Chi-squared Chernoff lower-tail bound 2026-10-06
For and , apply the Chernoff bound to using . Optimization at proves the displayed estimate. It remains useful when the additive lower threshold in the chi-squared concentration inequality is nonpositive. For , choosing gives a tail at most because .
For with independent standard Gaussian rows in dimension , combine a constant-radius sphere metric net, the quadratic form net bound, the chi-squared concentration inequality, and a union bound. This gives for a numerical . Taking larger than a constant times gives exponential decay in . The subspace is fixed, so no union over supports is needed.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2014 iii Paper 30 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
The ordinary column Gram matrix is . Use the normalized empirical Gram matrixso that standard Gaussian entries give . This is the normalization needed for concentration around .
The restricted isometry property of order with constant means that the normalized map approximately preserves the Euclidean norm of all vectors with at most nonzero coordinates:Equivalently, every principal block with satisfies . The least such is its restricted isometry constant. In the unnormalized definition apply this property to itself.
For a standard normal variable , direct Gaussian integration gives for . Independence therefore yields the moment-generating function of a chi-squared distribution, centred here at its mean:The inequality follows from . For , the Chernoff bound with givesAt the trivial probability bound suffices. This proves the requested bound, with a stronger prefactor one.
For the lower tail, gives for . Taking yields . Combining both tails gives the useful chi-squared concentration inequalityFor set . A direct calculation showsThus the exponent is at least , provingThe same threshold bounds the two-sided tail.
Finally fix a deterministic and put . If , independence of the Gaussian rows gives independently. ThereforeThe two-sided bound just proved suppliesFor the quadratic form is deterministically zero; the strict inequality makes the formula valid in that case too. When , replacing the threshold by gives an absolute bound independent of . In particular every fixed such direction concentrates at rate for a fixed confidence level. The restricted isometry property requires a simultaneous statement over sparse directions; this fixed-direction calculation alone is not that stronger assertion.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 iii Paper 36 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
The relevant fixed coordinate subspace is . Let be the first columns of and letThe Gaussian empirical Gram matrix is the empirical second moment with the known mean zero; no subtraction of an estimated mean is involved. For , the ratio under consideration is . Since is a real symmetric matrix, the finite-dimensional spectral theorem givesIndeed, diagonalizing bounds every unit-vector quadratic form by the largest absolute eigenvalue, and a corresponding unit eigenvector attains the bound.
We first construct a unit sphere net from ball covering. Enlarge the numerical covering constant, if necessary, to . Cover the unit ball in with at most balls of radius at most . For each such ball meeting the unit sphere, choose a point of the sphere in it and discard the others. These selected points form a metric net of the unit sphere with radius : any two points in one covering ball have distance at most . This argument ensures that the net points have unit length even if the original covering centers did not.
Take and put , so . For unit vectors with ,Taking a net point for every unit and then a supremum proves the quadratic form net boundIt follows that
Fix . The rows of are independent vectors of independent random variables with the standard normal distribution, and . Their scalar products with are therefore independent variables , soUse the supplied chi-squared concentration inequality with . Its threshold isConsequently . The union bound gives the stronger fixed-subspace estimateThis is Gaussian Gram matrix concentration on a fixed subspace.
Since , we have . Under ,Choose the numerical constant . Then the parenthesis is at least one, so is a valid choice, andThe covering factor is only because the coordinate subspace is fixed. The ambient dimension enters through the assumed sample-size bound.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 210 2 c Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Put and . Use the quadratic scan statistic and reject when . Under the null hypothesis, each has the chi-squared distribution with degrees of freedom. The chi-squared concentration inequality gives , by the union bound. Since , the proposed Type I error is at most .
For the true set , has the same chi-squared distribution. We need a lower-tail bound that remains positive even when is close to one. Set . The chi-squared Chernoff lower-tail bound gives : indeed for . To verify this last inequality, its derivative is ; the expression in parentheses is strictly concave, starts at zero, and changes sign once, so the minimum occurs at an endpoint, where the inequality holds.
The function is convex with , so on this interval. Consequently implies . Failure to reject then requires , giving Type II error at most , uniformly in . An explicit, deliberately conservative answer isThe sharp constant is unnecessary; the detection scale is .
Quadratic scan statistic 2026-10-06
A quadratic scan statistic maximizes a directional empirical second moment over candidate unit vectors. For a Gaussian random vector sample with a rank-one covariance spike in one of those directions, the matching statistic has its scale multiplied by the spike's eigenvalue. A chi-squared concentration inequality controls each direction.