The electric-dipole approximation for radiation requires the source size to be much smaller than the radiation wavelength:
The displayed fields also describe the radiation zone, so the observation point must satisfy and .
Write . The given vector potential and the time derivative of the electric dipole moment give
When taking the curl, differentiating produces a near-field term of order , while differentiating the retarded time produces the leading radiation term because . Hence
The assumed electric field and the transversality make the Poynting vector
On a sphere of radius , the power through surface element is therefore
Choose the polar axis along and use the angular distribution of electric dipole radiation, for which . Since ,
For the charged particle in simple harmonic motion,
Thus
Here the angular frequency obeys , and the average uses . The dipole condition is
Allow the amplitude to vary slowly as radiation removes energy. The mechanical energy is
so the radiation damping of a harmonically oscillating charge gives
This is exponential decay with rate . Its half-life is
Finally, the largest particle speed is . Therefore the dipole condition itself implies , precisely the nonrelativistic limit required by the mechanical energy formula.
The chemical potential is the change in internal energy when one particle is added at fixed entropy and volume:
Equivalently, for the Helmholtz free energy.
Let a microstate have energy and particle number . Maximizing the Gibbs entropy subject to normalization and fixed mean values of and is the maximum-entropy derivation of equilibrium ensembles. With Lagrange multipliers , , and , vary
The stationarity equation is . Normalization therefore gives the grand canonical ensemble
Here is the grand canonical partition function and is the Boltzmann constant.
For one fermionic quantum state of energy , the Pauli exclusion principle permits occupation numbers only . Its two grand-canonical weights are and , so its mean occupation is the Fermi-Dirac distribution
For a free nonrelativistic particle, . In a region of area , the number of wave-vector states in the annulus from to , including the two spin angular momentum states, is
Since , the two-dimensional free-electron density of states is constant:
We now use units in which , as in the question. At zero temperature, the Fermi-Dirac distribution is a step function, and hence
At positive temperature the same fixed particle number satisfies the exact relation
Thus
This is the low-temperature particle-number cancellation for constant density of states. Therefore, for , the mean number of particles in the energy interval is
Finally, compare the internal energy with its zero-temperature value. The thermally excited particles above and holes below have equal leading particle numbers, so their terms proportional to cancel. With ,
where the integral follows from the fermion-to-boson thermal integral ratio. Differentiation gives the linear low-temperature heat capacity of a two-dimensional Fermi gas:
The requested power law is therefore linear in , with exponent one.
Bloch theorem states that the energy eigenstates of a Hamiltonian invariant under translations by a Bravais lattice can be chosen as Bloch states
Indeed, the unitary operators commute with one another because , and they commute with by hypothesis. The simultaneous diagonalization theorem therefore lets us diagonalize all translations within each energy eigenspace. Their eigenvalues form a unitary character of the additive lattice:
Writing on a primitive basis gives . In position space, with , this implies . Hence is lattice-periodic. Adding a reciprocal lattice vector to leaves the character unchanged, so the crystal momentum lies in a Brillouin zone.
For
the equations give the reciprocal basis
The reciprocal lattice is triangular, so the first Brillouin zone is its Wigner-Seitz cell, a regular hexagon. Its six corners are
Reciprocal-lattice translations identify these corners in two classes of three. Representatives are
For example, , while the other equivalences follow by symmetry and reciprocal translations. This gives the requested sketch: a regular hexagon with the vertical edge from to at and alternating corner classes.
For the tight-binding model, introduce the normalized Bloch sum
Each hop by multiplies this state by . Thus the two-direction nearest-neighbour tight-binding dispersion is
Along the boundary edge from to , and , so
For , it rises from at either corner to at the midpoint; for the ordering reverses. Globally the two cosines in the first expression can simultaneously equal or , and therefore
Each orbital band contains two one-electron states per lattice site because an electron has two spin states. By band filling, a valency of one leaves this band half-filled and the material conducts, whereas a valency of two fills it. A filled band can be insulating only if it is separated from every empty band by a positive band gap.
The first band's maximum is . If the second band's minimum is , a gap exists precisely when . Consequently, among the nontrivial fillings described here,
For valency one the first band is partially filled. If , the bands overlap or touch, so even at valency two the overlapping energy bands prevent a band insulator.

Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project

Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
We have two killer features:
  1. topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculus
    Articles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
    • a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
    • a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
    This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.
    Figure 1.
    Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page
    . View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivative
  2. local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:
    This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
    Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally.
    Video 3.
    Edit locally and publish demo
    . Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension.
  3. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook-media/master/feature/x/hilbert-space-arrow.png
  4. Infinitely deep tables of contents:
    Figure 6.
    Dynamic article tree with infinitely deep table of contents
    .
    Descendant pages can also show up as toplevel e.g.: ourbigbook.com/cirosantilli/chordate-subclade
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact