Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2013 iii Paper 7 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
We prove Kantorovich duality theorem here by a positive-functional extension argument; it produces the minimizing transport plan at the same time as equality of the values. Let and . This is a bounded continuous function because is a compact metric space. Write for the real space of continuous functions on a compact space, and letOn this vector subspace define . It is well-defined: two representations differ by a constant in the first variable and the opposite constant in the second, and both measures have mass one. It is positive, since implies and hence . Also .
Define the majorant envelope, which is a sublinear functional:Constants majorize every , and positivity gives , so this quantity is finite. Taking approximate minimizing majorants proves subadditivity; rescaling majorants proves positive homogeneity. Moreover for , and subtracting from a majorant provesThe dual value in the question is exactlySubadditivity at gives .
On , assign the value to . If the representation is unique. If , then , so the assignment is still well-defined. It is dominated by : for , use ; for , positive homogeneity gives . Together with the translation identity, these verify domination in both cases.
The real Hahn-Banach theorem extends this functional to with . If , then , so . Thus is a positive linear functional, with and . Positivity also gives , so is continuous. The Riesz-Markov-Kakutani representation theorem supplies a Borel probability measure on the compact space , satisfying .
For every , its pullback belongs to , so . Likewise . Uniqueness in the Riesz-Markov-Kakutani representation theorem shows that these are exactly the two marginal distributions. Finally, every feasible pair gives a lower bound for the cost of every transport plan, by integration. Our constructed plan achieves that bound:This Kantorovich duality by positive extension establishes the requested existence and equality without assuming an optimal plan in advance.
The metric structure additionally gives the Kantorovich–Rubinstein theorem formulation. For a feasible pair define . The triangle inequality for makes one-Lipschitz continuous, , and . Hence the dual objective is at most . Conversely is feasible for every one-Lipschitz . ThereforeNormalizing for a fixed gives a uniformly bounded equicontinuous family; it is closed and compact in the uniform topology by the Arzela-Ascoli theorem. The objective is uniformly continuous on this family, so the supremum is attained as well. In particular, is the first Wasserstein distance between the two measures.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 ii Paper 1 21F b Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-05
On the one-dimensional linear subspace , define . It is linear and obeys even for negative . The norm on is a sublinear functional, so the real Hahn-Banach theorem extends to a linear functional with for every .
Apply this also to to get . Hence , proving continuity and . At the extension satisfies , forcing the reverse norm inequality. ThereforeThe exclusion of is what ensures that this particular construction attains norm one.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 iii Paper 106 3 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
The Hahn-Banach separation theorem for two convex sets states that disjoint nonempty convex sets in a real locally convex space, with open, admit a nonzero continuous linear functional and such thatThere need not be a positive uniform gap between the two sets.
For a proof, set . It is open and convex, and . Choose , let , and let be the Minkowski functional of . Because is open, convex and contains zero, is a finite sublinear functional, and . Put . Since , . On define . For this equals ; for it is nonpositive and hence at most . The Hahn-Banach theorem extends it to a linear with . Both and are bounded near zero, so this domination makes continuous; it is nonzero because . For ,Thus for every . Define , which is finite because any fixed bounds it above. Openness of and nonzeroness of ensure for every , and for every . This proves the stated separation.
For the sequence criterion, suppose and . If each , thenConversely, the assumed inequality implies that every convex combination of the has norm at least . Hence is disjoint from . Apply the separation theorem with the open set to obtain andThen has norm one and satisfies for every . ThereforeThe PDF confirms the “if and only if” that is garbled in the TeX transcription.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2022 ii Paper 2 23G Solution Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-25
Any extension to must have the formChoose satisfyingThis interval is nonempty: for ,which rearranges to the required lower bound being at most the upper bound. For , positive homogeneity reduces
to the upper inequality after replacing by ; for it reduces to the lower inequality. The case is the hypothesis on . Thus this choice gives the required dominated linear extension.
to the upper inequality after replacing by ; for it reduces to the lower inequality. The case is the hypothesis on . Thus this choice gives the required dominated linear extension.
The dominated form of the Hahn-Banach theorem states that a linear functional on a subspace, bounded above by a sublinear functional, extends linearly to the whole real vector space while retaining that bound.
Let . Its coordinate mapsare continuous because every linear map on a finite-dimensional normed space is continuous. Hahn--Banach extends each to
without increasing its norm, and then
without increasing its norm, and then
For an arbitrary finite-dimensional subspace , choose a basis and these extended coordinate functionals. Thenis closed. Every has the decompositionApplying every shows , so