A metric space is path-connected if every pair can be joined by a path: a continuous map with and .
The path must remain in , including at its endpoints.
For , the number avoids the nonpositive real axis. Define the branch of the complex logarithm by
Here the principal argument is selected as a continuous map on that slit domain, so this is a holomorphic function, with derivative and . For example, locally writing gives , verifying the complex derivative. The normalization also makes this branch of the complex logarithm unique: any two continuous choices differ by a constant integer multiple of on the connected slit domain, and their values at agree.
To evaluate the corresponding analytic branch of a square root on the unit circle, factor
For , we have and . Thus this factorization already uses the selected principal argument, with no hidden change by . It follows that
Halving this expression and applying the exponential function gives
Since , the desired branch value is
For instance, gives , a quick check that the sign agrees with the normalization.
A metric space is a complete metric space if every Cauchy sequence in converges to a point of . Explicitly, the hypothesis is
and the conclusion is that some satisfies .
It is a connected space if there are no disjoint nonempty open subsets of with . Here openness refers to the metric topology of .
It is a path-connected space if, for every , there is a continuous map with and . Such a map is a path. Every path-connected space is a connected space: a separation would pull back along a path joining its two sides to a separation of the interval .
Both properties are preserved by a continuous map.
For sequential compactness, take any sequence in and choose with . If is sequentially compact, some subsequence satisfies . By continuity, . Hence is a sequentially compact space.
For connectedness, suppose instead that is a separation into disjoint nonempty relatively open sets. Then and are disjoint nonempty open sets of whose union is , contradicting connectedness. Therefore is a connected space.
Take distinct classes . The points are not related by , so by the defining negation there is a Hausdorff space and a continuous map with . Choose disjoint open neighborhoods and of those two values. Their inverse images and are disjoint open subsets of and are saturated by part (ii).
Hence and , making and open in the quotient topology. They contain the chosen classes and are disjoint: an equivalence class meeting both would contradict saturation and . Thus is Hausdorff. This quotient is the Hausdorff reflection by continuous maps; every continuous map from to a Hausdorff space factors uniquely through it.
For each continuous map to a Hausdorff target, equality of its values is reflexive, symmetric and transitive. The relation requires all these equalities simultaneously. Explicitly, gives reflexivity; implies ; and gives . These arguments apply to every map in the defining family, proving is an equivalence relation.
The claim is false for an arbitrary codomain . Let with its usual topology, let be the Sierpiński space with open sets , and define , for . This is a continuous map: the only nontrivial open-set preimage is , which is relatively open in .
The sets are nonempty, nested and compact. But
Thus the extra generality in the printed codomain changes the assertion materially. This is the failure of nested compact image intersection without closed fibers.
If the codomain is a T1 space, the continuous images of nested compact intersections theorem does give the desired equality. The forward inclusion holds for every map. For the reverse, take and set . The fibers are closed by continuity and the T1 property, so the are nested nonempty closed subsets of the compact set . The finite intersection property gives , with . It is enough that these particular fibers be closed in ; a Hausdorff codomain, as in the native self-map formulation, is a familiar sufficient assumption.
A subset is connected if its subspace topology admits no separation into two disjoint nonempty relatively open subsets. Equivalently, every continuous map , with the target discrete, is constant: a nonconstant map gives the separation by its two fibers, and a separation defines such a map.
A continuous map is one for which is open in whenever is open in . This defines continuity using the two topologies, without a metric or a coordinate description.
A basis of a topology is a collection of open sets such that every open set is a union of members of . Equivalently, for every open and there is with .
A map is continuous exactly when is open in for every basic set of . Necessity follows from the definition of a continuous map. For sufficiency, express an arbitrary open set as a union of basic sets and use preservation of unions by inverse images.
The image is compact: pull any open cover back by the continuous map, use a finite subcover of , then map forward. For a general topological target, closedness is not guaranteed; a continuous image into the indiscrete two-point space can be a nonclosed singleton. No connectedness assertion follows merely from compactness of .
If is metric, is compact, therefore closed in , bounded and totally bounded. It is also complete in its induced metric and sequentially compact. For the latter properties, compact metric spaces have a convergent subsequence of every sequence; a Cauchy sequence with one convergent subsequence converges to that same limit. Total boundedness follows by selecting finitely many balls of each prescribed radius. These are properties of the image itself, irrespective of whether is complete.
A homotopy from to is a continuous map with and for every . A covering map is a surjective continuous map for which every has an open neighborhood whose inverse image is a disjoint union of open sets, each mapped homeomorphically onto . A lift of is a continuous map satisfying .
The path lifting theorem says that a path and a point determine a unique path with and .
On there is a continuous branch of the complex argument, taking values in . If avoids , set . Then the explicit homotopy
starts at and ends at the constant map . It is continuous because the chosen argument branch is continuous on the whole image. More generally, a map omitting any is null-homotopic: apply the formula to and multiply the resulting homotopy by .
For the based injective map, use the standard covering map . Lift the path on to a real-valued path with . Since , its endpoint is an integer. On , is injective: equality implies , then by injectivity, and hence in this half-open interval. A continuous injective real-valued function on an interval is strictly monotone.
If is increasing, . It cannot be at least , because the intermediate value theorem would produce with , giving while . Thus . If is decreasing, the same reasoning gives . Now define
At and this has the same value for every , since is an integer. Therefore the formula descends continuously from to . At it is ; at it is . Hence is homotopic to the identity or to complex conjugation, with degree or . This is the key property of an injective self-map of a circle.
Finally, let be any continuous injective circle self-map. Normalize it to , which is injective and fixes . If were not surjective, it would omit some circle point, so the explicit missing-point construction would make null-homotopic. Multiplying this homotopy by would make null-homotopic too. But is homotopic to the identity or conjugation, neither of which is null-homotopic by the permitted fact. This contradiction proves every continuous injective circle self-map is surjective. The lifting argument did not assume surjectivity, so the reasoning is not circular.
Let be the inclusion map and the retraction. Since is contractible, choose a contraction of a topological space
The function composition
is a continuous map. Its endpoints satisfy
Consequently is a homotopy from the identity map of to a constant function. This proves
The contracting point of need not belong to : applying the retraction sends it to the contracting point of . This is the retract of a contractible space principle.
Yes. Take , the circle, and . The constant function is a continuous map and satisfies , so is a retract of .
However, their fundamental groups are
A homotopy equivalence between path-connected spaces induces a group isomorphism of their fundamental groups, allowing the usual change of base point. The infinite cyclic group is not the trivial group. Therefore a retract need not have the homotopy type of its ambient space.
Two continuous maps are homotopic if there is a continuous map
Here the Cartesian product has the product topology. Such an is a homotopy, written .
The topological spaces are homotopy equivalent if there are continuous maps and such that
Each is then a homotopy inverse of the other.
For with its subspace topology with inclusion map , a homotopy retract, in the course's convention, is a continuous map with
Thus is an actual retraction, and give a homotopy equivalence. Requiring the latter homotopy to fix pointwise at all times gives the stronger condition of a deformation retraction as used in this wiki. The course's definition of homotopy retract requires no such restriction on that homotopy.
Identify the bottom with ; its natural map is a topological embedding. To verify this directly, an open subset gives the saturated open subset of the space before taking the quotient topology; its image is open in and meets the bottom in .
Suppose first that there is a retraction . Define the continuous map
Then
is a homotopy with and . Hence .
Conversely, suppose a continuous map has . Reverse the parameter if necessary to choose a homotopy with and . Set
At the glued end, , exactly the value prescribed at . The universal property of the quotient topology therefore gives a continuous map . At the bottom, , proving that is a retraction. We have established the mapping-cylinder bottom retraction criterion:
Define
The two formulas agree on the attached end, so the universal property of the quotient topology makes a continuous map. Also .
Slide each cylinder point towards its attached end using
At these formulas both give , so they define a homotopy on the mapping cylinder. For continuity, the product of a quotient map with the unit interval is a quotient map; the formulas before taking the quotient topology are continuous maps and agree on every identified pair. Thus
Moreover stays fixed throughout. We have obtained the stronger conclusion
In particular is the requested homotopy retract.
Write
for the quotient map defining the mapping cylinder, and put . Since the equivalence relation only attaches points at height to , distinct points at height remain distinct. Thus is an injective continuous map.
Define the homotopy
It is a continuous map, with and . Hence
Even if identifies many points, the free end of the mapping cylinder retains a separate copy of every point of .