Let be the Holder conjugate exponent of . On with Lebesgue measure, the duality of Lp spaces is
under the pairing . Thus , while for the dual exponent satisfies .
A Banach space is reflexive when its canonical map into its bidual is surjective. The spaces are reflexive exactly for
For these exponents, applying duality twice identifies the bidual with . The endpoint spaces and are not reflexive; for example, disjoint unit cubes give closed copies of and , respectively.
Integration gives an isometric embedding , but it is not onto. On the subspace
define , the limit at infinity. Since , the Hahn-Banach theorem extends to all of . If this extension were integration against some , its vanishing on every compactly supported bounded function would force almost everywhere, but . Therefore
This is the Dual of L infinity is larger than L1.
For , the Lebesgue space consists of equivalence classes modulo equality almost everywhere of measurable functions satisfying
The space consists of essentially bounded measurable functions modulo equality almost everywhere, with norm
Let and put . By Hölder's inequality,
Taking th roots gives
For , directly integrating gives the same endpoint estimate. Hence when , as in Lp inclusion on a finite measure space.
For every finite scalar sequence with , define a bounded linear functional on the continuous dual space by
For each fixed , the hypothesis gives
where the supremum is over all finite choices and the phases may be chosen to align the complex numbers .
The dual is a Banach space even when is incomplete. The Uniform boundedness principle therefore gives a constant such that
For each , choose for so that . Then
Letting proves
This is the uniform bound from pointwise absolute summability of dual evaluations.
For , choose with and define
The sequence on the right is Cauchy because
and it converges because is complete. The same estimate shows that the limit is independent of the approximating sequence, is linear, and satisfies
Its norm is at most , while restriction to gives the reverse inequality, so
Any two continuous extensions agree on the dense set and hence everywhere, proving uniqueness. This is the extension of a bounded linear operator from a dense subspace.
Completeness of was never used, so the result remains true when is incomplete. Completeness of is essential. For example, with , let the codomain be the incomplete normed space with the norm and let be the identity. An extension would have to send every limit in to itself and therefore could not take values in . This is the failure of dense-subspace extension into an incomplete codomain.
Let be Cauchy in the operator norm on . For each ,
so is Cauchy in the Banach space . Define
Pointwise passage to the limit shows that is linear. A norm-Cauchy sequence is bounded, say , and hence
Thus is bounded. Finally, for fixed ,
The right-hand coefficient tends to zero with , so in operator norm. Therefore
This is the Banach space of bounded linear operators.
Let . Define a surjection
Its kernel determines a connected regular four-sheeted cover of a wedge of circles and a real projective plane, say .
Use the CW structure on with one vertex, one edge for every and for , and one two-cell attached along . In the regular cover, the degree-two cellular chain group is
The cellular boundary formula gives the lifted attaching word the boundary
in the -edge summand of . Therefore
There are no three-cells, so
If were homotopy equivalent to a compact connected surface , the subgroup corresponding to this cover would produce a connected four-sheeted cover homotopy equivalent to . A finite cover of a compact surface is again a compact connected surface. But the integral top homology of a compact connected surface has rank at most one, contradicting the displayed rank two. Hence is not homotopy equivalent to a compact connected surface for any .
The wedge intersection is simply connected after taking suitable neighbourhoods, so repeated application of the Seifert-van Kampen theorem gives the free product of copies of with
Thus, for any basepoint,
This is the fundamental group of a wedge of circles and a real projective plane.
Let , where , , and are path-connected subcomplexes containing the basepoint; small open neighbourhoods may be used to reduce to the usual open-cover statement. The Seifert-van Kampen theorem says that
More explicitly, this is the quotient of the free product by the normal closure of
Equivalently, is the pushout of the two inclusion-induced homomorphisms.
Let with primes and nonabelian. The Sylow theorems give and , so and the Sylow -subgroup is normal. Also and . If , both Sylow subgroups are normal and is their abelian direct product, a contradiction. Hence , and
Because is abelian, the commutator subgroup lies in . It is nontrivial because is nonabelian, and is prime, so . Therefore
and has exactly linear characters.
Every nonlinear irreducible degree divides . Its square is at most , so the only possibility is degree . If there are such characters, the sum of squares of irreducible degrees gives
The number of irreducible characters equals the number of conjugacy classes, so
These are the irreducible characters of a nonabelian group of order p q.
Suppose a finite simple group had an irreducible representation of degree two. Its kernel is normal and cannot be the whole group, so is faithful. A nonabelian simple group has no nontrivial linear character; consequently is trivial and .
Since by degree divisibility, Cauchy's theorem for finite groups gives an involution . A nonidentity matrix of order two in has both eigenvalues , hence equals . Thus is central in . Faithfulness makes central in , contradicting the trivial centre of a nonabelian simple group. Therefore no finite simple group has an irreducible character of degree two.
For , every group of order four is abelian. Now let be odd. Degree divisibility and the sum-of-squares formula show that every nonlinear irreducible character has degree two: the other divisors and have squares larger than .
Let be the number of linear characters and the number of degree-two characters. The linear characters are precisely the characters of the abelianization, so
The degree-sum formula gives
so . Among the divisors of , this forces or . In the latter case and all degrees are one. In the former,
Thus the degrees are
unless they are all one.
Let . By irreducible character degree divides the group order, each irreducible degree divides . A degree is at most by the sum of squares of irreducible degrees. If a degree occurred, its square would already consume the entire sum , leaving no room for the trivial character. Hence every irreducible degree is one. A finite group has only linear irreducible characters exactly when it is abelian, so every group of order is abelian.
Put and . The automorphism-count bound for a finite field extension gives
For the reverse inequality, let be linearly independent over . We claim that the matrix
has linearly independent columns over . If not, choose a nonzero relation
with the fewest nonzero coefficients, and normalize one coefficient to . Applying and reindexing the rows gives another relation with coefficients . Subtracting eliminates the first term, so minimality forces for every and . Thus every . The row for the identity automorphism then contradicts the -linear independence of the .
Therefore . Taking an -basis of gives , and hence
This proves the degree assertion in the Artin fixed-field theorem.
The class of well-orderings is not first-order axiomatizable. If axiomatized it, add constants and sentences
Every finite subset has a finite well-order containing the required finite descending chain. By the compactness theorem, the whole set has a model; that model satisfies but contains an infinite descending chain, so it is not a well-order. This contradiction proves the claim, as summarized by well-orders are not first-order axiomatizable.
The class is axiomatizable by the partial order axioms together with totality:
Explicitly, the remaining axioms state reflexivity, antisymmetry, and transitivity. This is the first-order axiomatization of total orders.
This class is the class of torsion-free groups and is axiomatizable. Take the group axioms and, for every integer , the sentence
These sentences exclude every nonidentity element of finite order and give the first-order axiomatization of torsion-free groups.

There are unlisted articles, also show them or only show them.