Let $I_{\perp }$ denote the moment of inertia normal to the disc and $I_d$ that about any central diameter. Rotational symmetry makes the two perpendicular diameter values equal. By the perpendicular axis theorem, $I_{\perp }=2I_d$. The intended angular impulse has magnitude $J=I_{\perp }{\omega }_0$; delivering that magnitude about a diameter instead gives $J=I_d\omega$. ThusThese are principal axes, so angular momentum is parallel to angular velocity in both cases. Equal delivered angular impulse means equal magnitude of the change in angular momentum, not equal rotational kinetic energy; the actual rotational kinetic energy is twice the intended value.

Choose three mutually perpendicular axes through the same point, and label coordinates $x,y,z$. The moments of inertia of any rigid body areSubtracting givesFor a thin planar lamina lying in $z=0$, the right-hand side vanishes, proving the perpendicular axis theorem:The two in-plane axes and the perpendicular axis must intersect at one point; this need not be the centre of mass. For an extended three-dimensional mass distribution, the equality generally fails. The general moment-of-inertia triangle inequalities arewith equality in the first precisely when all mass lies in the plane perpendicular to its $z$ axis, and cyclically for the others. None of these identities requires principal axes.

To calculate magnetic-field cancellation of an arc and tangent leads away from the plane, put $a^2=R^2+h^2$. Each point on the arc is distance $a$ from $(0,0,h)$, and the axial component of $d\mathbf{l}\times \mathbf{s}$ still has magnitude $R^{2}d\varphi$. Thus its axial magnetic field isFor either tangent lead the axial numerator remains $Rds$, while the cubed distance is $(R^2+h^2+s^2{)}^{3/2}$. HenceAdding both leads givesFor $ϵ=h/R\ll 1$, a binomial series yieldsThe exact condition for cancellation of the axial component isFor example, keeping $\theta =2$ would leave a small positive axial magnetic field proportional to $h^2/R^2$. Both contributions weaken with height, but the arc factor is $(1+{ϵ}^2{)}^{-3/2}$ whereas the lead factor is $(1+{ϵ}^2{)}^{-1}$. The arc therefore loses a greater fraction of its axial magnetic field. Increasing its angle compensates for this loss. Physically, the arc is all at the same finite radius, whereas distant elements of the semi-infinite leads undergo a smaller fractional change in distance on moving a little out of the plane.

The cancellation here concerns $B_z$ only; off the plane it does not assert that every component of the magnetic field vanishes. The small-height result also stays within the tangent-lead geometry shown in the original paper.

Read the original diagram as a clockwise arc carrying electric current from its upper endpoint to its lower endpoint, with tangent semi-infinite leads extending to the right. Their crossing is insulated, so there is no extra junction. Choose $+z$ out of the page. At the centre the arc produces a negative axial magnetic field, and each straight lead a positive one, by the right-hand rule.

For the arc, every element is at distance $R$, with $d\mathbf{l}$ perpendicular to its displacement to the centre. The Biot-Savart law therefore givesFor each straight lead, write $s\ge 0$ for distance along the tangent measured from its endpoint. Its perpendicular distance from the centre is $R$, soThe integral equals $1/R$ because an antiderivative is $s/[R\sqrt{R^2+s^2}]$. Adding both leads and the arc,Using the full infinite-wire magnetic field for either lead would incorrectly double its contribution.

Choose the electric current counterclockwise as viewed from $+z$; reversing it reverses the magnetic field. Parameterize the circular wire byThe cross product in the Biot-Savart law isConsequently the transverse terms integrate to zero over $0\le \varphi \le 2\pi$, while the axial term is constant:ThusThe direction is $+z$ on both halves of the axis for this electric current orientation, including $z<0$; it is not “away from the plane” on both sides. The right-hand rule gives the same direction.

For an infinite straight wire in vacuum, Ampère's circuital law around a circle of radius $R$ gives $B(2\pi R)={\mu }_{0}I$. ThereforeHere ${\mu }_0$ is the vacuum permeability and the azimuthal direction follows the right-hand rule around the electric current. The magnetic field is measured in $\mathrm{T}$.

For $u=8\mathrm{cm}$ and negative focal length $f=-8\mathrm{cm}$,The transverse magnification is $M=-v/u=+1/2$, soThus the virtual image is upright, half the object's height, and $4.0\mathrm{cm}$ from the lens on the object's side. A parallel incident light ray diverges after the lens as though it originated at the near optical focus; the central light ray continues undeviated in the ideal thin lens model. Their backward extensions meet at the image tip, $(-4,1)\mathrm{cm}$.

Use positive object distance $u=20\mathrm{cm}$ and focal length $f=4\mathrm{cm}$. The thin lens equation givesThe transverse magnification is $M=-v/u=-1/4$, so the signed height isThe real image lies $5.0\mathrm{cm}$ beyond the lens, is inverted, and has positive height magnitude $0.50\mathrm{cm}$.

Keep the paper's $R_1,R_2>0$ as magnitudes for the two convex faces. With the standard signed-curvature convention measured to the right, the first surface has signed radius $+R_1$ and the second $-R_2$. This explains why the requested formula contains a sum of the two reciprocal magnitudes.

Let the axial lens thickness be $\ell$, and let $d_1$ be the distance from the first vertex to the intermediate focus that its refracted rays would reach without the second surface. The first refraction at a spherical surface givesAt the second face those rays are still converging toward that intermediate focus, so its object distance is negative, $u_2=-d_2$, with $d_2=d_1-\ell$. Applying the signed spherical-surface equation again givesIn the thin lens limit, $d_2\simeq d_1$. Adding cancels the intermediate-focus terms:The focal length is the image distance for parallel incident light rays, $u\to \infty$, hence the lensmaker's equation isThe same surrounding refractive index $n_1$ is assumed on both sides. For $n_2>n_1$ this biconvex thin lens has positive focal length. With signed radii $R_a=R_1$, $R_b=-R_2$, the equivalent familiar expression is $1/f=(n_2/n_1-1)(1/R_a-1/R_b)$.

Use the original diagram's positive distances: $u$ from the object to the vertex, $d$ from the vertex to the image, and $R$ from the vertex toward the centre of curvature on the outgoing side. Let a paraxial light ray strike at height $Y$. Its incoming inclination is $\alpha \simeq Y/u$ above the optical axis, its outgoing inclination is $\beta \simeq Y/d$ below it, and the inward surface normal is inclined by $\theta \simeq Y/R$ below it. Thus the incidence and refraction angles relative to that normal are respectively $\alpha +\theta$ and $\theta -\beta$.

The local tangent-plane form of Snell's law, using the small-angle approximation, givesSubstitute the three height-to-distance ratios and cancel $Y$:This refraction at a spherical surface result keeps only first-order ray angles. The surface sag shifts the height's axial reference only at higher order. Distances for other object, image or curvature orientations must be signed consistently; the displayed positive-distance form follows the particular orientation in the paper.

For overdamping, $\gamma =b/(2m)>\omega$. Put $\alpha =\sqrt{{\gamma }^2-{\omega }^2}>0$. Both characteristic roots $-\gamma \pm \alpha$ are negative real numbers. Replacing trigonometric functions by hyperbolic functions gives the exact trajectoryIt starts from $(c,c)$ with tangent $(-\omega c,\omega c)$, bends anticlockwise toward the origin, and approaches it without repeated revolutions. The right panel gives a representative choice $\gamma =1.5\omega$; the paper does not specify one particular value of $b$ in this regime.

One can make the qualitative shape precise. In radial and tangential directions relative to the initial radius, the angle turned from the starting direction obeysFor $c>0$, both coordinates stay positive, and the approach is along the fixed ray with $y/x\to (\gamma +\alpha +\omega )/(\gamma +\alpha -\omega )$. The initial velocity is tangential, so an immediately straight radial return would be incorrect. The absence of oscillatory characteristic roots prevents repeated revolutions. This is a non-spiralling overdamped central oscillator trajectory.

The parameters giveThe coordinate expressions for the initially circular damped planar oscillator areThe damped oscillation period $2\pi /\nu =1.00052\mathrm{s}$ gives almost four anticlockwise turns in four seconds. The radius envelope falls by $e^{-\gamma (4\mathrm{s})}=e^{-1}=0.3679$. Substitution into the exact coordinates givesThe left panel annotates the initial tangent, time marks and endpoint. Because $c$ is an unspecified starting coordinate, the axes are normalized by $c$ rather than assigned numerical lengths.

Write $\gamma =b/(2m)$ and $\nu =\sqrt{{\omega }^2-{\gamma }^2}$, where $\omega =\sqrt{k/m}$ is the undamped angular frequency. The linear drag gives the vector damped harmonic oscillator equationFor the original circular initial conditions, ${\mathbf{r}}_0=(c,c)$ and ${\mathbf{v}}_0=\omega (-c,c)$, the exact underdamped solution isUsing $|{\mathbf{r}}_0{|}^2=2c^2$, $|{\mathbf{v}}_0{|}^2=2{\omega }^2{c}^2$ and ${\mathbf{r}}_0\cdot {\mathbf{v}}_0=0$ givesThis exact potential energy is useful because it satisfies the prescribed initial conditions, including $\dot{U}(0)=k{\mathbf{r}}_0\cdot {\mathbf{v}}_0=0$. In the stated weak-damping limit $\gamma \ll \omega$, $\nu \simeq \omega$ and the square bracket differs from one by a small oscillatory term. The leading approximation is thereforeThe radius is approximately $\sqrt{2}c{e}^{-bt/(2m)}$, so the trajectory is approximately a shrinking logarithmic spiral. The exactly exponential result would require slightly adjusted initial velocity; with the specified undamped circular velocity, the small modulation above is real. This is the initially circular damped planar oscillator.

The starting radius is $r_0=\sqrt{2}c$. In uniform circular motion, the required centripetal acceleration has magnitude ${\omega }^2{r}_0=k{r}_0/m$. The initial velocity must be tangent to the starting radius, with the orientation chosen anticlockwise:The resulting trajectory isIt has constant $x^2+y^2=2c^2$, soThis is the horizontal line in the right panel of the figure. The kinetic energy also equals $k{c}^2$, giving total mechanical energy $2k{c}^2$, twice that for release from rest at the same point.

The force is conservative, with $\mathbf{F}=-\nabla U$ and potential energy zero at the origin:Released from rest at $(c,c)$, the trajectory has $x=y=c\cos \omega t$, givingThe right panel of the figure shows this nonnegative oscillation: it starts at a maximum $k{c}^2$, reaches zero at $t=\pi /(2\omega )$, and repeats after $\pi /\omega$. Its frequency is twice the coordinate frequency. Conservation of mechanical energy gives $K(t)=k{c}^2{\sin }^2\omega t$, so the missing potential energy is kinetic energy, not an energy loss.

Put $\delta ={\varphi }_2-{\varphi }_1$. If both coordinate amplitudes are nonzero, eliminate the common phase to obtainFor $\sin \delta \ne 0$, this is an ellipse centred at the origin. The following special cases exhaust the possible nontrivial shapes:

The degenerate zero-amplitude solution is the stationary origin. There are no general multi-loop patterns here because the two angular frequencies are equal. Another useful description is $\mathbf{r}=\mathbf{a}\cos \omega t+\mathbf{b}\sin \omega t$, the image of a circle under a linear map.

The force law separates into two identical harmonic oscillator equations:For positive $m,k$, the general real solution isSince $\mathrm{Re}(e^{i\alpha })=\cos \alpha$ by Euler's formula, these are exactly the stated real parts of complex exponentials. The amplitudes $x_0,y_0$ and phases ${\varphi }_1,{\varphi }_2$ are fixed by the four initial position and velocity components. This is two-dimensional isotropic harmonic oscillator flow: the same angular frequency acts in every direction.

For injected velocity $\mathbf{v}=v\hat{\mathbf{x}}$, the Lorentz force isFor nonzero electric charge and nonzero operating current, the velocity selector condition isThe requested nonrelativistic kinetic energy is consequentlyBoth electric current and electric charge cancel. Reversing the sign of $q$ reverses both component forces and preserves their cancellation. The dimensions are consistent because $R/{\mu }_0$ has units of speed, while $w/d$ is dimensionless. The assumed nonrelativistic particle regime requires $Rw/({\mu }_{0}d)\ll c$; the problem supplies no values with which to evaluate a numerical energy.

Keep $+x$ along the upper-sheet current and $+z$ upward, putting the lower sheet at $z=0$ and upper sheet at $z=d$. Between them, the upper sheet's lower-side magnetic field is $+{\mu }_{0}I/(2w)\hat{\mathbf{y}}$. The lower sheet carries current in $-x$, so its upper-side magnetic field is also $+{\mu }_{0}I/(2w)\hat{\mathbf{y}}$. The superposition principle therefore givesEach perfect conductor is an equipotential. The circuit's resistor carries current from upper to lower, so Ohm's law fixes their electric potential difference:The broad parallel faces and their constant potentials make the electric field perpendicular to them and independent of the coordinates along them, away from edges. There is no volume electric charge in the gap. Apply Gauss's law to a small pillbox wholly within the gap, with equal face areas $A$ at heights $z_1,z_2$. Its side flux is zero, soThus $E_z$ is independent of height as well. Since $V_{\mathrm{upper}}-V_{\mathrm{lower}}=-{\int }_0^d{E}_{z}dz$,It points from the higher-potential upper sheet to the lower sheet. Gauss's law requires the planar symmetry argument: zero enclosed charge alone would not prove a uniform electric field in a general geometry. These combined fields characterize parallel current sheets with a resistive termination.

Choose $+x$ along the electric current, $+z$ upward normal to the sheet, and $+y$ to complete a right-handed frame. In the interior region far from its edges, treat the sheet as infinite in its plane. Its surface current density isReflection and translational symmetry make the magnetic field parallel to the sheet, perpendicular to its current, and equal in magnitude with opposite direction above and below. Choose an Ampère's circuital law rectangle with length $s$ along $y$, straddling the full thickness. The two long sides each contribute $Bs$ with the same sign; on the vertical sides $\mathbf{B}\cdot d\mathbf{l}=0$ since $\mathbf{B}$ is horizontal. The enclosed electric current is $Ks=Is/w$. ThusThe right-hand rule fixes the directions:The current density inside the finite-thickness conductor is $\mathbf{J}=I/(wt)\hat{\mathbf{x}}$, so integrating through thickness $t$ gives the same $\mathbf{K}$. These are exterior fields in the broad-sheet approximation, not exact finite-width edge fields.