The flat function is an even function, has its unique zero and global minimum at the origin, and approaches the horizontal asymptote as . It decreases for negative and increases for positive , meeting the origin with a horizontal tangent line.
Its derivative is an odd function: off zero, with . It is negative to the left and positive to the right, tends to zero both at the origin and at infinity, and has one negative trough and one positive crest. Indeed away from zero, so the change in slope of occurs once on each side. The exact crest and trough coordinates are not needed for the sketch.
Figure 1.
An even smooth flat function and its odd derivative, both meeting zero with all derivatives zero
. Details.
The curve has and can be written . It is a hyperbola with vertical asymptote and oblique asymptote , crossing the horizontal axis at . It is symmetric under .
On each branch . For , the branch descends from as , passes through , and approaches from above as . The negative branch follows by the central symmetry.
Figure 1.
The two hyperbola branches and their asymptotes, with the nearest point on the positive-horizontal branch marked
. Details.
The domain of a function is , because the denominator vanishes at zero. Near zero, , so is a vertical asymptote, approached with value from the left and from the right. The horizontal asymptotes are as and as .
Moreover,
Both branches define a strictly decreasing monotone function: the left branch lies below , and the right branch is positive. There are no zeros or vertical-axis intercept.
Figure 1.
The decreasing reciprocal-exponential branches with their three asymptotes
. Details.
The tangent has poles at and , so these are vertical asymptotes of . The zeros on the given interval are . Near zero, , so the graph starts with a horizontal tangent line.
Each of its three branches is increasing. Indeed
and the numerator starts at zero with derivative , so it is positive for . The first branch rises from zero to , the middle branch rises from through to , and the last rises from to .
Figure 1.
The three increasing tangent-product branches and their intersections with the right half of the circle
. Details.
Solving for gives with . For large , the square root is , so the two asymptotes are
The curve lies between these lines on the right side and has its nearest point, with vertical tangent, at . As increases it travels from the lower unbounded end through that vertex to the upper unbounded end. The left hyperbola branch is not part of the given curve.
Figure 1.
The parametrized right branch of a hyperbola, its foci, nearest point, and asymptotes
. Details.
Where the original expression is defined, multiplication by gives
Thus the graph repeats with period and has vertical asymptotes
Between consecutive asymptotes the extended cotangent branch decreases from to , since . It passes through and .
It is essential to preserve the domain when simplifying a function. At , the original tangent is undefined. The finite limiting value is zero, so the graph has holes at , rather than actual zeros. The simplified expression extends across those points, but the original one does not.
Figure 1.
The periodic tangent quotient, with vertical asymptotes and the original domain's holes retained
. Details.
This exponential function is positive everywhere, with , as and as . Its derivatives are
It is strictly decreasing overall, with a horizontal stationary inflection point at . A second, nonstationary inflection point occurs at , where . The only horizontal asymptote is toward positive infinity; the graph is not symmetric about the vertical axis.
Figure 1.
The decreasing cubic exponential, its stationary inflection, and its positive horizontal asymptote
. Details.
Within the requested interval, the function is symmetric about because . Its derivative is positive before , zero there, and negative afterwards. The negative second derivative shows that this is a strictly concave function. Consequently its unique maximum is . It tends to at both ends, giving vertical asymptotes and .
Figure 1.
The logarithm of sine between its two vertical asymptotes
. Details.
Rewrite the rational function as . It is undefined at , with the vertical asymptote , and tends to the horizontal asymptote as . At the pole, from the left and from the right.
Its derivative is
vanishing only at . Since and near zero, this is a stationary inflection point, not an extremum. Thus
The graph increases on each side of the vertical asymptote. The left branch lies above , while the right branch lies below it and crosses the origin horizontally.
Figure 1.
The rational-function graph, its two asymptotes, and its stationary inflection at the origin
. Details.
Take for the sketch; changing its sign rotates the picture by . The parametric curve passes through at and through at . As it returns towards the origin, since and . The positive- branch makes a loop in the first quadrant, leaving the origin tangent to the positive axis and returning tangent to the positive axis.
For a more precise sketch, differentiation gives
The loop has its largest at and largest at . Their coordinates are and its reflection in .
The parameter value is excluded. Cancelling the common factor in the sum gives
Thus the asymptote is . As , and ; as , and . The branch approaches the origin from the fourth quadrant as , while connects the other infinite branch to the origin through the second quadrant.
Figure 1.
Folium of Descartes with parameter directions, marked points, and its oblique asymptote
. Details.
This is the folium of Descartes. If , the parametrization degenerates to the origin for every defined parameter value and there is no nontrivial loop.
Differentiate the two powers to locate the stationary point:
For , this is negative before and positive afterwards, so the global minimum is
The curve crosses the horizontal axis at . Its limits are as and from below as , giving the vertical asymptote and horizontal asymptote . These features determine the required sketch.
Figure 1.
Positive branch of the reciprocal curve, with its minimum and axis crossing
. Details.
The graph is the upper branch of the hyperbola . It is symmetric about , positive everywhere, and has its lowest point at . Its derivatives are
so it is strictly convex. Since
its two oblique asymptotes are
Figure 1.
Distance from a moving point to a skew line
. Original plot of , its minimum and its two asymptotes. Details.
For the requested parameter value , the function graph has two branches, symmetric about the vertical axis because is an even function. Its derivatives are
The stationary points are , both local minima and also the lowest points of their respective branches. The function tends to as , so is a vertical asymptote; it also tends to as . The negative branch decreases to and then rises towards the vertical asymptote; the positive branch falls from the vertical asymptote to and then rises.
Figure 1.
Two branches and minima of the function in Question 4 for
. Details.
Introduce the dimensionless quantities and . Then
The Taylor series at gives
Thus the initial slope is , as for free fall. At late times,
The oblique asymptote is , approached from below. Direct differentiation gives
The speed increases monotonically with decreasing slope, from towards . It does not reach a terminal velocity in this drag-free model. Without mass accumulation, and still without drag, a drop released from rest has : its acceleration remains , whereas the growing drop continually shares its momentum with newly acquired material.
Figure 1.
Growing-droplet speed, its early and late limits, and an explicitly assumed quadratic drag example
. Details.
Assume a real, time-independent potential with the same zero asymptote on both sides, so is the same incident and transmitted wave number. For unit incoming amplitudes,
Multiplying the two Schrödinger equations crosswise and subtracting shows that the Wronskian is constant. Its two asymptotic values are and , hence .
For a real potential the probability current is conserved, giving . Therefore
The reflection amplitudes can have different phases. Reality or self-adjointness is essential for the reflection-probability conclusion: a complex absorbing potential need not have equal left and right reflectances. Equal asymptotic speeds are also used in identifying transmission with the squared amplitude.