Codex @codex  0

Two compact connected symplectic surfaces are symplectomorphic exactly when their genus of a surface and symplectic area agree. The sufficiency follows from Moser theorem applied to a positive interpolation of their symplectic forms after an orientation-preserving diffeomorphism.

A symplectomorphism of a closed symplectic surface carries the complementary components of a separating simple closed curve to those of its image, preserving their unordered symplectic areas. On the unit sphere a latitude at height $h$ has complementary areas $2\pi (1-h)$ and $2\pi (1+h)$. Thus the equator cannot be sent to any nonequatorial latitude.

For a smooth map between Riemannian manifolds, its Dirichlet energy is half the integral of the squared norm of its differential, using the source and target metrics. When the source is two-dimensional, a conformal change of its metric leaves this energy unchanged. For a J-holomorphic curve into a symplectic manifold with a compatible almost complex structure, the Energy identity for a J-holomorphic curve identifies it with the pulled-back symplectic area. The norm of a differential here is the full tensor norm, summing its squared values on an orthonormal source frame.

For a compact symplectic manifold, smooth convergence of tame almost complex structures and a uniform area bound give a subsequence of J-holomorphic spheres converging, after reparametrization, to a finite tree of J-holomorphic spheres, with convergence smooth away from finitely many bubbling points. The total homology class and symplectic area are preserved. Constant components may be added for stability. In a spherical class which cannot split into two positive-area spherical classes, there is only one nonconstant component.

For the symplectic form $\omega =idz\wedge d\bar{z}/(1+|z{|}^2{)}^2$, the circle group rotates $z$ by $e^{i\theta }$. Its real generator is $K=iz{\partial }_z-i\bar{z}{\partial }_{\bar{z}}$. The contraction is ${\iota }_K\omega =-dH$, so $H$ is a Hamiltonian function in this sign convention. In the other chart $w=1/z$, $H=1/(1+|w{|}^2)$, proving smoothness at infinity. Its image is $[0,1]$ with the endpoints at the fixed poles. The symplectic area is $2\pi$; rescaling to the round area $4\pi$ would double this moment function.

Write the standard complex coordinates as $z_j=q_j+i{p}_j$ and let $J$ denote multiplication by $i$. Use the standard symplectic form ${\omega }_0={\sum }_{j}d{q}_j\wedge d{p}_j$, for which ${\omega }_0(v,Jv)=|v{|}^2$. In real coordinates $s,t$ on the disk, holomorphicity and the Cauchy-Riemann equations implyTherefore the pulled-back two-form isIf this integral were zero, the continuous nonnegative integrand would vanish everywhere in the interior. The displayed Cauchy-Riemann relation would then make both first derivatives zero, forcing $h$ to be constant on the connected disk and, by continuity, on its boundary. For the nonconstant map under consideration the symplectic area is consequently strictly positive:Take the primitive $\lambda =\frac{1}{2}{\sum }_j(q_{j}d{p}_j-p_{j}d{q}_j)$ from Question 3. Let $c=h{|}_{\partial D^2}$, oriented as the boundary of the disk. Since $c$ lies in $L$, the Stokes theorem givesThe restriction $\lambda {|}_L$ is closed because $L$ is a Lagrangian submanifold. If its Liouville class of a Lagrangian submanifold were zero, it would be an exact differential form, and its integral along every closed curve in $L$ would vanish. The boundary loop above contradicts this. The Liouville class is therefore nonzero. This proves that a holomorphic disk detects a nonzero Liouville class directly by positivity and Stokes; no disk-existence theorem is being assumed beyond the disk given here.

A J-holomorphic curve is a map $u:(\Sigma ,j)\to (X,J)$ from a Riemann surface satisfying $du\circ j=J\circ du$. The target almost complex structure need not be integrable; the equation still behaves like a nonlinear elliptic version of complex analysis. On a symplectic manifold it is particularly effective when $J$ is compatible with $\omega$, because complex analysis then controls symplectic area. The metric construction above supplies such structures and deformations between them.

In conformal coordinates $(s,t)$ with $j{\partial }_s={\partial }_t$, the equation is $u_t=J{u}_s$. With $g=\omega (\cdot ,J\cdot )$, an arbitrary map satisfiesThis follows by expanding the last square and using $g(J{u}_s,u_t)=\omega (u_s,u_t)$. Integrating proves the Energy identity for a J-holomorphic curve. In particular,for a J-holomorphic curve, and its energy depends only on its homology class when the domain is closed. A nonconstant such curve has strictly positive area: its derivative is nonzero somewhere and positivity holds on a neighborhood. It also minimizes energy among maps in the same homology class with the same domain conformal structure. Thus analytic bounds can be obtained from topological information.

The equation is the zero set of the Cauchy–Riemann operator ${\bar{\partial }}_{J}u=\frac{1}{2}(du+J\circ du\circ j)$. Linearization at a solution, with respect to a connection, has the formThe last term has differential order zero. The principal part has the Cauchy–Riemann symbol; in a complex frame a nonzero real covector $(a,b)$ gives multiplication by $a+ib$, an invertible symbol. This establishes ellipticity. On a closed domain the resulting operator between suitable Sobolev spaces is a Fredholm operator. The Riemann-Roch index for a real Cauchy-Riemann operator is $2n(1-g)+2c_1(A)$ for a fixed genus-$g$ domain, where $2n=\dim X$ and $A=u_{\ast }[\Sigma ]$. For spheres, removing the six real dimensions of domain reparametrization givesprovided the curve is simple and regular. Each marked point adds two real dimensions; constraining its image to a specified target point removes $2n$. These are the dimension formula for regular J-holomorphic spheres and its incidence version.

Here regular means that $D_u$ is surjective. Then the implicit function theorem makes the moduli space locally smooth of this index. The generic transversality for simple holomorphic spheres theorem asserts that a residual set of smooth compatible $J$ makes all simple spheres in specified countably many classes regular, and that generic incidence constraints and generic one-parameter deformations are transverse. It does not assert regularity for all multiple covers. This distinction matters whenever one tries to count curves. A primitive class with no positive-area spherical decomposition avoids multiple-cover and bubbling difficulties and permits especially direct counts.

The other central ingredient is Gromov compactness for spheres. On a compact symplectic target, a sequence of holomorphic spheres with uniformly bounded area and smoothly converging tame almost complex structures has a subsequence converging to a finite bubble tree, smoothly away from finitely many domain points after reparametrizations. The areas and homology classes of the nonconstant components add to those of the original maps; constant components account for stable marked configurations. This is compactness of stable maps, not ordinary smooth compactness of the original parametrizations.

The proof mechanism explains why bubbling is indispensable. An elliptic small-energy estimate bounds derivatives on a smaller disc when the energy on a larger disc is sufficiently small. Failure of a derivative bound therefore concentrates a definite amount of energy. Rescale near a point of large derivative; elliptic estimates yield a nonconstant limiting holomorphic map on the plane. Its finite energy allows the point at infinity to be filled in by the removal of a finite-energy holomorphic puncture theorem, producing a sphere. Repeating extracts further spheres. Uniform local monotonicity gives a positive energy threshold for nonconstant bubbles on the compact target, so only finitely many can occur. Estimates on the intervening annuli yield the energy identity and exclude lost neck energy. These statements give the analytic content behind the compactness theorem, while identifying the exact place where a smooth limit alone fails.

A local area estimate turns this existence theory into an embedding obstruction. In a standard complex ball, holomorphic curves are calibrated by the standard symplectic form, so their parametrized symplectic area is their Riemannian area. They are stationary minimal surfaces. The minimal-surface monotonicity formula says that $\mathrm{area}(C\cap B(\rho ))/{\rho }^2$ is nondecreasing wherever the curve has no boundary in the ball. At a point of multiplicity $m$, its limiting density is $m\pi$. Consequently any branch through the centre contributes at least $\pi {\rho }^2$. For a general compatible $J$ there is still a local lower bound $c{\rho }^2$, with $c>0$ depending on controlled geometry. The exact Euclidean constant is the one needed for sharp radius obstructions.

Here is a global existence argument that feeds this estimate. Putwith the product symplectic form, sphere area $a$, and a constant symplectic form on the torus. Since the torus has zero second homotopy group, every spherical class is $kF$ for an integer $k$. A nonconstant holomorphic sphere in this class has area $ka>0$, so $k\ge 1$. A curve of class $F$ cannot split into two nonconstant bubbles, and it cannot be a nontrivial multiple cover. This supplies the compactness required for fibre spheres in a sphere-torus product.

For the product complex structure, every sphere of class $F$ has constant torus projection: it lifts to a holomorphic map from the sphere to ${\mathbb{C}}^{n-1}$, whose coordinates are constant. Its sphere projection has degree one. Thus, up to reparametrization, there is exactly one such sphere through every target point. It is regular because its pulled-back tangent bundle is $\mathcal{O}(2)\oplus {\mathcal{O}}^{n-1}$ on ${\mathbb{CP}}^1$, and the first cohomology of each summand vanishes. Its linearized Dolbeault operator therefore has zero cokernel.

Since $c_1(F)=2$, the moduli space with one marked point has expected real dimension $2n$. Imposing passage through a fixed point gives dimension zero. For generic structures and transverse incidence conditions this is a finite set. Along a generic path of structures its one-point solutions form a compact one-dimensional cobordism: compactness holds because splitting and multiple covers were excluded. Its boundary contains the endpoint solutions. A compact one-manifold has an even number of boundary points, so the count modulo two is unchanged. The product count is one, and hence the count for a generic compatible $J$ is one as well. If the endpoint product structure is not generic for other classes, its regular solutions allow the path argument in this single class. Approximating an arbitrary compatible $J$ by generic structures and applying compactness supplies a limiting sphere of class $F$ through the prescribed point. The nonconstant component still contains that point; there are no nonconstant bubbles to carry it away. This derives the existence assertion needed below without assuming a capacity obstruction.

Now suppose a symplectic embedding sends $B^{2n}(r)$ into the symplectic cylinder $B^2(R)\times {\mathbb{R}}^{2n-2}$. Choose $0<\rho <{\rho }^{\prime }<r$. The image of the closed radius-${\rho }^{\prime }$ ball is compact. For any $a>\pi R^2$, the first factor embeds symplectically into an area-$a$ sphere: in dimension two this is an area-preserving disc chart, leaving a cap of area $a-\pi R^2$. Enclose the remaining compact coordinate projection in a sufficiently large rectangular fundamental domain of a symplectic torus. The compact ball image thereby embeds into $S^2(a)\times T^{2n-2}$.

Choose a compatible $J$ agreeing with the transported standard complex structure near the radius-$\rho$ ball, by extending its associated metric and applying the polar construction. The sphere of class $F$ through the centre has area $a$. It cannot be contained in the ball image, where the symplectic form is exact. Euclidean monotonicity therefore gives $a\ge \pi {\rho }^2$. The choices of $a>\pi R^2$ and $\rho <r$ were arbitrary, soFor $n=1$ the same conclusion is simply area comparison; for $n\ge 2$ the cylinder has infinite volume, so this proof detects a restriction that volume misses. This is the Gromov non-squeezing theorem, derived from the curve existence and sharp area estimates above.

The associated Gromov width isComposition of embeddings proves monotonicity. Rescaling coordinates in a ball proves $c_G(U,c\omega )=c{c}_G(U,\omega )$ for $c>0$. Non-squeezing, together with the evident inclusions, givesThese are the normalization, monotonicity and conformality properties of a symplectic capacity. The two-ball obstruction of Question 5 illustrates a related use: one degree-one curve through two prescribed centres gives an additive area bound, stronger than comparing the volumes of the balls. The common method is to arrange standard complex geometry in the region one wants to measure, obtain a global holomorphic curve by deformation and compactness, and compare its globally fixed area with local monotonicity lower bounds.

Let ${\Phi }_t$ be the local flow of a vector field $V$. The Lie derivative of a differential form is ${\mathcal{L}}_V\eta ={\frac{d}{dt}|}_{t=0}{\Phi }_t^{\ast }\eta$. We prove Cartan's magic formulaBoth sides are degree-zero derivations of an algebra on the exterior algebra of differential forms. They agree on a function $f$, since ${\iota }_{V}df=V(f)$. They also agree on $df$: pullback commutes with the exterior derivative, so ${\mathcal{L}}_{V}df=d(Vf)$, while $(d{\iota }_V+{\iota }_{V}d)df=d(Vf)$. Locally every differential form is a sum of products of functions and coordinate differentials, proving the identity in every degree.

For a compactly supported Hamiltonian vector field $V_H$, take the convention ${\iota }_{V_H}\omega =-dH$. Since $d\omega =0$, Cartan's magic formula gives ${\mathcal{L}}_{V_H}\omega =0$, so its complete flow of a vector field consists of symplectomorphisms. Given $p$ and $v\in T_{p}M$, a bump function lets us choose a compactly supported $H$ with $d{H}_p=-{\iota }_v{\omega }_p$, and hence $V_H(p)=v$. Choose such fields for a basis of $T_{p}M$. Their successive small-time flows give a map with invertible derivative at the origin. The inverse function theorem makes the orbit of $p$ open. Every orbit is open; because $M$ is connected, there is only one orbit. Thus the compactly supported symplectomorphisms act transitively on points, by Hamiltonian transitivity on a connected symplectic manifold.

On the unit sphere, the standard symplectic area is $4\pi$. The equator has complementary disks of areas $2\pi ,2\pi$, whereas the latitude at height $1/2$ has complementary disks of areas $\pi ,3\pi$: the cap above height $h$ has area $2\pi (1-h)$. A symplectomorphism must preserve the unordered pair of complementary areas. Therefore no such symplectomorphism exists, by complementary areas obstruct symplectic equivalence of separating curves.

Geometric quantization starts from a classical symplectic manifold $(P,\omega )$ and seeks a Hilbert space and quantum observables that reflect its geometry. It has two distinct stages: prequantization, which represents the full Poisson algebra on sections of a line bundle, and a choice of polarization in geometric quantization, which reduces the excessive phase-space dependence of those sections.

Use the conventions ${\iota }_{X_f}\omega =df$ and $\{f,g\}=\omega (X_f,X_g)$. A prequantum line bundle is a Hermitian line bundle $L\to P$ with unitary connection of curvatureExistence requiresfor every closed integral two-cycle $\Sigma$, equivalently integrality of the symplectic cohomology class. Necessity follows from the integral curvature periods of a unitary line bundle; conversely an integral class defines such a bundle, and one adjusts its connection to give the specified curvature. This is a restriction on the classical system, not a choice of local coordinates. For an exact cotangent symplectic form $\omega =-d\theta$, with $\theta =p_{j}d{q}_j$, the bundle can be trivial and a connection is $\nabla =d-i\theta /\hslash$. On a sphere with symplectic area $4\pi s$, the condition becomes $2s/\hslash \in \mathbb{Z}$. The sign of the curvature convention changes if one changes the Hamiltonian-vector-field convention or uses the dual bundle; the integrality condition is unaffected.

The Kostant-Souriau prequantum operator for a real observable isIts derivative part describes the classical Hamiltonian flow and the multiplication term corrects the bracket. Indeed,Since $X_f(g)=-\{f,g\}$, expanding the operator commutator givesWith the Hermitian bundle metric and Liouville measure, these operators are formally symmetric for real $f$ because Hamiltonian flows preserve symplectic volume. On noncompact spaces, domains and self-adjointness still require attention; the algebraic identity initially holds on an appropriate common smooth domain.

Prequantization alone is too large. Sections depend on $2n$ phase-space variables, and the canonical commutation relations are represented reducibly. A polarization is an involutive maximal isotropic distribution $\mathcal{F}\subset T_{\mathbb{C}}P$ of complex rank $n$. Polarized sections satisfyThe curvature vanishes on pairs of polarization vectors because $\omega {|}_{\mathcal{F}}=0$, and involutivity makes the equations locally compatible. A real polarization is tangent to a Lagrangian foliation. A complex polarization in a Kähler manifold chooses one complex tangent type. With the curvature sign used here, choose the holomorphic tangent distribution, giving antiholomorphic wavefunctions. The conjugate line-bundle and sign convention gives the more usual holomorphic description.

For $T^{\ast }Q$, the vertical real polarization is spanned locally by ${\partial }_{p_j}$. Since the canonical one-form has no vertical component, its polarized sections are functions of $q$ alone. In the above trivialization,One does not simply integrate these states over every momentum to retain the prequantum norm: they are constant along noncompact polarization leaves and that integral would diverge. The polarized inner product instead uses the configuration-space measure or an intrinsic half-density description. This recovers the Schrödinger realization.

Only observables whose Hamiltonian flows preserve $\mathcal{F}$ act directly on the polarized space. For example, the free-particle flow generated by $p^2/2$ sends vertical tangent vectors into directions with a configuration-space component, so its raw prequantum operator does not preserve the vertical polarization. To obtain the usual kinetic operator one needs an additional procedure, such as transporting the polarization and pairing back, rather than pretending every classical observable restricts automatically. The Blattner-Kostant-Sternberg pairing and related projection methods address this problem. The impossibility of quantizing all classical observables with every desired algebraic property is another reason to specify the admissible observable algebra.

A metaplectic correction tensors $L$ with a square root of the polarization's canonical determinant bundle when such a square root exists. These half-forms make the pairing more intrinsic and supply corrections to operator transport. They account for familiar Maslov and zero-point shifts; their existence is an extra topological condition. For a flat phase plane, take $z=q+ip$ and replace $\theta =pdq$ by the gauge-equivalent ${\theta }_s=(pdq-qdp)/2$. ThenThe antiholomorphic function therefore has Gaussian norm, the complex-conjugate Bargmann-Fock space. This explicit calculation fixes which polarization matches our curvature sign. Choosing the opposite tangent type with the same sign would give growing Gaussian sections, not the desired Hilbert space. On compact positive Kähler examples, the corresponding holomorphic description (or its conjugate in these conventions) gives finite-dimensional state spaces.

Finding a suitable polarization is therefore a substantial part of the construction. A globally smooth real Lagrangian foliation may fail to exist; for example a regular real polarization on $S^2$ would require a line field that its tangent topology forbids. Singular foliations and noncompact leaves complicate both states and inner products. Although the restricted prequantum connection is locally flat on a Lagrangian leaf, a global nonzero parallel section requires trivial holonomy. In an integrable system this selects the Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization leaves; including the half-form correction gives the familiar action conditionin the usual Maslov-index convention. Complex polarizations require compatible global complex geometry and positivity. Different choices can lead to quite different realizations, and a natural unitary comparison is not automatic. Thus integral curvature provides prequantization; polarization and its global compatibility determine the actual quantum state space.

Set $s=|z{|}^2$. Contraction of the symplectic form with the rotation vector field givesWith the convention fixed in the unheaded solution, ${\iota }_K\omega =-dH$, so the Hamiltonian function isIts derivative is $dH=ds/(1+s{)}^2$. In the chart $w=1/z$, $H=1/(1+|w{|}^2)+C$, so it extends smoothly across infinity; the additive constant is the kernel freedom already identified. Thus $K=X_H$ globally, proving that the action is a Hamiltonian group action. With $C=0$, the moment map for rotation of the complex projective line takes values in $[0,1]$, reaching its endpoints at the two fixed poles.

One can check the normalization in polar coordinates: $\omega =2r(1+r^2{)}^{-2}dr\wedge d\varphi$ has total symplectic area $2\pi$, not $4\pi$, and $H=r^2/(1+r^2)$. Equivalently, in a polar angle with $r=\tan (\vartheta /2)$, $H=(1-\cos \vartheta )/2$. This explains the half-height factor that would be lost by replacing the printed form with the unscaled round-sphere area form. Under the opposite convention ${\iota }_{X_H}\omega =dH$, the Hamiltonian is the negative of this function, up to a constant.

Fix a reference path ${\gamma }_{\ast }$ from $L_0$ to $L_1$. By path connectedness, a path $\gamma$ can be joined to it by a smooth homotopy strip $u:[0,1{]}_s\times [0,1{]}_t\to M$ withSmooth homotopies may be used by the relative smoothing theorem; piecewise smooth homotopies give the same integrals. Orient the square by $ds\wedge dt$ and define the Lagrangian path-area functional byHere $\mathcal{A}$ denotes the functional called $A$ in the question. The minus sign is the convention for which downward gradient flow is $J$-holomorphic on the standard oriented strip.

For relative symplectic-area independence, glue two choices, with one orientation reversed, along their common reference and final paths. The resulting oriented surface is a relative $2$-cycle $Z$ in $(M,L_0\cup L_1)$. Since $H_2(M,L_0\cup L_1)=0$, it bounds a relative $3$-chain: as an absolute chain, $Z=\partial B+C$ for a chain $C$ supported in $L_0\cup L_1$. The symplectic form is closed, and it restricts to zero on each Lagrangian submanifold. Using piecewise smooth relative chains, Stokes theorem givesEquivalently, integration of the closed symplectic form defines the zero pairing on the zero relative homology group. The two strips therefore define the same value of $\mathcal{A}$.

Choosing a different reference path changes every value by the negative area of one fixed connecting strip, independent of $\gamma$. Changing the initially assigned reference value also adds a constant. Path connectedness ensures that this is one global constant, rather than an independent constant on each component.

For the first variation, let $\xi (t)$ be a variation vector field along $\gamma$, with $\xi (0)\in T_{\gamma (0)}{L}_0$ and $\xi (1)\in T_{\gamma (1)}{L}_1$. Differentiate the defining strip integral. Stokes theorem, or the variation formula for the integral of a closed differential form, reduces it to the final edge; the side edges give zero because their variations and tangent vectors lie in the Lagrangian submanifolds. With the chosen sign,If this vanishes for every admissible $\xi$, it in particular vanishes for every field supported in $(0,1)$. Nondegeneracy of the symplectic form, together with the fundamental lemma of the calculus of variations, forces $\dot{\gamma }(t)=0$ in the interior and hence everywhere by smoothness. Conversely, a constant path makes the displayed integral zero. The constant must lie in both endpoint submanifolds. ThusNo transverse-intersection assumption is required; the critical set can be empty or have positive dimension.

A compatible almost complex structure is a smooth bundle map $J:TM\to TM$ such thatThese conditions makea Riemannian metric. Its symmetry follows from the $J$-invariance and skew symmetry of $\omega$, and its positivity is the final compatibility condition. It also satisfies $g(Jv,w)=\omega (v,w)$.

Use the formal $L^2$ metric on the path space,The variation formula becomesThus a formal downward flow $s\mapsto u(s,\cdot )$ satisfiesPut the standard complex structure $j$ on the strip, with $j{\partial }_s={\partial }_t$. The J-holomorphic curve equation $du\circ j=J\circ du$ says $u_t=J{u}_s$, which is equivalent to the displayed flow equation because $J^2=-I$. The converse is identical: a smooth J-holomorphic curve on the strip with the specified Lagrangian boundary conditions gives a formal downward trajectory of $\mathcal{A}$.

As a sign check, along such a strip,The drop in $\mathcal{A}$ therefore equals the positive symplectic area swept out by the strip. The word formal matters: the $L^2$ calculation gives the interior equation and its Lagrangian boundary conditions; it does not assert that arbitrary smooth initial paths produce a well-posed ordinary flow on the smooth path space. In particular, the expression $J\dot{\gamma }$ need not satisfy the endpoint tangent restrictions for an arbitrary initial path. The claimed correspondence concerns smooth solutions of the strip equation.

A symplectomorphism is a diffeomorphism, so it preserves the genus of a surface. It also preserves the orientation determined by the symplectic form and, by integration of a pullback of a differential form, preserves the symplectic area.

Conversely, equal genus of a surface gives a diffeomorphism $f:{\Sigma }_0\to {\Sigma }_1$. We can choose $f$ to preserve the orientations determined by ${\omega }_0,{\omega }_1$: if necessary, compose with an orientation-reversing diffeomorphism of the standard closed orientable surface of that genus of a surface, obtained by reflection of a symmetric handle model. On ${\Sigma }_0$ put $\eta =f^{\ast }{\omega }_1$. Both $\eta$ and ${\omega }_0$ are positive volume forms for the same orientation, and their integrals agree. By top-degree de Rham cohomology, $[\eta ]=[{\omega }_0]$.

The family ${\omega }_t=(1-t){\omega }_0+t\eta$ consists of positive volume forms, hence symplectic forms in dimension two, with constant de Rham cohomology class. Moser theorem supplies $\psi$ with ${\psi }^{\ast }\eta ={\omega }_0$. ConsequentlyTherefore the genus of a surface and symplectic area classify compact connected symplectic surfaces.

Two homotopy strips with the same endpoint paths and boundary on Lagrangian submanifolds glue to a relative $2$-cycle. If that cycle is zero in $H_2(M,L_0\cup L_1)$, its symplectic area vanishes: apply Stokes theorem, using $d\omega =0$ and the zero restriction of $\omega$ to each Lagrangian. Thus relative homology controls the ambiguity in a Lagrangian path-area functional.

Normalize the Fubini-Study form so that a complex projective line has symplectic area $\pi$. The displayed map takes the unit symplectic ball in ${\mathbb{C}}^n$ diffeomorphically onto the complement of the last-coordinate hyperplane. Its lift to the unit sphere has last coordinate positive real, so that coordinate contributes zero to the pulled-back standard symplectic form. The map is therefore a symplectomorphism.