At , the piston velocity reaches
The simple-wave relation then gives and . For later times the formal continuation would require negative sound speed, so the gas can no longer follow the piston. By vacuum formation behind a receding piston, a vacuum region opens between and the gas edge
The earlier rarefaction solution remains to the right of , while is vacuum.
The undisturbed gas has , , and hence . The disturbance from the receding piston is a right-moving simple wave, so this invariant remains zero throughout it:
Let be the time at which the relevant characteristic leaves the piston. The boundary condition is there. Both and are constant along this characteristic, whose speed is
Hence is determined implicitly by the receding-piston rarefaction wave equation
Within , the solution is therefore
For , the gas remains undisturbed: and . The speed bound keeps and positive, and monotonic increase of makes this an expanding rarefaction wave rather than a characteristic-crossing compression.
Assume (iii). Fix and , and define
This is a stopping time: . Applying (iii) at time first to and then to the deterministic stopping time gives
Subtracting yields
By the defining characterization of conditional expectation, this says . Thus is a martingale, proving (i). Together the three implications establish the characterization of a martingale by stopped expectations.
Assume (i), and let be a stopping time. The increments of the stopped process satisfy
Because , taking conditional expectation given makes the right-hand side zero. Integrability follows from
a finite sum of integrable random variables. Hence is a martingale, proving (ii).
Because almost surely, no infinite portion of the jump chain is hidden inside a finite time interval. After either chain leaves a state , the event that it ever returns is therefore the same event for both chains. Hence irreducibility and recurrence pass between a CTMC and its jump chain gives
The jump chain of is exactly : from it visits next with probability . Consequently the two chains have exactly the same directed paths of positive-probability transitions. Thus
Combining the preceding parts,
This is the characteristic function of . The uniqueness theorem for characteristic functions therefore gives
When , this means the degenerate distribution concentrated at the origin. This proves the Maxwell characterization of the normal distribution.
First, . For every ,
It cannot vanish: if for some , then
would imply for every positive integer , contradicting continuity at zero. Thus . Since every characteristic function has modulus at most one,
Now set . It is continuous, nonnegative, and additive:
The classification of a continuous additive function on the nonnegative real numbers gives , where . Consequently
Independence of the coordinates gives factorization of their joint characteristic function of a random vector. Orthogonal invariance under coordinate permutations makes all coordinate marginals identical. Hence, for and ,
Therefore
For an orthogonal matrix , invariance in distribution gives
The orthogonal group is transitive on each Euclidean sphere, so depends only on . Define
The continuity of a characteristic function makes continuous. Taking also gives , and hence
so is real-valued. Thus
as for every orthogonally invariant random vector.
The irreducible affine hypersurface in the -plane has dimension one, while a closed point has dimension zero. Therefore
The curve has dimension one. Its tangent has dimension one at every point except the origin and dimension two at the origin. By the smooth locus of a variety,
and the origin is its unique singular point of an algebraic variety. Each reduced point component has dimension zero and zero-dimensional tangent space, so both and are smooth on their respective components.
Let be a tangent vector in the directions. At a point , the two isolated components are absent in a Zariski neighbourhood, so the Zariski tangent space is that of . Differentiating and gives
For this is a line. At the cusp,
which is two-dimensional.
Each of and is a reduced isolated component with local ring , so
This last conclusion must use all functions in , as required by the definition of the Zariski tangent space. The Jacobian of only the three displayed defining polynomials has an extra spurious tangent direction at , because those polynomials do not generate the radical ideal there; for example, removes that direction.
Write
The equation splits the analysis into two cases. If , the remaining equation is , giving the cuspidal cubic
It is irreducible because is irreducible in : as a quadratic in , it could factor only if were a square in .
If , the other equations become
Their solutions are , which already lies on , and the two points
Thus the irreducible components are
Equivalently, the radical ideal of the cusp with two isolated-point components is
When is odd there is no alternating sign mode. The same cosine-sine construction gives invariant irreducible planes for
again pairwise nonisomorphic because their generator traces are distinct. The real Fourier decomposition is
Its dimensions sum to . Thus the real regular representation of a finite cyclic group has one one-dimensional irreducible summand and nonisomorphic two-dimensional irreducible summands.
Let be the standard basis and let the generator send to modulo . The constant vector
spans a trivial module. Since is even, the alternating vector
spans a sign module on which acts by .
For each , define the real discrete Fourier modes
The plane is invariant, and acts on it by rotation through . Since this angle is neither zero nor , is irreducible over . The traces are distinct for , so these modules are pairwise nonisomorphic. Orthogonality of the discrete Fourier transform gives
The dimensions sum to , so this is the whole regular module: two nonisomorphic one-dimensional summands and nonisomorphic two-dimensional summands.
The two irreducible real modules and are nonisomorphic, so the kernel-image argument from part (a), which is valid over any field, gives
Every endomorphism of the one-dimensional trivial module is scalar:
Identify the oriented plane with , so that acts by multiplication by . A real-linear map commutes with this rotation exactly when it is multiplication by a complex number. Equivalently,
where is rotation through . Taking gives a nonscalar intertwining endomorphism of an irreducible real representation. This is the Failure of the scalar conclusion of Schur lemma over the real numbers.
Let and let be the standard basis of its real regular representation, with modulo three. Set
Both are invariant, they are orthogonal, and
The line is the trivial representation. On the plane , the generator acts as a rotation through . Such a rotation has no real eigenline, so has no nonzero proper invariant real subspace and is irreducible.
The maximum flow is not unique. For any , set
and split the flow from by
Flow conservation then requires
All capacities are respected precisely throughout the displayed interval, and every member of this one-parameter family has value . For example, and give distinct maximum flows.

Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project

Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
We have two killer features:
  1. topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculus
    Articles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
    • a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
    • a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
    This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.
    Figure 1.
    Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page
    . View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivative
  2. local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:
    This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
    Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally.
    Video 3.
    Edit locally and publish demo
    . Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension.
  3. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook-media/master/feature/x/hilbert-space-arrow.png
  4. Infinitely deep tables of contents:
    Figure 6.
    Dynamic article tree with infinitely deep table of contents
    .
    Descendant pages can also show up as toplevel e.g.: ourbigbook.com/cirosantilli/chordate-subclade
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact