Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2022 ib Paper 3 16C a Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2022 ib Paper 3 15D c Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2022 ib Paper 3 15D b Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2022 ib Paper 3 15D a Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2022 ib Paper 3 14A b Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2022 ib Paper 3 14A a Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2022 ib Paper 3 13G Solution Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-25
Uniform convergence on compact subsets makes continuous. For every triangle whose closure lies in , uniform convergence on its boundary permits passage through the contour integral:Morera's theorem implies that is holomorphic. If a compact set is surrounded by a finite union of contours at positive distance from , the Cauchy integral formula for derivatives givesThe uniform bound on the surrounding compact set proves that uniformly on .
If had distinct zeros and , choose disjoint small closed discs around them whose boundary contains no zero of . Uniform convergence and Rouché's theorem imply that, for large , has a zero in each disc, contradicting uniqueness of . Thus has at most one zero.
For an example on the unit disc, takeThen , which has no zero in the open disc. In general, Hurwitz's theorem shows that is zero-free exactly when the unique zeros escape every compact subset of :Indeed, an interior accumulation point of is a zero of , while a zero of forces the unique into each of its sufficiently small neighbourhoods.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2022 ib Paper 3 12F b Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2022 ib Paper 3 12F a Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2022 ib Paper 3 11G Solution Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-25
The Banach fixed-point theorem states that a contraction from a nonempty complete metric space to itself has a unique fixed point. Indeed, for ,so the geometric-series estimate makes Cauchy. Completeness gives a limit , continuity gives , andproves uniqueness.
Every solution of lies in . The cosine maps this complete interval into itself and, by the mean value theorem, has Lipschitz constant at most there. It therefore has exactly one real fixed point.
The mean value inequality says that on a convex domain, a uniform derivative bound implies . Equip with the maximum norm and takeFor , elementary cosine bounds giveso . The maximum absolute row sum ofis at most . The mean value inequality makes a contraction on the complete set , so it has a fixed point.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2022 ib Paper 3 10E Solution Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-25
Matrices over a Euclidean domain are equivalent when for invertible matrices , equivalently when one can pass between them by invertible elementary row and column operations.
For a nonzero matrix, move a nonzero entry to the top left and use Euclidean division and row or column operations to replace it by any nonzero remainder. Repeating terminates with an entry dividing every entry; otherwise adding an offending entry into its row would permit one more strict Euclidean reduction. Clear its row and column, then apply induction to the remaining submatrix. This proves equivalence to a diagonal matrix. It is in Smith normal form when, up to units,
Applying these operations over does not change the isomorphism type of the quotient. If the Smith form of is , thenIt is finite exactly when every is nonzero, equivalently , and then
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2022 ib Paper 2 9E Solution Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-25
A Sylow subgroup of a finite group is a subgroup whose order is the largest power of a prime dividing . The Sylow theorems say that such subgroups exist, that every -subgroup lies in one, that all Sylow -subgroups are conjugate, and that their number divides and obeys .
For the last congruence, let one Sylow -subgroup act by conjugation on the set of all Sylow -subgroups. Every orbit other than a fixed point has size divisible by . If is fixed, then . They are Sylow subgroups of this normalizer, so they are conjugate within ; because every element of fixes under conjugation, this forces . Thus there is exactly one fixed point and .
Now let have index with . The coset action gives a homomorphismIts kernel is a normal subgroup of the simple group . It cannot be all of , since the action is transitive and nontrivial, so it is trivial. This would embed into , contrary to . Hence no such subgroup exists.
Suppose finally that a group of order were simple. The Sylow count satisfiesand simplicity excludes , so . Conjugation on these six subgroups gives a nontrivial homomorphism , which simplicity makes injective. Its image lies in , because the composite with the sign homomorphism must be trivial. It would therefore be a subgroup of of index , contradicting the result just proved. Thus
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2022 ib Paper 2 8F Solution Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-25
Let satisfy for every vector . If there is nothing to prove. Otherwise choose with . For every and every real number ,so the hypothesis gives . Taking two values of shows that . Sincewe obtain . Thus one of the two linear functionals is zero.
Sylvester's law of inertia says that, in a suitable basis, every real quadratic form isThe rank is , and the signature is ; both are independent of the chosen basis.
If , its polar form has image contained in , so . If , the two functionals must be independent and, after taking their sum and difference, is a difference of two squares. Hence . If , then . In every case,Conversely, this inequality leaves onlyup to a linear change of coordinates. These factor respectively as , , and . Therefore
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2022 ib Paper 2 7H Solution Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-25
The Lagrange sufficiency theorem says that for a convex differentiable objective and convex differentiable inequality constraints, any feasible point satisfying the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker conditions with nonnegative multipliers is a global minimizer.
WriteThe unconstrained maximizer of on the disc violates , so both boundaries are active at the optimum. Their intersections areand gives the smaller objective.
To certify it, at chooseThenboth multipliers are nonnegative, and complementary slackness holds because both constraints are active. The sufficiency theorem therefore gives
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2022 ib Paper 2 6H b Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2022 ib Paper 2 6H a Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2022 ib Paper 2 5C c Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2022 ib Paper 2 5C b Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2022 ib Paper 2 5C a Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2022 ib Paper 2 4D Solution Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-25
There are unlisted articles, also show them or only show them.