning stars.
Consider a spherical stellar polytrope with , constant , , zero surface pressure and finite radius . Its specific enthalpy, measured from zero density, is . Hydrostatic equilibrium gives . Integrating over mass therefore yields
The static stellar virial theorem gives , and eliminating the pressure integral proves the gravitational energy of a stellar polytrope:
For an ideal gas with constant specific-heat ratio, the accompanying internal energy is
To express both energies using alone one additionally identifies the model as an adiabatic stellar polytrope, so . Then
For these become and . A general polytropic index need not be determined by the thermodynamic specific-heat ratio; without the adiabatic identification both and remain.
At the centre, spherical symmetry and regularity require a finite central density and
At the stellar surface , the pressure vanishes:
For a stellar polytrope these become the dimensionless conditions , , and the surface is the first zero ; specifying fixes the overall scale.
Radiative diffusion in a star can be written
Dividing by hydrostatic equilibrium gives
which is constant by assumption. Since both and vanish at the surface, integration gives with constant .
Eliminating between the gas and radiation equations of state now gives
Thus the star is an stellar polytrope. Put
The structure equations become the Lane-Emden equation
The surface is the first zero . Writing
the Lane-Emden mass formula gives
Therefore
where
The additional radiative-equilibrium relation is .
For a spherical stellar polytrope with , the Lane-Emden equation gives
Eliminating the central density at fixed composition and entropy gives the polytropic mass-radius relation
An incompressible rocky body has and . A moderately massive gas giant is approximately an polytrope and has , explaining its weak radius dependence on mass. In a more strongly degenerate nonrelativistic regime, gives .
Write . The supplied approximation and imply
Therefore
and direct logarithmic differentiation gives
Thus the model is locally a stellar polytrope with
Since ,
The radiation-pressure and gas-pressure limits are
Suppose first that the gas-pressure fraction is spatially constant, with . This is a sufficient condition for a stellar polytrope. Since
the ratio gives
Therefore
with
For an ordinary positive polytropic index one also assumes .
The radiative diffusion in a star equation can be written as
Because and is constant, hydrostatic equilibrium gives
Equating them and using yields
For , the specific enthalpy is
Hydrostatic equilibrium says . Taking a Laplacian and using the gravitational Poisson equation gives the Helmholtz equation
For a spherical star, regularity at the centre selects the stellar polytrope
Its first zero is , hence
Direct integration gives , and therefore
On the cube, the separated positive solution
vanishes on all six faces. It solves the same Helmholtz equation when
The mean of each sine over is , so
The interior fields formally solve the local structure equations, but an isolated fluid surface must be an equipotential and its interior gravitational field must match a decaying exterior solution with continuous normal derivative. A cube does not satisfy the global free-boundary conditions for a nonrotating self-gravitating barotrope. Such sharp planar faces and edges are also not observed in stars; ordinary pressure and gravity smooth the body toward a sphere.
A stellar polytrope of index obeys
Combining hydrostatic equilibrium, , with mass conservation, , gives the Lane-Emden equation
Regularity and normalization at the stellar centre require
Integrating the Lane-Emden equation from the centre then gives the enclosed mass
For , direct substitution into the equation finds
so and . This profile has no finite first zero and hence has infinite radius, but its total mass converges:
Its mean density over the full, infinite configuration is consequently zero.
For a perfect gas, , so . The luminosity from CNO cycle burning with is therefore
where
Thus is of order unity. The model is physically poor because the polytrope has infinite radius and zero mean density, while strongly temperature-sensitive CNO burning changes the thermal gradient and commonly creates convection. Real cores also have evolving composition, non-polytropic opacity and energy transport, and boundaries supplied by the surrounding star.
Polytrope of index one Created 2026-10-05 Updated 2026-10-07
A stellar polytrope with polytropic index one has in hydrostatic equilibrium. Combining this with the Poisson equation for Newtonian gravity gives the Helmholtz equation
The spherical solution regular at the origin is . Its first zero gives , independent of central mass density, and .