The closed bounded set is compact by the Heine-Borel theorem. Choose a convergent subsequence . For fixed and sufficiently large , monotonicity gives
Continuity and passage to the limit give for every , hence .
For the deduction, set . These functions are continuous, decrease pointwise, and tend to zero. If convergence were not uniform, some would admit with . The result just proved would produce with , contradicting pointwise convergence. Therefore uniformly. This is Dini's theorem.
The sequence converges uniformly to on when, for every , there is such that
for every .
The function is uniformly continuous when, for every , there is such that and imply . The same works throughout the domain.
Translate the variable by one:
This satisfies Eisenstein criterion with : every nonleading coefficient is divisible by , while . Translation is an automorphism of a polynomial ring, so it preserves irreducibility. Hence is irreducible over .
Eisenstein criterion states that if
has a prime number such that , for every , and , then is irreducible over .
After dividing out the polynomial content, suppose for contradiction that the resulting primitive polynomial factors as with positive-degree , using Gauss lemma for polynomials. Reduction modulo gives , so in the polynomial ring both and are monomials. Because both factors have positive degree, their constant coefficients are divisible by . Their product is then divisible by , a contradiction.
Gauss lemma for polynomials says that the product of two primitive polynomials in is primitive. Equivalently, a primitive polynomial in is reducible over exactly when it is reducible over .
Let be an ideal of and contract it to
This is an ideal of , so because is a principal ideal domain. Every is a unit in a ring . Consequently, if , then , so and . Conversely , hence every multiple of it belongs to . Thus
so every ideal of is principal. The localization remains an integral domain; hence is a principal ideal domain.
Let . Since a principal ideal domain is an integral domain and , is a multiplicative subset avoiding zero. The stated equivalence relation and operations are precisely those of the localization of a ring .
For completeness, reflexivity and symmetry are immediate, while transitivity follows by multiplying the two cross-multiplication identities and cancelling a nonzero power of . If and , cross multiplication shows that the proposed sums and products are equivalent. Thus the operations do not depend on representatives. The usual fraction calculations then prove associativity, commutativity and distributivity, with identities and . Therefore is a well-defined commutative ring.
Measure vertices by their Hamming distance from the target and let be the expected hitting time when that distance is . We already know . From distance one, one of the coordinate flips reaches the target and the other flips move to distance two. First-step analysis therefore gives
For ,
Let be the expected hitting time from any neighbour of the origin back to the origin. After the first step, the return-time calculation from part (i) gives
so . Translation by the target vertex is a graph automorphism of the hypercube that exchanges the origin and that adjacent vertex, so the reverse expected hitting time is the same. Hence
For a finite irreducible Markov chain with invariant distribution , the mean recurrence time of state is
The simple random walk on the hypercube has the uniform invariant distribution because the hypercube graph is regular, so every vertex has mass . Therefore the expected first positive return time to the initial vertex is
The homogeneous solutions are not -periodic unless , so there is a unique periodic solution. For a forcing term , a trial solution gives
Using the Fourier series from part (a), for which only odd occur and , yields
The coefficients decay fast enough to differentiate the series twice term by term, verifying the equation and periodicity.
The function is an even function, so every sine Fourier coefficient vanishes. Direct integration gives
Thus
for the -periodic extension.
Take the parabolic element of PSL2(R)
It fixes no point in . A Geodesic in the Poincare half-plane model is determined by its unordered pair of ideal endpoints: either two real numbers or one real number together with . Translation adds one to every finite endpoint, so no such pair is invariant. Therefore this preserves neither a point nor a hyperbolic line in .
A fixed point of satisfies
Its discriminant is
where was used. Thus the two roots are nonreal complex conjugates, and exactly one lies in the upper half-plane. Consequently every elliptic element of PSL2(R) fixes a point of .
Write and , so its Möbius transformation is , with . For , the Hyperbolic distance in the Poincare half-plane satisfies
At , the final parenthesis is . Since is strictly increasing on nonnegative arguments, every off the imaginary axis has
The characteristic polynomial of is
When , its discriminant is positive, so has two distinct real eigenvalues and two independent real eigenvectors. Let have those eigenvectors as columns. Rescaling one column makes without changing the diagonalization. Hence and
This is the normal form of a hyperbolic element of PSL2(R).
Write the function from the preceding part as . Its expansion at zero is
Hence the residue theorem gives
Choose . This circle stays a distance at least from every pole of , so is bounded uniformly on it. Moreover
Thus , and the ML inequality yields
Letting solves the Basel problem:
The function has a simple pole of residue at every , because there. At , the term in cancels the principal part of . For , the summand
has residue at each of , so it cancels the corresponding pole of . Therefore all possible singularities of in are removable singularities: they are and for . After filling them in, is analytic throughout that disc.

There are unlisted articles, also show them or only show them.