The layer cake representation with gives
For each , split
Since and the maximal operator is sublinear,
The weak Hardy-Littlewood maximal inequality therefore gives
Substitution into the distribution formula and another application of Tonelli theorem yield
Thus the Strong Lp bound for the Hardy-Littlewood maximal function holds with
For every , the fundamental theorem of calculus gives
Apply this with . Since the integrand is nonnegative, Tonelli theorem permits exchanging the integrals:
This is the generalized layer cake representation.
Suppose is equicontinuous. At each , choose a neighbourhood such that
for every and every . If some differed from , the Urysohn lemma for the compact Hausdorff space would give a continuous function with and , a contradiction. Thus every singleton is open, so is discrete. A compact discrete space is finite, proving
Compactness is essential. Any infinite set with the discrete topology has equicontinuous , because the singleton neighbourhood works simultaneously for every function, but the space is infinite.
For each positive integer , apply the Stone-Weierstrass theorem on the closed ball to choose a polynomial in variables satisfying
Every compact lies in some such ball, so the same estimate for all sufficiently large proves that uniformly.
Now suppose instead that uniformly on all of . For sufficiently large , the polynomial is bounded on , and every nonconstant real polynomial is unbounded along a suitable line. Hence is constant. A tail of the sequence is therefore one fixed polynomial plus a uniformly convergent sequence of constants, and its limit is a polynomial. The converse is immediate from the constant sequence. Thus
This is the globally uniform limit of real polynomials criterion.
The Arzelà-Ascoli theorem says that a subset is relatively compact in the uniform norm exactly when it is equicontinuous and pointwise bounded.
The real Stone-Weierstrass theorem says that a real subalgebra is uniformly dense if it contains the constants and separates points of . In the complex version, a complex subalgebra must additionally be closed under complex conjugation.
For an example, take and
This family is bounded in the uniform norm, but it is not equicontinuous at . Equivalently, every subsequence converges pointwise to the discontinuous function that is zero on and one at , so no subsequence converges uniformly. Thus is bounded but not relatively compact.
The space is homeomorphic to , hence contractible and simply connected. Part (a) therefore identifies as the universal covering map. Its deck transformation group consists of the left translations by , so covering-space theory gives
Combining this with the homeomorphism from part (c),
For and , define
Changing or by an integer changes by left multiplication by an element of , so is independent of the chosen lifts. It also respects the mapping-torus seam because
which is exactly the identification
Every -orbit has a representative with its first coordinate in , so is surjective. If two such representatives lie in one orbit, the integer shift of their first coordinates is zero unless they are opposite endpoints; in the first case their torus coordinates agree, and in the endpoint case they are related by the displayed seam. Thus is injective. It is continuous, is compact, and is Hausdorff, so a continuous-bijection theorem gives
This realizes the Heisenberg nilmanifold as a torus mapping torus.
The map
is continuous and satisfies . Therefore
Write for the displayed upper-unitriangular matrix. Matrix multiplication gives
Thus is the real Heisenberg group and is its Integer Heisenberg group. The subgroup is discrete. Choose an identity neighbourhood so small that
Then the translates are pairwise disjoint, and the quotient map restricts on each one to a homeomorphism onto the same open subset of . Hence every point has an evenly covered neighbourhood and
This is the general quotient of a topological group by a discrete subgroup construction.
For , the fundamental discriminant is and the Minkowski bound for ideal classes is
Thus every ideal class contains an integral ideal of norm at most eight.
The ring of integers of a quadratic field is for , whose minimal polynomial is . Its discriminant is a quadratic nonresidue modulo each of and ; directly modulo two, has no root. Hence these primes are inert by the splitting of rational primes in a quadratic field. The only prime ideal over one of them with norm at most eight is , which has norm four and is principal. Unique prime ideal factorization now makes every ideal of norm at most eight principal. The Minkowski bound therefore proves
This is the Ideal class group of Q of square root of minus one hundred sixty-three.
Let
Its minimal polynomial is , and the algebraic norm gives
Suppose that is composite and choose a prime divisor . Since has the root modulo , the ideal
is a prime ideal of ideal norm . The triviality of the ideal class group makes principal, so .
The ring of integers of a quadratic field consists of elements
whose norm is . If , this norm is a square and cannot be the prime . If , then
and integrality gives , again a contradiction. Therefore the Euler prime-generating quadratic from class number one yields
Choose distinct primes . The moduli are pairwise coprime, so the Chinese remainder theorem supplies an integer satisfying
Consequently
so but . By the definition of a squarefull number, is therefore not squarefull. Adding a sufficiently large multiple of makes positive without changing any congruence. The integers are the required consecutive integers.
For pairwise coprime integers , put . The Chinese remainder theorem states that reduction gives an isomorphism
Equivalently, every system has one solution modulo .
For existence, let . Since , choose with . Then
has every required residue: modulo , all terms except the th vanish and the remaining term is . For uniqueness, if and have the same residues, every divides . Pairwise coprimality then makes divide . Thus the simultaneous solution exists and is unique modulo .
The commutator subgroup, or derived subgroup, is
A linear character is afforded by a one-dimensional representation . Since is abelian, every commutator lies in , so
Let be the quotient map. Every irreducible representation of a finite abelian group is one-dimensional, so each irreducible character of the abelianization inflates to the linear character of . Conversely, the containment makes every linear character of factor uniquely through . Thus inflation of a group representation gives a bijection
First consider a -free bipartite graph with parts , each of size at most , and edges. Count pairs in which is a -element subset of the graph neighbourhood of . Any vertices of have at most common neighbours, since common neighbours would form the complete bipartite graph . Consequently
If the average degree of a vertex is bounded in terms of , then and the required result is immediate. Otherwise, convexity of and the preceding inequality give
and hence . Every graph has a bipartite spanning subgraph containing at least half its edges, obtained by choosing a random bipartition. Applying the bipartite estimate to that subgraph proves the Kővári–Sós–Turán theorem in the required form:
The stated "nice" subsets of the finite cyclic group are Sidon sets. If
then . Niceness forces ; the alternative pairing would force . Thus the ordered nonzero differences are distinct elements of the nonzero residue classes. Therefore
so
The Erdős-Stone theorem states that if the chromatic number of is , then
If is a bipartite graph with at least one edge, its chromatic number is two, so and therefore
Write
Let be an -free graph on vertices with edges, and choose a uniformly random set of vertices. Its induced subgraph is still -free, and each edge survives with probability . Hence
so . Thus the normalized extremal number is nonincreasing and bounded below by zero, proving that

There are unlisted articles, also show them or only show them.