A clopen set is a subset that is both open and closed.

The Ghirardi--Rimini--Weber theory modifies unitary time evolution by random Gaussian position localizations. Each constituent collapses at a small fixed rate, while the rate for an entangled macroscopic body grows with its number of constituents.

A pseudomodulus is a classically flat scalar direction in a supersymmetry-breaking vacuum. Quantum corrections usually generate an effective potential along it without restoring simultaneous F-flatness.

In a one-period market, a numéraire portfolio has strictly positive value at both dates and can therefore be used to convert initial consumption into terminal wealth.

The averaged null energy condition requiresalong every complete affinely parametrized null geodesic. It is weaker than the pointwise null energy condition.

An oblique shock is inclined relative to the upstream velocity. In an inviscid perfect gas, the normal velocity satisfies the normal-shock jump conditions while the tangential velocity is continuous.

The prime omega function has normal order $\log \log n$. The elementary second-moment estimatealready proves concentration on every scale larger than $\sqrt{\log \log x}$.

For a bounded operator $A:X\to Y$ between Hilbert spaces, the Moore–Penrose inverse maps admissible data to the unique minimum-norm least-squares solution. If $({\sigma }_j,u_j,v_j)$ is a singular system of a compact operator, thenon the data for which this series converges.

More precisely, its domain is $\mathrm{ran}A\oplus (\mathrm{ran}A{)}^{\perp }$. It vanishes on $(\mathrm{ran}A{)}^{\perp }$ and takes values in $(\ker A{)}^{\perp }$. An infinite-rank compact operator on infinite-dimensional spaces has singular values approaching zero, so its inverse on its range is generally unbounded; Picard criterion specifies admissible data.

The $O(N)$ nonlinear sigma model has an $N$-component field constrained to a sphere, commonly ${\mathbf{n}}^2=N$ or $1$. An auxiliary Lagrange-multiplier field turns the constraint into a self-consistent mass gap in the Large-N expansion.

The trapped focusing cubic ground-state equation in two dimensions isA nonzero positive solution follows from minimizing the harmonic-oscillator quadratic form subject to a fixed $L^4$ norm and then rescaling by the positive Lagrange multiplier.

Every bounded sequence $(u_n)$ in $H^1({\mathbb{R}}^d)$ has, after passage to a subsequence, a decompositionwhere $|x_n^j-x_n^k|\to \infty$ for $j\ne k$, the $L^2$ and gradient norms decouple asymptotically, andfor every $2<p<2^{\ast }$.

A virial identity describes the time derivatives of a spatial moment of a solution to a dispersive equation. For the mass-critical nonlinear Schrödinger equation, the second derivative of the variance is a constant multiple of the conserved energy.

The mass-critical focusing nonlinear Schrödinger equation on ${\mathbb{R}}^d$ isIts scaling $u(t,x)\mapsto {\lambda }^{d/2}u({\lambda }^{2}t,\lambda x)$ preserves the Lebesgue space norm $\Vert u{\Vert }_{L^2}$, which is the conserved mass.

An ideal $I$ of a Noetherian local ring $(A,\mathfrak{m})$ is an ideal of definition when $A/I$ has Krull dimension zero. Equivalently, $I$ is $\mathfrak{m}$-primary, so $\sqrt{I}=\mathfrak{m}$ and ${\mathfrak{m}}^r\subseteq I$ for some positive integer $r$.

The dilatation current associated with scale transformations is $D^{\mu }=x_{\nu }{T}^{\mu \nu }$ up to improvement terms. Its divergence is the trace of the stress-energy tensor, so classical scale invariance requires a traceless improved tensor on shell.

A Noether charge is the spatial integral $Q=\int j^0{d}^{3}x$ of a Noether current. It is time-independent when the current has vanishing flux through the spatial boundary, and in a Hamiltonian formulation it generates the associated continuous symmetry.

A conserved current is a vector field $j^{\mu }$ satisfying the continuity equation ${\partial }_{\mu }{j}^{\mu }=0$. Its spatial integral is constant in time when no current crosses the boundary.

A quantum instrument associates each classical outcome with a completely positive trace-nonincreasing map; summing the outcome maps gives a quantum channel. It specifies both outcome probabilities and conditional output states.

The Cavendish experiment makes the attraction predicted by Newton's law of universal gravitation measurable between laboratory masses. Two small test masses hang at the ends of a horizontal rod in a Cavendish torsion balance; nearby larger source masses exert a tiny torque. A thin suspension fiber supplies an opposing torque as it twists. Measuring its twist and calibrating its torsion constant lets an experimenter infer the gravitational force and, in a modern analysis, the gravitational constant. ^[ref]

The beautiful feature is that the two horizontal forces can cancel as vectors while their torques add. The instrument converts weak attraction into a rotation, with sensitivity set by the fiber's torsion constant. Earth's much larger downward gravitational weight is supported by the suspension rather than supplying the intended torque about its vertical axis. A laboratory measurement can therefore probe the same Newtonian gravitational field that governs the two-body problem.

Henry Cavendish's original paper was Experiments to determine the Density of the Earth, published in Philosophical Transactions, volume 88 (1798), pp. 469–526, and read on 21 June 1798. On p. 469 he credits John Michell with the apparatus idea and explains that Michell died before using it; the instrument reached Cavendish through Francis John Hyde Wollaston. Cavendish's stated aim was Earth's mean mass density. Calling the experiment a determination of the gravitational constant is a modern interpretation, not Cavendish's own formulation of his result. ^[ref]

The connection between Earth's mean mass density and the gravitational constant follows in a spherical, nonrotating model of Earth. With Earth mass $M_E$, radius $R_E$, and surface gravitational acceleration $g$, the spherical shell theorem and Newton's law of universal gravitation giveThus a local comparison of gravitational attractions, together with knowledge of Earth's size and surface gravitational acceleration, reaches a property of the entire planet. These are modern equations explaining the connection, not equations quoted from Cavendish's paper.

For a worked example, use an explicitly simplified two-near-pair model. Each test point mass is $m$, each source point mass is $M$, and each lever arm is $L$, so the rod's full length is $2L$. Neglect the rod's mass. At zero twist put the test masses at $(-L,0)$ and $(L,0)$, and the sources at $(-L,-r)$ and $(L,r)$. Here $r$ is the near-pair center separation. Ignore each source's attraction on the test mass at the opposite end. Evaluate the two near-pair forces at zero twist and treat their torque as constant for a small twist, requiring $L|\theta |\ll r$. This is a teaching model, not a precision model of Cavendish's actual apparatus.

By Newton's law of universal gravitation, each retained force has magnitude $F=GmM/r^2$. The left force points down and the right force points up. Using torque about the suspension axis, both contributions are counterclockwise when viewed from above:The net retained horizontal force is zero, yet the net torque is positive. Moving the sources to $(-L,r)$ and $(L,-r)$ reverses both forces and hence the torque. In a real apparatus, the opposite source also attracts each test mass; that correction is explicitly included in the university derivation. ^[ref]

For illustrative parameters, take $m=0.010\mathrm{kg}$, $M=1.0\mathrm{kg}$, $r=0.050\mathrm{m}$, $L=0.10\mathrm{m}$, and torsion constant $\kappa =1.0\times 10^{-8}\mathrm{N}m/rad$. Use $G=6.67430\times 10^{-11}{\mathrm{m}}^3\mathrm{k}{\mathrm{g}}^{-1}{\mathrm{s}}^{-2}$, the central value in NIST's 2022 CODATA table; that table gives standard uncertainty $0.00015\times 10^{-11}{\mathrm{m}}^3\mathrm{k}{\mathrm{g}}^{-1}{\mathrm{s}}^{-2}$. This is an input for the example, not a measurement made with these assumed parameters. ^[ref]This sub-nanonewton force produces a measurable twist in the Cavendish torsion balance. The displayed digits make the toy calculation reproducible; they do not describe experimental precision.

The gravitational constant $G$ sets the strength of Newton's law of universal gravitation. Two point masses $M$ and $m$ a center-to-center distance $r$ apart attract with force magnitudeFor fixed masses and separation, doubling $G$ would double the force. For bodies with spherical symmetry, the same exterior formula follows from the spherical shell theorem; for arbitrary extended bodies, add the attractions of their mass density elements instead. The gravitational constant connects a laboratory attraction to the Newtonian gravitational field controlling a Kepler orbit.

The gravitational constant $G$ and local gravitational acceleration $g$ are different quantities. Applying Newton's second law to a test particle gives $g=F/m=GM/r^2$ for one spherical source. The source's mass and the observer's position change $g$; $G$ remains the same parameter of the law. A local falling-body experiment therefore measures a field, not $G$ alone. On rotating Earth, an instrument fixed to the surface also responds to centrifugal acceleration, while surrounding mass density and altitude change the gravitational contribution.

Dimensional analysis explains the units. Denote the base physical dimensions of length, mass and time by $\mathsf{L},\mathsf{M},\mathsf{T}$. Since force has dimension $\mathsf{ML}{\mathsf{T}}^{-2}$,By contrast, $[g]=\mathsf{L}{\mathsf{T}}^{-2}$ and the standard gravitational parameter $\mu =GM$ has dimension ${\mathsf{L}}^3{\mathsf{T}}^{-2}$. A small numerical value of a dimensional constant depends on the units chosen: it is the resulting force for specified physical masses and separation that conveys the laboratory scale.

NIST's current complete listing givesfor the 2022 CODATA adjustment, the latest adjustment listed when checked on 14 October 2026. Parentheses indicate a standard uncertainty $u(G)=0.00015\times 10^{-11}{\mathrm{m}}^3\mathrm{k}{\mathrm{g}}^{-1}{\mathrm{s}}^{-2}$, approximately $22$ parts per million relative to $G$. The adjustment year is 2022; NIST's May 2024 data update is a different date.^{[ref] [ref]}

For an original scale calculation, stipulate two $1\mathrm{kg}$ point masses separated by $1\mathrm{m}$ and insert this recommended $G$: $F=6.67430\times 10^{-11}\mathrm{N}$. The corresponding acceleration of either mass is $6.67430\times 10^{-11}\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-2}$ at that instant. Reducing the separation to $0.10\mathrm{m}$ multiplies both by $100$. These are ideal model predictions, not observations; their tiny scale explains why stray forces matter.

Being a constant of a physical law does not make the numerical value exact. The SI fixes the numerical values of seven defining constants, including the speed of light and Planck constant; $G$ is determined experimentally. Exact unit definitions still require physical realizations with measurement uncertainty: calibrating a length or a mass does not become error-free.^[ref]