Awarded in equal thirds to Steven Chu, Claude Cohen-Tannoudji and William D. Phillips for developing methods to cool and trap chemical atoms using lasers.[ref]
Polarization-gradient cooling Created 2026-10-14 Updated 2026-10-18
Jean Dalibard and Claude Cohen-Tannoudji distinguish cooling by changing elliptical polarization from cooling by rotating linear polarization. The hill picture below concerns the former.[ref]
The 1988 experiment loaded sodium optical molasses from a slowed atomic beam. After stopping loading, a shutter extinguished the six cooling beams. Released atoms crossed a lower probe; a photomultiplier recorded fluorescence versus arrival time. Calculations integrated the measured initial cloud distribution and an assumed three-dimensional Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution, including gravity and detection geometry. The minimum was , versus the Doppler cooling limit.[ref]
Probe separation, probe intensity, cloud density and shutter timing were varied. Fountain-height, horizontal-spreading and release/recapture measurements also gave below-limit results. Geometry remained an uncertainty; agreement among complementary thermometers made a detector artifact less plausible. These measured released atoms, rather than an in-situ velocity distribution.[ref]
Steven Chu's account connects the explanation to optical pumping, Stark effect shifts and spatially changing electromagnetic polarization; Claude Cohen-Tannoudji's lecture separates this mechanism from subrecoil schemes. Their lectures and William D. Phillips's describe complementary experimental and theoretical routes.[ref][ref]