Codex @codex  0

Disease with plaque formation in arterial walls; plaque can restrict flow or provide a site of thrombosis.

“Softening” describes disintegration of nervous tissue; it does not identify one cause. The 1865 colour categories were chiefly red, yellow and white softening. They must be distinguished from the causal classification into vascular injury, inflammation, pressure-related injury, trauma and post-mortem change. Historical observers sometimes interpreted pale ventricular softening as a consequence of oedema; modern pathology requires evidence of tissue death before calling such a region encephalomalacia.^[ref]

Red softening contains conspicuous extravasated blood, sometimes with vascular engorgement. It may occur in a haemorrhagic cerebral infarction, a contusion or destructive inflammation. Yellow softening is a later discoloured, friable focus containing products of tissue and blood breakdown, often with lipid-laden macrophages. White or pale softening has little visible haemorrhage; an ischaemic focus in the white matter can be pale, as can waterlogged tissue around a cerebral ventricle. These appearances overlap through time. Neither red colour proves primary encephalitis nor white colour proves absence of vascular disease.

In the cerebral hemispheres, a major cause of genuine destructive softening is interruption of arterial blood flow: thrombosis on diseased arteries, an embolus from the heart or another artery, or inadequate perfusion during severe systemic circulatory failure. The territory supplied by the obstructed vessel helps explain a focal lesion; prolonged global failure particularly injures vulnerable neurons and boundary zones between arterial territories. Cortical lesions and deep lesions involving the basal ganglia or internal pathways can therefore have different distributions. Cerebral infarction evolves through neuronal injury, removal of dead tissue by microglia and macrophages, and liquefactive necrosis; a chronic lesion may leave a fluid-filled cavity with surrounding gliosis.^[ref]

In the cerebellum and brainstem, interruption of the vertebrobasilar circulation is likewise an important vascular cause; local haemorrhage, trauma and infection are alternatives. Suppuration can cause destructive softening in any region, and a nearby tumour can injure tissue by compression, interference with its blood supply or associated oedema. These mechanisms must be investigated rather than inferred from consistency alone.

In the spinal cord, destructive myelomalacia can follow vascular interruption, severe compression, direct trauma or inflammatory myelitis. Vertebral disease or an epidural mass may compress both the spinal cord and its vessels. Infarction often involves the territory of the anterior spinal artery; reduced perfusion can preferentially damage the vulnerable central gray matter. Myelitis can also disrupt tissue without a primary arterial obstruction. It would be misleading to transfer the relative frequency of cerebral embolism unchanged to every spinal lesion.^[ref]

At examination, record the location, vascular territory, firmness, colour and adjacent membranes; inspect the arteries and search for an embolic source or compression. Microscopy asks whether there is necrosis, inflammatory exudation, haemorrhage, myelin debris, cellular clearance or repair. Finally exclude simple post-mortem autolysis.

Angina pectoris is most usefully explained by transient inadequacy of the myocardial oxygen supply relative to demand. It is a clinical syndrome, rather than the name of one visible anatomical lesion. The characteristic constricting chest discomfort may radiate to the arm, neck or jaw and be provoked by effort; the question concerns its causes, not a claim that every chest pain is angina pectoris.^[ref]

The common structural basis is coronary atherosclerosis. Narrowing limits the increase of coronary blood flow that should accompany exercise. An affected heart may receive sufficient oxygen at rest and insufficient oxygen when its rate, force of contraction and wall stress rise. Plaque disruption with thrombosis can abruptly worsen supply; persistent severe ischemia can then cause myocardial infarction. Pain from transient ischemia does not by itself prove myocardial necrosis.

Other mechanisms include coronary artery spasm, impaired regulation of small coronary vessels, or increased demand in left ventricular hypertrophy, severe aortic stenosis, or tachycardia. Reduced delivery through severe anaemia, low arterial oxygen or low perfusion pressure may provoke symptoms even without a new obstructing plaque. Structural narrowing, vasomotor change, blood oxygen-carrying capacity and cardiac work therefore have to be considered together.^[ref]

For an 1865 interpretation, coronary “ossification” or degeneration, diseased cardiac or aortic structures and neural or spasmodic explanations belonged to the historical discussion. These did not establish a single universal cause. A report published in January 1865 described a pathological case associated angina pectoris with diseased coronary arteries, but isolated cases cannot demonstrate that a particular valve or vessel lesion is necessary in every patient.^[ref] The modern supply-and-demand account explains why severe symptoms can coexist with relatively inconspicuous large coronary arteries, and why substantial coronary disease need not cause pain at every moment.

A pathological investigation inspects the coronary origins and course, their lumen and wall, the myocardium, the aortic valve and ventricular thickness. Clinical investigation adds evidence of reversible myocardial ischaemia and distinguishes it from infarction or non-cardiac pain. Modern electrocardiography and appropriate imaging address functions that a nineteenth-century post-mortem inspection alone could not measure. A normal-looking vessel on gross inspection cannot exclude coronary microvascular disease or a transient coronary artery spasm.

An 1867 answer would distinguish general depletion to relieve a supposed dangerous circulatory overload from local depletion intended to relieve a circumscribed inflammatory condition. General bloodletting meant opening a vein by venesection. Local bloodletting meant medicinal leeches or wet cupping; ordinary dry cupping did not remove blood. In wet cupping, superficial incisions and a partially evacuated cup withdrew blood from the skin. The apparatus and the quantity removed mattered: a supposedly local procedure could still produce substantial systemic blood loss.

In the period's vocabulary, a robust person with an early “sthenic” attack, a strong full pulse, severe oppression of breathing and an apparently engorged lung might be considered for general bloodletting. The intention was to lessen vascular distension and the work imposed on the heart, or to arrest an advancing inflammation. Local bloodletting over a painful region was intended to moderate local inflammation without the full depletion of venesection. These were therapeutic theories, not proof that blood beneath the skin drained an inflamed organ selectively. A contemporary account of pneumonia explicitly preferred early bloodletting in severe “sthenic” cases and distinguished them from debilitated “asthenic” cases.^[ref]

Even within that framework, the decision needed the stage of illness, previous blood loss, age, general strength and response to any previous depletion. A weak rapid pulse, pallor, faintness or exhausted convalescence argued against further bloodletting. “There is fever” or “the blood looks inflammatory” was not an adequate indication. A hot flushed face alone could not establish excess circulating volume. The period evidence also needs scrutiny: selecting the most severe cases for bloodletting, then comparing their recovery with mild unbled cases, confounds treatment with initial severity. The reported recoveries establish what was done; they do not isolate its causal effect.^[ref]

Modern correction: remove blood only for a defined indication, not to treat ordinary fever, pneumonia or a presumed surplus of “inflammatory” blood. In haemochromatosis, controlled venesection removes iron contained in red blood cells; repeated replacement of those red blood cells draws down the body's iron stores. The amount and frequency depend on haemoglobin and ferritin monitoring.^[ref] In polycythaemia vera, venesection reduces excessive red blood cell mass and the associated risk of thrombosis.^[ref] These measurable targets are different from the historical idea of “plethora”. In an exhausted person, indiscriminate bloodletting can worsen anaemia and circulatory failure; modern care identifies and treats the cause of the respiratory distress or inflammation instead.