Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 ib Paper 3 12F c Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-03
The closed bounded set is compact by the Heine-Borel theorem. Choose a convergent subsequence . For fixed and sufficiently large , monotonicity givesContinuity and passage to the limit give for every , hence .
For the deduction, set . These functions are continuous, decrease pointwise, and tend to zero. If convergence were not uniform, some would admit with . The result just proved would produce with , contradicting pointwise convergence. Therefore uniformly. This is Dini's theorem.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 ib Paper 3 12F b ii Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 ib Paper 3 12F b i Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 ib Paper 3 12F a Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-03
The function is uniformly continuous when, for every , there is such that and imply . The same works throughout the domain.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 ib Paper 3 11G c Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-03
Translate the variable by one:This satisfies Eisenstein criterion with : every nonleading coefficient is divisible by , while . Translation is an automorphism of a polynomial ring, so it preserves irreducibility. Hence is irreducible over .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 ib Paper 3 11G b Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-03
Eisenstein criterion states that ifhas a prime number such that , for every , and , then is irreducible over .
After dividing out the polynomial content, suppose for contradiction that the resulting primitive polynomial factors as with positive-degree , using Gauss lemma for polynomials. Reduction modulo gives , so in the polynomial ring both and are monomials. Because both factors have positive degree, their constant coefficients are divisible by . Their product is then divisible by , a contradiction.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 ib Paper 3 11G a Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-03
Gauss lemma for polynomials says that the product of two primitive polynomials in is primitive. Equivalently, a primitive polynomial in is reducible over exactly when it is reducible over .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 ib Paper 2 2G b Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-03
Let be an ideal of and contract it toThis is an ideal of , so because is a principal ideal domain. Every is a unit in a ring . Consequently, if , then , so and . Conversely , hence every multiple of it belongs to . Thusso every ideal of is principal. The localization remains an integral domain; hence is a principal ideal domain.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 ib Paper 2 2G a Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-03
Let . Since a principal ideal domain is an integral domain and , is a multiplicative subset avoiding zero. The stated equivalence relation and operations are precisely those of the localization of a ring .
For completeness, reflexivity and symmetry are immediate, while transitivity follows by multiplying the two cross-multiplication identities and cancelling a nonzero power of . If and , cross multiplication shows that the proposed sums and products are equivalent. Thus the operations do not depend on representatives. The usual fraction calculations then prove associativity, commutativity and distributivity, with identities and . Therefore is a well-defined commutative ring.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 ib Paper 2 20H iii Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-03
Measure vertices by their Hamming distance from the target and let be the expected hitting time when that distance is . We already know . From distance one, one of the coordinate flips reaches the target and the other flips move to distance two. First-step analysis therefore givesFor ,
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 ib Paper 2 20H ii Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-03
Let be the expected hitting time from any neighbour of the origin back to the origin. After the first step, the return-time calculation from part (i) givesso . Translation by the target vertex is a graph automorphism of the hypercube that exchanges the origin and that adjacent vertex, so the reverse expected hitting time is the same. Hence
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 ib Paper 2 20H i Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-03
For a finite irreducible Markov chain with invariant distribution , the mean recurrence time of state isThe simple random walk on the hypercube has the uniform invariant distribution because the hypercube graph is regular, so every vertex has mass . Therefore the expected first positive return time to the initial vertex is
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 ib Paper 2 16A b Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-03
The homogeneous solutions are not -periodic unless , so there is a unique periodic solution. For a forcing term , a trial solution givesUsing the Fourier series from part (a), for which only odd occur and , yieldsThe coefficients decay fast enough to differentiate the series twice term by term, verifying the equation and periodicity.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 ib Paper 2 16A a Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-03
The function is an even function, so every sine Fourier coefficient vanishes. Direct integration givesThusfor the -periodic extension.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 ib Paper 2 14G d Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-05
Take the parabolic element of PSL2(R)It fixes no point in . A Geodesic in the Poincare half-plane model is determined by its unordered pair of ideal endpoints: either two real numbers or one real number together with . Translation adds one to every finite endpoint, so no such pair is invariant. Therefore this preserves neither a point nor a hyperbolic line in .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 ib Paper 2 14G c Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-05
A fixed point of satisfiesIts discriminant iswhere was used. Thus the two roots are nonreal complex conjugates, and exactly one lies in the upper half-plane. Consequently every elliptic element of PSL2(R) fixes a point of .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 ib Paper 2 14G b Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-03
Write and , so its Möbius transformation is , with . For , the Hyperbolic distance in the Poincare half-plane satisfiesAt , the final parenthesis is . Since is strictly increasing on nonnegative arguments, every off the imaginary axis has
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 ib Paper 2 14G a Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-05
The characteristic polynomial of isWhen , its discriminant is positive, so has two distinct real eigenvalues and two independent real eigenvectors. Let have those eigenvectors as columns. Rescaling one column makes without changing the diagonalization. Hence andThis is the normal form of a hyperbolic element of PSL2(R).
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 ib Paper 2 13A d Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-03
Write the function from the preceding part as . Its expansion at zero isHence the residue theorem givesChoose . This circle stays a distance at least from every pole of , so is bounded uniformly on it. MoreoverThus , and the ML inequality yieldsLetting solves the Basel problem:
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 ib Paper 2 13A c Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-03
The function has a simple pole of residue at every , because there. At , the term in cancels the principal part of . For , the summandhas residue at each of , so it cancels the corresponding pole of . Therefore all possible singularities of in are removable singularities: they are and for . After filling them in, is analytic throughout that disc.
There are unlisted articles, also show them or only show them.