With independent samples and finite variance, Monte Carlo integration has a root-mean-square stochastic error proportional to . The estimated standard error measures that random sampling uncertainty; it is not a deterministic bound.
For a sufficiently smooth one-dimensional integrand, the composite trapezoidal rule has error
for some , hence . It is normally much more efficient in one dimension. The stated continuity assumption alone guarantees convergence, but does not guarantee this second-order rate; bounded second derivatives are an additional assumption.
The dimensional advantage is different: a tensor grid with total points in dimensions has only about points per direction and typically error . The Monte Carlo exponent remains , although its variance prefactor can still deteriorate with dimension. This explains why the stochastic method becomes attractive for high-dimensional integrals.
Most high-dimensional phase space has negligible equilibrium probability. Uniform sampling spends nearly all its work in these irrelevant regions and seldom visits the small subset that dominates the partition function or the numerator of an equilibrium average. The resulting estimator can have enormous variance.
Importance sampling places samples where the product of statistical weight and observable matters. Sampling the Boltzmann distribution, for example, converts a weighted phase-space integral into an equilibrium expectation. If a Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm is used, adequate exploration of separate free-energy basins and allowance for autocorrelation remain necessary.
For a fixed- canonical ensemble, sample the normalized Boltzmann distribution in phase space:
After integrating out the momenta for an ordinary separable Hamiltonian mechanics, configurational sampling uses . The correct equilibrium distribution is ensemble-dependent; the Boltzmann form is the canonical answer, rather than a universal prescription for every possible ensemble.
The constant density is reasonable when the integrand has comparable magnitude throughout the interval. It is inefficient for a narrow peak because most samples contribute little while rare samples carry large weights.
For independent importance sampling,
A good density has support wherever , is easy to sample and evaluate, and resembles . Subject to normalization, minimizes this variance. For nonnegative , the ideal normalized choice makes every sample contribution equal, although its normalization is generally the unknown integral itself. Uniform weighting is therefore acceptable for a flat integrand, not universally suitable.
A weighting function must first be normalized to a probability density. The constant choice on means
Equivalently, transform and use the already normalized on . Independent samples give the unbiased Monte Carlo integration estimator
function uniform_monte_carlo(f, a, b, N):
    require N >= 2
    total = 0
    total_squared = 0
    for j in 1,...,N:
        u = independent_uniform_0_1()
        value = f(a+(b-a)*u)
        total += value
        total_squared += value*value
    average = total/N
    sample_variance = (total_squared-N*average*average)/(N-1)
    integral = (b-a)*average
    standard_error = abs(b-a)*sqrt(sample_variance/N)
    return integral, standard_error
For a general positive normalized importance density , replace each sample contribution by with . Here the uniform choice is the special case of importance sampling that assigns equal weight to every region of equal length.
Both rules use a uniform partition with . An original implementation in pseudocode is:
function trapezoid(f, a, b, n):
    dx = (b-a)/n
    total = (f(a)+f(b))/2
    for j in 1,...,n-1:
        total += f(a+j*dx)
    return dx*total

function midpoint(f, a, b, n):
    dx = (b-a)/n
    total = 0
    for j in 0,...,n-1:
        total += f(a+(j+1/2)*dx)
    return dx*total
The trapezoidal rule gives each endpoint half weight; the composite midpoint rule uses one interior point per subinterval. Both converge for a continuous integrand on the closed interval.
The second equality in the printed trapezoidal hint is missing a factor . The average of the left and right rectangle sums is required. For , the uncorrected equality would return instead of .
The key sequence is deprotonation, anionic eight-pi electrocyclization, then elimination. Label the conjugated route from the lower cyclopentene to the right cyclopentene as
where is the methylene joining the lower ring to the central alkene, and carries the substituent.
potassium hexamethyldisilazide removes a proton at . The resulting anion is delocalized over the seven-carbon array: its six pi-bond electrons plus the lone pair make an eight-electron system. Thermal electrocyclic reaction is disrotatory for this electron count. Joining and forms the seven-membered central ring and puts the remaining anionic character at , with double bonds at and .
That anion then forms , expelling the O-dimethylcarbamate group from the attached methylene. This E1cb elimination supplies the exocyclic methylene and explains why no oxygen remains in the depicted product. The disrotatory closure, with the cyclopentene ends folded to avoid unfavorable overlap, gives the trans relationship between the two lower fused-ring bonds shown by the wedge and dash. A simple [3,3] rearrangement would not create the required bond between the two remote cyclopentene termini.
A is the kinetic, less-hindered-side silyl enol ether. Its double bond lies away from the methyl substituent. Forming B requires removal of a proton from the more hindered position adjacent to the methyl-bearing carbon.
The base strengths alone do not determine the ratios. trimethylsilyl triflate is strongly electrophilic: oxygen silylation activates the ketone towards deprotonation, and irreversible trapping of the resulting silyl enol ether can make the product ratio reflect competing deprotonation rates. A weak amine therefore need not first produce a substantial equilibrium concentration of the free ketone enolate.
DBU is the strongest and comparatively accessible base, and distinguishes the two sites least strongly, giving the smallest A:B ratio. Triethylamine gives greater preference for the less-hindered site. The more sterically hindered diisopropylethylamine discriminates most strongly and gives the largest proportion of A. Its slightly higher conjugate-acid than that of triethylamine does not reverse this trend, because steric accessibility and the coupled silylation/deprotonation mechanism matter alongside basicity. The data do not establish a simple thermodynamic enolate distribution.
This is an Ireland–Claisen rearrangement. Number the ester carbonyl carbon , its enolizable carbon , and the three allylic ring carbons , starting at the carbon bearing the ester oxygen.
lithium hexamethyldisilazide removes an proton and trimethylsilyl chloride traps the oxygen of the resulting ester enolate, giving a silyl ketene acetal. Heating permits a six-electron, [3,3]-sigmatropic rearrangement through the array
The electron-pair movements are , , and . Acidic work-up cleaves the silyl ester to the carboxylic acid. The benzyl ether remains a protecting group; it is not the migrating bond.
The suprafacial reaction transfers the starting allylic stereochemistry to , where the new side chain is delivered from the original oxygen face. In the product's printed orientation, the new C–C bond is behind the ring and the C methyl group is toward the viewer. At that ring star, the Cahn-Ingold-Prelog priority rules orders the groups as side chain, alkenyl ring direction, saturated ring direction, methyl, giving .
The second star is . Its priorities are carboxyl, substituted ring carbon, , H. A chair-like transition state normally places the bulky side chain pseudoequatorial. However, its absolute configuration also depends on the E/Z geometry of the trapped silyl ketene acetal: opposite geometries give opposite configurations at this star under the same suprafacial ring transfer. The printed conditions do not state solvent or the ketene-acetal geometry. Thus the secure assignment is the ring-star configuration and conditional -star stereochemistry, rather than an unqualified absolute assignment to both stars. Drawing the assumed ketene-acetal geometry and its chair is necessary before selecting one epimer.

Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project

Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
We have two killer features:
  1. topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculus
    Articles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
    • a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
    • a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
    This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.
    Figure 1.
    Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page
    . View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivative
  2. local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:
    This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
    Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally.
    Video 3.
    Edit locally and publish demo
    . Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension.
  3. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook-media/master/feature/x/hilbert-space-arrow.png
  4. Infinitely deep tables of contents:
    Figure 6.
    Dynamic article tree with infinitely deep table of contents
    .
    Descendant pages can also show up as toplevel e.g.: ourbigbook.com/cirosantilli/chordate-subclade
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact