The finite-horizon discrete-time fundamental theorem of asset pricing states that the market has no arbitrage if and only if there exists a probability measure equivalent to under which every integrable discounted asset price is a martingale. Such a is an equivalent martingale measure.
Let denote wealth measured in units of the strictly positive numéraire. A predictable self-financing portfolio is an arbitrage if
Equivalently, one may permit provided one of the two gains is strict.
The multivariate Wald statistic for a proposed value is
Because and
Slutsky theorem gives
If is the -quantile of the chi-squared distribution with degrees of freedom, an asymptotic confidence region is
In this known-identity-covariance model one may replace by ; then the confidence ball is exact. For an individual coordinate, the corresponding exact confidence interval is
The maximum-likelihood estimator is
Under the score-outer-product convention stated in the question,
This is the sample covariance matrix with divisor . The strong law of large numbers, applied entrywise, gives
Thus the empirical score outer-product information consistently estimates the per-observation Fisher information.
For one observation with density , the Fisher information matrix at is
Here
Since , the Fisher information of a multivariate normal location model is
The information in the full independent sample is by Tensorization of Fisher information.
First intersect with a sufficiently large bounded interval to obtain a finite positive-measure set. By the Lebesgue density theorem, this set has a density-one point . Hence, for every , some sufficiently small interval centred at satisfies
which is the high-density interval in a positive-measure subset of the real line.
To obtain the final claim, choose , put , and translate into . Write
Part (f), after rescaling the interval length, gives
Thus contains an open interval around zero, which is the Steinhaus theorem.
Let . Both and its translate lie in an interval of length . By finite additivity and translation invariance of Lebesgue measure,
Choose . Then and , so . Therefore the difference-set overlap bound on an interval gives
Yes. In fact, measurability of is unnecessary. Define the oscillation
For every , the set is open, and is continuous at exactly when . Hence the continuity set of a function is
a set and therefore a Borel set.
A function is Borel measurable when
is a Borel set for every Borel set . It is enough to require this for every open set, or for every interval of the form .
The rational numbers are countable, so
is a countable union of closed sets and hence a Borel set; its Lebesgue measure is zero. Its complement is also Borel and has infinite measure:
The intervals are nested in the relevant directions, and the strongest lower and upper restrictions both occur at :
Thus this set is closed, hence Borel, and
A set is Lebesgue measurable if it satisfies the Caratheodory criterion
for every , where is Lebesgue outer measure. Equivalently, belongs to the completion of the Borel sigma-algebra with respect to Lebesgue measure.
No. The missing point is not assumed to complete as a smooth surface, so the hypotheses of the global Gauss-Bonnet theorem do not apply to .
For a concrete counterexample, rotate a smooth simple arc , parametrized by arc length for , about the -axis. Arrange that it starts smoothly on the axis,
stays in for , and converges to another point of the axis as , with
The endpoint is omitted. The resulting surface of revolution is diffeomorphic to minus one point, and adjoining its limiting endpoint makes the set compact.
For an arc-length surface of revolution,
Therefore the total Gaussian curvature of a punctured surface with a singular compactification point is
which can take values different from . Compactness of the one-point closure alone therefore does not determine the integral.
The global Gauss-Bonnet theorem for a compact oriented surface without boundary is
For a connected closed orientable surface of genus , this is
For a local parametrization , write the first fundamental form and second fundamental form as
The Gaussian curvature is
To prove the Theorema Egregium, set and decompose
Differentiating and solving for the tangential coefficients gives
so every Christoffel symbol depends only on and their first derivatives. Equality of mixed third derivatives yields the Gauss equation
The Riemann curvature tensor is formed from first derivatives and quadratic products of the Christoffel symbols, and hence from the first and second derivatives of . Consequently
depends only on the first fundamental form.
Define
If is a divisor class of degree zero, Riemann--Roch gives , because and the divisor has negative degree. A nonzero section therefore yields
for some point , proving that is surjective. If , then is a principal divisor. For its defining function would have one simple pole and give a degree-one map , impossible for a genus-one curve. Thus . The map and its inverse are regular, so this proves the Abel-Jacobi map of a genus-one curve is an isomorphism.
Transport the addition of the divisor class group through : define by
Then is the identity, and this is the chord-and-tangent group law on the plane cubic.
For the displayed equation, inversion is . Thus exactly when . Besides the point at infinity , this requires . Therefore the complete set of two-torsion points is
Choose a point . Since , a nonzero regular differential has an effective divisor of degree , so . The Riemann-Roch theorem therefore gives
Choose
The rational functions and have their only poles at , of orders two and three respectively.
The seven functions
belong to the six-dimensional Riemann-Roch space , so they satisfy a nontrivial linear relation. Comparing pole orders shows that the coefficients of both and are nonzero. After rescaling, the relation has the Weierstrass form
The divisor is very ample, so its complete linear system embeds in and the displayed relation cuts out its image; this is the Weierstrass construction from Riemann-Roch in genus one.
Because , completing the square removes the terms linear in , and because , translating removes the quadratic term. Thus the equation becomes
Since is algebraically closed, the cubic factors as
Smoothness of says that the elliptic-curve discriminant is nonzero, equivalently the three roots are distinct. Hence

There are unlisted articles, also show them or only show them.