Topics (384k) Articles (398k) Users (410) Discussions (242) Comments (383) Files (13k) New article
Frame dragging is the influence of mass-energy currents, especially rotation, on local inertial directions in general relativity. In a stationary axisymmetric metric tensor, an observer with zero angular momentum has coordinate angular velocity when the other spatial coordinates are held fixed. Around a rotating source this can be nonzero even without an applied azimuthal torque.
Gravity Probe B tested the effect with four cryogenic gyroscopes in Earth orbit, comparing their spin directions with a guide-star reference. Its analysis separated the much larger geodetic precession from the smaller rotation-dependent drift. This tests a change of inertial orientation, rather than ordinary frictional dragging of the spacecraft.[ref]
The Kasha-Vavilov rule states that the quantum yield of luminescence is normally independent of excitation wavelength. IUPAC explicitly notes exceptions.[ref]
IUPAC Compendium of Chemical Terminology, fifth edition (Gold Book). Kasha–Vavilov rule K03371
The statement concerns emitted photons per absorbed photon, not equal detector counts under equal incident optical power.An original photon-accounting model writesfor monochromatic incident power , wavelength and absorbance . Comparing raw fluorescence at different wavelengths without correcting incident photon number and absorbed fraction can therefore give a misleading yield comparison.
For equal incident powers and equal absorbed fractions at 400 and 500 nm, the absorbed photon rates have ratio . A molecule obeying the rule with unchanged yield then emits 25% more photons per second under the 500 nm condition. Unequal raw emission is entirely consistent with equal emitted-per-absorbed-photon yield.
Absorbed-photon normalization in quantum-yield comparisons also needs detector-response correction. The observation system measures a selected fraction of an emission spectrum, not automatically all emitted photons. Keep excitation and emission spectral responses, sample geometry and optical density in the comparison.
The distinction from Kasha's rule is physical as well as verbal. Kasha's rule concerns the emitting electronic state. Suppose a wavelength-dependent fraction of absorbed excitations reaches the same emitting state, whose radiative and nonradiative rates are . ThenThe same emitting state and band shape can coexist with a wavelength-dependent yield if upstream branching changes. Fast molecular internal conversion can make the simple wavelength-independent approximation useful, but does not prove it for every system.
A proposed experiment compares corrected integrated emission with absorbed photon counts while checking concentration, chemical stability and competing absorption. A persistent excitation-dependent yield after those corrections is a scientific result to explain, rather than something to normalize away by assuming the rule in advance.
Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project
Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
Intro to OurBigBook
. Source. We have two killer features:
- topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculusArticles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
- a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
- a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.Figure 1. Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page. View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivativeVideo 2. OurBigBook Web topics demo. Source. - local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
- to OurBigBook.com to get awesome multi-user features like topics and likes
- as HTML files to a static website, which you can host yourself for free on many external providers like GitHub Pages, and remain in full control
Figure 2. You can publish local OurBigBook lightweight markup files to either OurBigBook.com or as a static website.Figure 3. Visual Studio Code extension installation.Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally. Video 3. Edit locally and publish demo. Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension. - Infinitely deep tables of contents:
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact





