A family is equicontinuous if for every and there is a neighborhood of such that
for every and every . The Arzelà-Ascoli theorem says that, for a compact Hausdorff space , a subset of has compact closure in the uniform norm if and only if it is equicontinuous and pointwise bounded. On compact , equicontinuity and pointwise boundedness together imply uniform boundedness.
For necessity, a compact closure is totally bounded. Given , choose a finite -net . The finitely many continuous functions are simultaneously continuous near each point, and comparison with a nearby proves equicontinuity of the whole family. Evaluation at any fixed point is a continuous map or , so compactness also gives pointwise boundedness.
Conversely, equicontinuity gives, around each , a neighborhood on which every oscillates by less than . Compactness supplies a finite such cover with selected points . Pointwise boundedness makes the set of vectors
a bounded subset of a finite-dimensional normed vector space, so it has a finite -net. Choose one function of for every nonempty cell of this net. If two functions have evaluation vectors in the same cell, then comparison at a selected and the two oscillation bounds show that their uniform distance is less than . Thus is totally bounded. Since is a Banach space, its closure is complete; a complete totally bounded metric space is compact, proving the theorem.
A subset of a metric space is nowhere dense when the interior of its closure is empty. One form of the Baire category theorem says that a nonempty complete metric space cannot be a countable union of nowhere dense closed sets; equivalently, a countable intersection of dense open sets is dense.
Fix and work in the complete interval . For define the closed set
The sets are closed by the continuity of , and the assumed pointwise convergence gives . The Baire category theorem therefore gives an and a nonempty open interval contained in .
The intervals overlap once , which holds for every sufficiently large natural number . Their union consequently contains a half-line. Every sufficiently large can therefore be written as with and , and then . Since was arbitrary, as .
It suffices by part a to treat a nondecreasing right-continuous integrator, whose increments define a finite Lebesgue–Stieltjes measure on . Let be the left-endpoint step approximation on the dyadic intervals. The displayed sum is exactly
The continuous function is uniformly continuous on the compact interval, so . Therefore
Apply this separately to and to obtain the asserted Lebesgue-Stieltjes integral limit.
The events decrease, and an open path from reaches every exactly when the open cluster of is infinite. Therefore continuity from above of a measure gives
Each depends on finitely many sites, so is a polynomial and hence continuous. Given , choose with . For , monotonicity and the finite-event continuity yield
Thus from the right.
A problem is well posed in the sense of Hadamard when a solution exists for every admissible datum, is unique, and depends continuously on the datum. It is ill posed if any one of these three properties fails.
For the inverse problem , a regularization of an inverse problem is a family of bounded maps that approximate the generally unbounded Moore–Penrose inverse of an operator . It is a convergent regularization of an inverse problem if there is a parameter rule such that
as for every .
The following four assumptions are sufficient, with statements understood for -almost every and every :
The first two assumptions give . The last two allow the dominated convergence theorem to prove continuity of the normalized posterior density, which is equivalent to continuity in total variation distance.
The noise has the product Laplace distribution density
which is normalized because . By translation invariance of Lebesgue measure, the conditional law of has density
Hence an associated likelihood function is
The map is measurable because is measurable and vector subtraction is continuous. Composition with the continuous norm and exponential functions proves that is jointly measurable.
If , the same upper-half-plane contour calculation gives
If , the pole lies below the real integration contour. Closing upward encloses no pole, so Jordan lemma and the Cauchy integral theorem give
Hence at a real point the upper and lower boundary values satisfy
Thus crossing from the upper half-plane to the lower half-plane produces the negative of this jump.
An analytic continuation must be holomorphic, hence continuous, across every point where it is defined. The undeformed real-axis formula for has the nonzero jump above, while the continuation constructed in part (c) retains below the axis. Therefore cannot be the analytic continuation of .
Since is simply connected, write
for an entire function . If were bounded above, then
would be bounded, so the Liouville theorem would make constant. Its derivative would then vanish, whence and would be constant. Applying the same argument to rules out a lower bound. Thus a nonconstant is unbounded both above and below.
Given any , choose with
The restriction of to the line segment from to is continuous, so the intermediate value theorem supplies a point on that segment where . Therefore
This proves the surjectivity of a nonconstant entire harmonic function.
A family of continuous functions on a compact space is equicontinuous if, for every and every , there is a neighbourhood of such that for every in and every in . The Arzelà-Ascoli theorem says that has compact closure in with the uniform norm if and only if it is equicontinuous and pointwise bounded.
Apply Arzelà-Ascoli theorem on . Pointwise boundedness and equicontinuity give a subsequence converging uniformly there. Successively extract subsequences for , and take the diagonal subsequence. It converges uniformly on every closed bounded interval. Its limits on nested intervals agree, so they define on the real numbers; the locally uniform limit of continuous functions is continuous.
Fix and . Since is compact in the uniform norm, choose a finite -net . By continuity, there is a neighbourhood of on which for every . For in , choose with . The triangle inequality gives on , uniformly in . Thus is equicontinuous.
A locally compact Hausdorff space is regular. Cover by finitely many open sets whose compact closures lie in ; their union satisfies , with compact. The compact Hausdorff space is normal, so the Urysohn lemma gives a continuous function equal to on and on . Extend by zero outside . The boundary values make the extension continuous, and its support is a compact subset of .
For the sum :
  • In case (a), yes. If were differentiable at , then would be differentiable there, contrary to the hypothesis.
  • In case (b), no. Take
    Both are continuous and nondifferentiable at , but is differentiable.
For the product , the answer is no in both cases:
  • For case (a), take and . Then is differentiable at , is not, but
    has derivative at .
  • For case (b), take . Neither factor is differentiable at , whereas
    is differentiable.
Every displayed and is a continuous function and is nonzero at points arbitrarily close to , so the extra condition in the question is satisfied.
An by matrix has matrix rank exactly when at least one of its by minors has nonzero determinant. For each multi-index , the set
is open in the vector space of all real by matrices, because the determinant is continuous. Their union is , so is itself open in . It therefore inherits the standard smooth manifold structure and has dimension . This is the full-row-rank matrix manifold.
On the unit ball, part 1 controls the norm. Outside it, , so
Hence , proving that the embedding is continuous.
For compactness, let be bounded in . On each ball, it is bounded in , so the Rellich-Kondrachov compactness theorem gives a subsequence convergent in local . The tail estimate
is uniform in and tends to zero as . A diagonal argument therefore gives convergence in all of . This is the compact embedding of a confining-potential energy space.
Let contain the support of . Choose a cutoff function that equals one near . It makes
well-defined, and differentiating the parameter under the pairing gives
Thus the Fourier transform of a compactly supported distribution is a smooth function. Since a compactly supported distribution has finite order, some and satisfy
Applying this estimate to the exponential yields .
Now take , multiply by a cutoff function supported in and equal to one near , and regard the result as an element of . Choose so large that
is Lebesgue integrable. The inverse Fourier transform is a bounded continuous function, and the Fourier transform of a derivative gives
as a distributional identity. This is the Bessel potential proof of the structure theorem for compactly supported distributions.
The function itself need not have compact support. Choose another cutoff equal to one near . Then . Repeatedly using
expresses as a finite sum , where every coefficient is continuous and compactly supported in .
Applying the distributional Leibniz rule twice gives
Eliminating the middle term proves
Choose with . Parts i and ii and the identity just proved, with and , yield
Thus explicit continuous functions of compact support are
Changing variables gives
The average of a continuous function over tends to as . The two terms therefore tend to and , proving the stated limit.
Fix a continuous function and . By the Weierstrass approximation theorem, choose a polynomial such that
For every , exactness gives . Positivity of the quadrature weights and exactness on the constant polynomial give
Consequently
Since is arbitrary, . This is the convergence of positive quadrature rules.