For the Paczyński-Wiita potential, circular balance gives
Therefore
The squared radial epicyclic frequency is
Circular orbits change from stable to unstable where vanishes, so
For , its -periodization is one almost everywhere. The refinement mask is the periodic function equal to one on and zero on the rest of . Fourier inversion gives the Shannon scaling function
Since , its Fourier coefficients give
Fourier transforming the refinement equation and changing variables gives
By Parseval identity, orthonormality of the translates is equivalent to
These are precisely the Fourier coefficients of the periodization . Therefore
An orthonormal wavelet is such that is an orthonormal basis. A multiresolution analysis is a nested family of closed spaces with trivial intersection, dense union, dyadic scaling, integer-translation invariance of , and a generator whose integer translates form an orthonormal basis of . The Meyer-Mallat theorem says every such analysis has an orthonormal wavelet whose translates span .
The Schoenberg spline operator is positive and . If , then both and lie in , so
Because averages products of knots in the same interval and all points lie in ,
The Korovkin theorem now proves
for every .
Let denote the th elementary symmetric polynomial of . Expanding both sides of the Marsden identity in powers of and equating the coefficient of gives
Thus , while and are respectively the means of the interior knots and of their pairwise products.
The Korovkin theorem states that positive linear operators converge uniformly to the identity on every continuous function if they do so on the three test functions .
Induct on , using the recursive divided-difference formula. After substituting the two induction hypotheses, use
and the analogous identity for ; adjacent terms telescope. This proves
Apply the Leibniz rule for divided differences to . Only the zeroth and first divided differences of the linear factor survive. After applying the normalization, this gives the Cox-de Boor recursion formula
The explicit divided difference formula makes a finite linear combination of . It is therefore polynomial of degree at most between knots and globally . For , the nodal data come from a polynomial of degree , whose order- divided difference vanishes; for all truncated powers vanish. Thus
and normalization does not change the degree, smoothness, knots, or support.
Twice applying the fundamental theorem of calculus gives
hence . Part (b) gives . This cannot be little- for every function: for ,
The Fejér kernel is nonnegative, and preservation of constants gives
By evenness,
Put . Use together with and . Splitting at and shows that the remaining weighted integral is uniformly bounded, so
Substituting the Fourier coefficients into the Fourier partial sum and summing the finite geometric series gives
where
Since ,
Choose . For , , so each of these same-sign terms has magnitude at least . The remaining tail is . Hence
Thus does not imply ; the logarithmic gap prevents a characterization of that approximation class by this first modulus alone.
The inverse theorem for trigonometric approximation gives
Summing proves
For , part (a) gives . If , an increment at has nonnegative summands and its term is . Part (c) handles . Therefore
The trigonometric Chebyshev alternation theorem says that is best exactly when its error has at least cyclically ordered extrema of equal magnitude and alternating sign. Let and set . For every ,
Thus
There are such extrema, while the triangle inequality bounds the tail by their common magnitude. Hence
The body now returns on a bound, highly eccentric orbit whose periapsis crosses more deeply into the planet's neighborhood. Repeated planetary scattering produces a sequence of energy and angular-momentum kicks rather than smooth secular evolution. Possible endpoints include ejection onto an unbound orbit, collision with the planet or star, tidal disruption, or diffusion onto a detached orbit that no longer encounters the planet. Temporary protection by a mean-motion resonance is also possible. The approximate Tisserand parameter constrains weak separated encounters, but the close-encounter sequence is chaotic and does not select a unique final orbit.
The specific orbital energy changes by , so a marginally bound orbit becomes more tightly bound. Neglecting its tiny initial binding energy,
To obtain the new periapsis, put and . Immediately after the encounter,
Using the post-encounter energy and angular momentum in the Kepler orbit relations and retaining gives
The inward radial kick therefore lowers the next periapsis as well as shrinking the semi-major axis.
In the planetocentric frame, the incoming relative velocity is prograde and the encounter outside the planet bends it inward through , without changing . In the inertial frame , so
Substitution of the previous result yields the negative gravitational assist energy kick
Let . At periapsis the nearly parabolic planetesimal and planet have parallel speeds and , so
For a passage just outside the planet, the impact parameter is . In the small-angle limit of the supplied gravitational scattering angle,
Thus

Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project

Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
We have two killer features:
  1. topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculus
    Articles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
    • a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
    • a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
    This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.
    Figure 1.
    Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page
    . View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivative
  2. local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:
    This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
    Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally.
    Video 3.
    Edit locally and publish demo
    . Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension.
  3. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook-media/master/feature/x/hilbert-space-arrow.png
  4. Infinitely deep tables of contents:
    Figure 6.
    Dynamic article tree with infinitely deep table of contents
    .
    Descendant pages can also show up as toplevel e.g.: ourbigbook.com/cirosantilli/chordate-subclade
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact