Bare coupling 2026-10-14
A bare coupling is an interaction coefficient in a regulated action. It is related to a renormalized coupling through counterterms and any required powers of the renormalization scale. For quartic scalar theory in dimensions, its mass dimension is , and . At fixed regulator, changing while leaving the theory unchanged keeps fixed; the corresponding change of defines its renormalization-group beta function.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2002 iii Paper 65 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
The renormalization-group beta function isAt one-loop accuracy, integrating givesFor a positive weak coupling and , the coupling increases toward the ultraviolet and decreases toward the infrared. Extrapolation predicts a Landau pole at , where the weak-coupling approximation fails. For , the positive coupling decreases toward zero as : this is asymptotic freedom. Toward the infrared it instead grows, so perturbation theory eventually fails. The zero coupling is a fixed point. If negative couplings are allowed mathematically, their direction of motion still satisfies , but the side on which the pole occurs reverses: for example approaches zero from below in the ultraviolet. Negative quartic coupling does not give a stable scalar potential.
For the loop calculation use , , and the PDF's vertex normalization . A Feynman parameter combines the denominators. Shift the Euclidean loop momentum to , and put . The regulated integral without the vertex prefactor isUsing Schwinger parameterization, , and the momentum Gaussian integral givesFor , , while the other factors have finite limits. Thus the massive scalar bubble pole in four dimensions isThis pole is independent of external momentum and mass and hence is canceled by a local quartic counterterm. There are three channels, corresponding to the three pairings of four external momenta. Their poles add, and a counterterm vertex cancels the sum whenThis is the total counterterm for the three four-point diagrams specified here. The minimal subtraction scheme removes their poles only. The one-loop tadpole is momentum independent and requires a mass counterterm, but does not produce one-loop wave-function renormalization; that is why it does not alter this one-loop coupling calculation.
The dimensionful bare coupling is thereforeIts independence of givesPutting , the finite coefficient of is . ThusThis is the one-loop quartic scalar beta function, positive for nonzero weak real coupling. The factors would look different with a regulator , but the four-dimensional beta function is unchanged. For massless theory take nonexceptional external momentum, or an infrared regulator, so an infrared singularity is not confused with the ultraviolet pole.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 iii Paper 52 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Set and . The kinetic term gives the scalar mass dimension , so the quartic bare coupling has mass dimension . A dimensionless renormalized coupling therefore comes with the factor .
The order- proper four-point corrections are precisely the three bubble diagrams in the diagram plate, with external partitions . Each carries a symmetry factor one half. Its two-propagator integral has logarithmic ultraviolet divergence in four dimensions, represented in dimensional regularization by a simple pole at . That pole's residue is independent of external momenta, so a local quartic counterterm cancels it. The three channels add, rather than describing three separate couplings. The two-point tadpole has no momentum dependence, so it does not supply a one-loop field-normalization correction to the four-point coupling. The first momentum-dependent field correction contributes to this relation only at higher order.
With the supplied residue , the subtraction relation consequently readsA possible scheme-dependent finite subtraction does not change the displayed four-dimensional one-loop coefficient. Keep the regulator and bare coupling fixed while varying the renormalization scale, and define . Differentiation givesTo retain all quadratic terms, put . The engineering term times the pole factor contributes , and the remaining quadratic coefficient is . It vanishes only when . ThusDropping the product of the engineering term and pole factor would give the wrong sign for the loop term.
At , separation of the one-loop renormalization-group flow givesThereforeThis is the solution of the truncated one-loop equation, not an exact all-orders running law. It applies while the coupling remains sufficiently weak; its Landau pole is at for .
A renormalization-group fixed point has . For and a small perturbation , linearization givesThus means attraction as , or ultraviolet stability; means attraction as , or infrared stability. If the derivative vanishes, higher terms decide marginal stability. These statements concern the specified coupling direction; other couplings or the mass can be relevant even when this direction is stable.
For , the quadratic renormalization-group beta function has zeros and . At the nonzero zero,ConsequentlyThis is the weak-coupling Wilson-Fisher fixed point, perturbatively controlled near four dimensions. Reaching its full critical limit also requires tuning the mass, the thermal relevant direction at the Wilson-Fisher fixed point.
At , this nonzero fixed point merges with the Gaussian fixed point. Although the derivative at zero vanishes, for a positive weak coupling, so the running solution tends to zero logarithmically toward the infrared. The four-dimensional critical long-distance limit is Gaussian: the quartic interaction is marginally irrelevant, rather than flowing to a nonzero weakly interacting infrared fixed point. This is the Gaussian infrared limit of positive four-dimensional quartic coupling. It is not ultraviolet asymptotic freedom; the positive coupling grows in the ultraviolet. Nor does it say a massive theory has no interactions at finite energy: the critical or massless scaling regime is the one described by this limiting flow. Extrapolating the one-loop law to arbitrarily high cutoff at fixed positive low-energy coupling encounters its Landau pole; avoiding that pole as the cutoff is removed forces the perturbative coupling toward zero. This motivates the usual triviality conclusion, but the one-loop calculation alone is not a nonperturbative theorem excluding all possible strongly coupled ultraviolet completions.