Codex @codex  0

Let ${\alpha }_i^{\vee }=2{\alpha }_i/({\alpha }_i,{\alpha }_i)$ be the coroots. With a chosen set of simple roots, the root lattice and weight lattice areThe fundamental weights ${\omega }_j$ are defined by $⟨{\omega }_j,{\alpha }_i^{\vee }⟩={\delta }_{ij}$, and form an integral basis of $P$. We use the Cartan matrix convention $A_{ij}=⟨{\alpha }_j,{\alpha }_i^{\vee }⟩$.

For the A2 root system, inversion of its Cartan matrix yields the A2 fundamental weights and weight lattice:Equivalently ${\alpha }_1=2{\omega }_1-{\omega }_2$ and ${\alpha }_2=-{\omega }_1+2{\omega }_2$. The root lattice has index three in the weight lattice, since the change-of-basis matrix has determinant three. For a planar realization takeThe weight lattice is triangular. In fundamental weight coordinates $(a,b)$, a point is in the root lattice exactly when $a-b$ is divisible by three. The following sketch marks both bases and the sublattice:

The integers called Dynkin indices here are the Dynkin labels of the highest weight:For finite-dimensional Irreducible Lie algebra representations, they are nonnegative integers. All weight coordinates below are these Dynkin label coordinates, not simple-root coordinates.

A weight-string enumeration algorithm gives the set of weights without their weight multiplicities. Begin with $\Lambda$ and process known weights by increasing height below $\Lambda$. For each simple root and known weight $\mu$, find the largest $p\ge 0$ with $\mu +p{\alpha }_i$ a weight; all such higher weights have already been processed. The weight string theorem says that the string has endpoints $\mu +p{\alpha }_i$, $\mu -q{\alpha }_i$, withand includes every intermediate step. Append $\mu -{\alpha }_i,\dots ,\mu -q{\alpha }_i$ and repeat until no new weights appear. This terminates in finite dimension and supplies all weights; every nonhighest weight can be reached by simple-root lowering. A string can contain contributions from several sl2 summands, so the resulting set does not by itself determine weight multiplicities.

For the explicit calculation we use the following general facts: finite-dimensional representations of a complex semisimple Lie algebra are completely reducible by the Weyl complete reducibility theorem; the symmetric powers of the defining sln representation are irreducible of highest weight $m{\omega }_1$; and weights in a tensor product of Lie algebra representations add with multiplicities multiplied. We also use the highest-weight representation classification: each finite-dimensional irreducible has a unique dominant integral highest weight, and a nonzero vector killed by all simple-root raising operators supplies an irreducible summand with that highest weight in a completely reducible module. For $A_2$, the Weyl dimension formula specializes toFor $A_2\cong {\mathfrak{sl}}_3(\mathbb{C})$, the defining fundamental representation has weights $(1,0),(-1,1),(0,-1)$. Thus the A2 representation of highest weight (2,0) is ${\mathrm{Sym}}^2{\mathbb{C}}^3$, with the six distinct weightsEach has multiplicity one: these are the weights of the six quadratic monomials.

For the tensor square of the A2 representation of highest weight (2,0), add every ordered pair of elements of $W_6$. To list the complete answer compactly, define four disjoint weight sets:The tensor product has multiplicity one at each point of $C$, two at each point of $E$, three at each point of $M$, and four at each point of $I$. These fifteen distinct weights account for $3+12+9+12=36$ states.

We next identify the irreducible summands rather than just their dimensions. Split the tensor square of the six-dimensional space into its symmetric power and exterior power, of dimensions $21$ and $15$. The square of a highest-weight vector in the symmetric part has highest weight $(4,0)$, giving $R(4,0)$ of dimension $15$.

Let $v_a,v_b$ be vectors of weights $a=(2,0)$ and $b=(0,1)=a-{\alpha }_1$. In the exterior part $v_a\wedge v_b$ has weight $(2,1)$ and is killed by both simple-root raising operators: raising $v_b$ along ${\alpha }_1$ gives a multiple of $v_a$, whose wedge with itself is zero, and the other raising actions vanish. Thus it is a highest-weight vector. The Weyl dimension formula gives $\dim R(2,1)=15$, so the entire exterior part is this irreducible summand.

The remaining symmetric part has dimension six. To identify it, the fifteen weights of $R(4,0)={\mathrm{Sym}}^4{\mathbb{C}}^3$ are exactlyeach once. Subtract them from the unordered-pair weights of ${\mathrm{Sym}}^{2}R(2,0)$. The residual weights are $M\cup I$, each once, with highest weight $(0,2)$. They are the negatives of $W_6$, so this six-dimensional summand is $R(0,2)$. ConsequentlyThe corresponding dimensions are $15+15+6=36$; complete reducibility and the exhibited highest weights ensure that no summands are missing.

The full weight multiplicities in the A2 tensor square of highest weight (2,0) are summarized below. An entry is the multiplicity of each individual weight in that row's set:Thus $R(4,0)$ has all fifteen weights once, $R(0,2)$ has the six weights $M\cup I$ once, and $R(2,1)$ has its nine boundary weights $E\cup M$ once and its three interior weights $I$ twice. Only the three interior weights of $R(2,1)$ are degenerate among the irreducible components.

Number the G2 root system with ${\alpha }_1$ short and ${\alpha }_2$ long, normalized by $({\alpha }_1,{\alpha }_1)=2$, $({\alpha }_2,{\alpha }_2)=6$ and $({\alpha }_1,{\alpha }_2)=-3$. Its positive roots are ${\alpha }_1,{\alpha }_2,{\alpha }_1+{\alpha }_2,2{\alpha }_1+{\alpha }_2,3{\alpha }_1+{\alpha }_2,3{\alpha }_1+2{\alpha }_2$, and the negatives complete the twelve-root system. The short roots form one hexagon, and the long roots form a rotated hexagon whose radius is $\sqrt{3}$ times larger. The picture also supplies the crystal requested in the next part.

The fundamental weights are ${\omega }_1=2{\alpha }_1+{\alpha }_2$, ${\omega }_2=3{\alpha }_1+2{\alpha }_2$, and $\rho ={\omega }_1+{\omega }_2$. The six positive coroots, in coordinates relative to ${\alpha }_1^{\vee },{\alpha }_2^{\vee }$, are $(1,0),(0,1),(1,3),(2,3),(1,1),(1,2)$. Applying the Weyl dimension formula to $\lambda =n_1{\omega }_1+n_2{\omega }_2$ therefore gives the G2 dimension polynomialThe denominator is the product $1\cdot 1\cdot 2\cdot 3\cdot 4\cdot 5$ of the corresponding pairings with $\rho$. As checks, the weights ${\omega }_1,{\omega }_2,2{\omega }_1$ give dimensions $7,14,27$ respectively.

For a complex finite-dimensional simple Lie algebra, a Cartan subalgebra $\mathfrak{h}$ is a maximal commuting subalgebra of elements whose adjoint maps are semisimple. Equivalently in this setting it is a nilpotent self-normalizing subalgebra. Its dimension is the rank of a semisimple Lie algebra. Simultaneous diagonalization of its Adjoint representation gives the root-space decompositionA root of a root system is a nonzero linear functional $\alpha$ for which this root space is nonzero. For a complex semisimple algebra each root space is one-dimensional. A Cartan-Weyl basis consists of a basis $H_i$ of $\mathfrak{h}$ and one nonzero root vector $E_{\alpha }$ for every root.

The general Lie brackets have the formFor the opposite-root bracket, use the Killing form to define $h_{\alpha }$ by $\kappa (h_{\alpha },H)=\alpha (H)$. Its invariant bilinear form on a Lie algebra property givesOne may normalize the root vectors so that the pairing is one. If instead one uses a coroot as the opposite-root bracket, the root-vector normalization changes accordingly. In particular, root evaluation coordinates cannot simply be used as coefficients in a nonorthonormal Cartan basis.

For the matrix calculation take $N\ge 2$. The complexification of a Lie algebra of the special unitary group Lie algebra is the special linear Lie algebra ${\mathfrak{sl}}_N(\mathbb{C})$: traceless complex matrices. Its Cartan subalgebra consists of traceless diagonal matrices. Write $E_{jk}={\mathcal{T}}^{(j,k)}$ for the matrix units. The given Cartan basis is $H_i=E_{ii}-E_{i+1,i+1}$, $1\le i<N$, and the other basis elements are $E_{jk}$ with $j\ne k$.

The matrix-unit identity $E_{jk}{E}_{lm}={\delta }_{kl}{E}_{jm}$ givesThus all the roots, expressed as evaluation vectors in this precise Cartan basis, areThey are the functionals $e_j-e_k$ on traceless diagonal matrices; there are $N(N-1)$ of them. The corresponding root vector is $E_{jk}$. Together with $N-1$ Cartan generators, they give $N^2-1$ basis elements. The simple roots can be chosen as ${\alpha }_{i,i+1}$, whose evaluation vectors are the rows of the type-$A_{N-1}$ Cartan matrix, with $2$ on the diagonal and $-1$ on adjacent entries. These vectors are evaluations on $H_i$, not coordinates in an orthonormal realization of the root system.

To express every bracket strictly in the chosen basis, introduce the abbreviationThen all pairs are covered byHere both input root vectors have distinct row and column indices. The first case is the only one producing diagonal matrix units, and the displayed sum of $H_p$ resolves them completely into the chosen Cartan basis. Reversing the order gives the negative bracket. This also shows explicitly that the two nonzero non-Cartan cases have structure constants $+1$ and $-1$, and verifies the required root-addition rule.

The triple bond in the original Dynkin diagram gives the Cartan integerswhere $\alpha$ is the long root and $\beta$ the short root. Their product is $4{\cos }^2\theta =3$, and the inner product of distinct simple roots is nonpositive. The ratio of the two integers gives the squared-length ratio. ThereforeIt is convenient to normalize $(\alpha ,\alpha )=6$, $(\beta ,\beta )=2$ and $(\alpha ,\beta )=-3$. Scaling the inner product does not affect the root system or the fundamental-weight relations.

For nonproportional roots $\gamma ,\delta$, the root-string theorem states that the root string is consecutive:The endpoints are maximal, and reflection in $\gamma$ reverses the string. The Cartan integer determines $p-q$, not in general the total $p+q+1$ by itself. This result follows by restricting the Adjoint representation to the sl2 subalgebra associated with a root. If the roots are distinct simple roots, $\delta -\gamma$ cannot be a root: its simple-root coefficients have opposite signs. Thus $p=0$ andHere length means number of roots; the number of intervals between them is one less. Distinctness matters. If $\gamma =\delta$, a reduced root system gives the set $\{\gamma ,-\gamma \}$, with a missing zero between them, so the consecutive-string theorem and the displayed simple-root formula do not apply.

In the G2 root system, the initial strings areFor $\delta =\alpha +3\beta$, $⟨\delta ,{\alpha }^{\vee }⟩=-1$. Since $\delta -\alpha =3\beta$ is not a root in a reduced root system, $p=0$ and $q=1$: this generates $2\alpha +3\beta$. The remaining strings explain why the construction stops. The $\alpha$-strings through $\beta$ and $\alpha +\beta$ are the same two-element string; the one through $\alpha +2\beta$ is a singleton since subtracting $\alpha$ gives $2\beta$, and its Cartan integer is zero; the one through $2\alpha +3\beta$ is the string $\{\alpha +3\beta ,2\alpha +3\beta \}$. The $\beta$-strings through $\alpha$, $\alpha +\beta$, $\alpha +2\beta$ and $\alpha +3\beta$ are the initial four-element string. Finally, $2\alpha +3\beta$ is orthogonal to $\beta$; its $\beta$-string is a singleton because $2\alpha +2\beta =2(\alpha +\beta )$ is not a root. Apply the same reasoning to negatives. Using the permitted completeness of this procedure givesThe short positive roots are $\beta ,\alpha +\beta ,\alpha +2\beta$, of squared length two; the other three are long, of squared length six. Each root space is one-dimensional and the Cartan subalgebra has dimension two, soHere the dimension refers to the Lie algebra, with one Cartan generator per rank, not just the number of roots.

Write a prospective weight as $w=a\alpha +b\beta$. The pairings with simple coroots areThe fundamental weights are dual to those coroots. Solving the two linear systems gives, in the long-root-first numbering of this paper,The representation with Dynkin labels $(0,1)$ has highest weight $\lambda ={\omega }_2$, a short root. Numbering the short root first, as some references do, would call this the $(1,0)$ representation instead; the representation itself is unchanged.

The weight set of a finite-dimensional irreducible highest-weight representation is invariant under the Weyl group and lies in the convex hull of the orbit of its highest weight. All weights also differ from the highest weight by an element of the root lattice. The orbit of $\lambda$ comprises the six short roots, so all six are weights. The lowering operators give the chainIn particular zero occurs: at weight $\beta$, its pairing with ${\beta }^{\vee }$ is two, so the lowering operator is nonzero by the finite-dimensional sl2 Lie algebra representation theory. The $\beta$-string through it is the usual three-weight string $\beta ,0,-\beta$; higher weight $2\beta$ would lie outside the highest-weight convex hull.

There can be no further weights. Every point of that convex hull has squared norm at most $\Vert \lambda {\Vert }^2=2$, while a root-lattice point hasThe integer solutions of the bound $\Vert w{\Vert }^2\le 2$ are precisely zero and the six short roots: $a=0$ gives $b=-1,0,1$; $a=1$ gives $b=1,2$; and $a=-1$ gives $b=-1,-2$. ThusThe final dimension uses the stipulated nondegeneracy of the weights. It also agrees with the Weyl dimension formula without that stipulation. The zero weight is not in the Weyl orbit of the nonzero weights, so this is not a minuscule representation.

In the diagram above, a coordinate label $(a,b)$ means $a\alpha +b\beta$. The left panel contains all twelve roots of a root system; the right panel contains the six short-root weights and the zero weight. The long-root-first convention is the same as in the calculations.

Use the coroot normalization ${\alpha }^{\vee }=2\alpha /(\alpha ,\alpha )$, with the pairing understood via the root system and its invariant inner product. A dominant integral weight, called a dominant weight here, is a functional $\lambda \in {\mathfrak{t}}^{\ast }$ such thatEquivalently, $\lambda ={\sum }_i{n}_i{\omega }_i$ with $n_i\in {\mathbb{Z}}_{\ge 0}$, where the fundamental weights satisfy $⟨{\omega }_i,{\alpha }_j^{\vee }⟩={\delta }_{ij}$. If dominance and integrality are defined separately, dominance means the inequalities and membership in the weight lattice means integrality.

A highest-weight vector is a nonzero weight vector $v\in V_{\lambda }$, so $h\cdot v=\lambda (h)v$ for all $h\in \mathfrak{t}$, annihilated by every positive root space:The last condition is equivalently annihilation by the raising operators for the simple roots.

For a dominant integral weight $\lambda$, let $V(\lambda )$ be the finite-dimensional irreducible highest-weight representation with highest weight $\lambda$. Set $\rho =\frac{1}{2}{\sum }_{\alpha \in {\Phi }^{+}}\alpha$, the half-sum of positive roots. With ${\alpha }^{\vee }$ the coroot of $\alpha$, the Weyl dimension formula isHere ${\Phi }^{+}$ is the positive system of a root system specified by the chosen root basis. The fundamental weights are the basis dual to the simple coroots: $⟨{\omega }_i,{\alpha }_j^{\vee }⟩={\delta }_{ij}$. Thus $\lambda ={\sum }_i{a}_i{\omega }_i$ with nonnegative integers $a_i$. The denominators are positive; equivalently one can use $(\lambda +\rho ,\alpha )/(\rho ,\alpha )$ in each factor, since the coroot normalization cancels.

Use the coroot ${\alpha }^{\vee }$ in the pairing. The original PDF retains this mark, which is lost in the local TeX transcription. Fix any positive root $\alpha$, and put $n=⟨\lambda ,{\alpha }^{\vee }⟩$. For a dominant integral weight, $n$ is a nonnegative integer; positive coroots are nonnegative integral combinations of simple coroots.

Let $v_{\lambda }$ be a highest-weight vector, and restrict to the sl2 subalgebra associated with a root $\alpha$. It is killed by its raising operator $e_{\alpha }$ and has $h_{\alpha }$ eigenvalue $n$. If $n\ge 1$, its lowering operator produces a nonzero vector: otherwise $[e_{\alpha },f_{\alpha }]v_{\lambda }=n{v}_{\lambda }$ would vanish. Therefore $\lambda -\alpha$ is a weight.

Choose a Weyl group invariant positive-definite inner product on the real weight space. All weights of a minuscule representation have the same norm, since they belong to $W\lambda$. ButIf $n\ge 2$, this is negative, a contradiction. Thus for every positive root,When $n=1$, the lower weight is precisely the Weyl reflection $s_{\alpha }\lambda =\lambda -\alpha$, consistent with the orbit condition.

Work over $\mathbb{R}$ or $\mathbb{C}$, in finite dimension and characteristic zero. The Killing form of a Lie algebra is the trace form of its Adjoint representation:It is bilinear and symmetric by the cyclic property of the trace. It is an invariant bilinear form on a Lie algebra, since the Jacobi identity gives ${\mathrm{ad}}_{[x,y]}=[{\mathrm{ad}}_x,{\mathrm{ad}}_y]$ and henceEquivalently, $\kappa ([z,x],y)+\kappa (x,[z,y])=0$. A Lie algebra automorphism preserves the form, because it conjugates the adjoint matrices. Its radical of a bilinear form ${\mathfrak{r}}_{\kappa }=\{x:\kappa (x,\mathfrak{g})=0\}$ is an ideal of a Lie algebra by invariance. The center of a Lie algebra lies in this radical, so the form vanishes for an abelian algebra. On a direct sum of ideals the summands are orthogonal and the form restricts to their own Killing forms.

A short argument proves the requested implication without assuming the Cartan criterion for semisimplicity. Let $\mathfrak{a}$ be an abelian ideal of a Lie algebra, $x\in \mathfrak{a}$, and $y\in \mathfrak{g}$. The map ${\mathrm{ad}}_x$ takes $\mathfrak{g}$ into $\mathfrak{a}$ and vanishes on $\mathfrak{a}$, while ${\mathrm{ad}}_y$ preserves $\mathfrak{a}$. Therefore ${\mathrm{ad}}_x{\mathrm{ad}}_y$ has image in $\mathfrak{a}$ and is zero on $\mathfrak{a}$. In a basis extending a basis of $\mathfrak{a}$, both diagonal blocks are zero, so its trace vanishes. This proves that abelian ideals lie in the radical of the Killing form.

If the solvable radical $\mathfrak{r}$ were nonzero, its derived series of a Lie algebra would have a last nonzero term $\mathfrak{a}$. The Jacobi identity makes every derived term an ideal of $\mathfrak{g}$, and the last one is abelian. Thus $0\ne \mathfrak{a}\subseteq {\mathfrak{r}}_{\kappa }$, contradicting nondegeneracy. We obtainThe converse holds as well in characteristic zero; together these implications are the Cartan criterion for semisimplicity.

For a complex simple Lie algebra, that criterion gives nondegeneracy on $\mathfrak{g}$. Let $\mathfrak{h}$ be a Cartan subalgebra. Use the standard root-space decompositionFor $h,h^{\prime }\in \mathfrak{h}$ and a root vector $e_{\alpha }$, choose $t\in \mathfrak{h}$ with $\alpha (t)\ne 0$. Invariance givesThus $\mathfrak{h}$ is orthogonal to every nonzero root space. If $h\in \mathfrak{h}$ is also orthogonal to $\mathfrak{h}$, it is orthogonal to all of $\mathfrak{g}$ and hence is zero. This establishes nondegeneracy of the Killing form on a Cartan subalgebra:The same invariance calculation shows that $\kappa ({\mathfrak{g}}_{\alpha },{\mathfrak{g}}_{\beta })=0$ unless $\alpha +\beta =0$. Opposite root spaces are therefore paired nondegenerately. Tracing the adjoint action on the root-space decomposition yieldssince the root spaces of a complex semisimple algebra are one-dimensional and its adjoint action on $\mathfrak{h}$ is zero.

The relevant Euclidean subspace of a Cartan subalgebra iswhere the $h_{{\alpha }_i}$ are the simple coroots, normalized by ${\alpha }_i(h_{{\alpha }_i})=2$. The standard Euclidean property is that $\kappa$ is real and positive definite on this space. The displayed trace formula explains it: $\kappa (h,h)$ is a sum of real squares, and the roots span ${\mathfrak{h}}^{\ast }$, so all squares vanish only for $h=0$. Via the nondegenerate form, the roots can consequently be regarded as vectors in a real Euclidean normed vector space. The induced dual inner product makes root reflections orthogonal and allows root lengths and angles to be encoded by Cartan integers and the Dynkin diagram.

This positivity is on a specified real subspace; the complex Killing form is a bilinear form, not a positive Hermitian inner product. On a compact real form the Killing form is instead negative definite. For example the Killing form of the special linear Lie algebra gives $\kappa (X,Y)=4\mathrm{tr}(XY)$ for ${\mathfrak{sl}}_2$, so $\kappa (L_0,L_0)=8$ but $\kappa (i{L}_0,i{L}_0)=-8$.

With the Euclidean inner product used above, the simple coroots areIndeed, if a positive root is $\beta ={\sum }_i{n}_i{\alpha }_i$, thenwhose coefficients are nonnegative. The negative roots give the negatives of these combinations, so the displayed coroots form a fundamental system of a root system for the dual root system.

Duality reverses root lengths. The dual of $C_3$ is therefore the B3 root system: its Dynkin diagram is again a three-node chain with a double final edge, but its arrow points toward the now-short root ${\alpha }_3^{\vee }$.

For a dominant integral highest weight $\lambda$, the Weyl dimension formula iswhere ${\Phi }^{+}$ is the chosen positive system of a root system, ${\alpha }^{\vee }$ is a coroot, and $\rho$ is the Weyl vector.

A finite root system in a real Euclidean vector space $E$ is a finite spanning set $\Phi \subset E\setminus \{0\}$ such that, for every $\alpha \in \Phi$, the root reflectionpreserves $\Phi$, and the Cartan integer $2(\beta ,\alpha )/(\alpha ,\alpha )$ is an integer for all $\alpha ,\beta \in \Phi$. It is reduced when the only scalar multiples of $\alpha$ in $\Phi$ are $\alpha$ and $-\alpha$. Its Weyl group is the subgroup of the orthogonal group generated by the reflections $s_{\alpha }$. A base of a root system $\Delta$ is a basis of $E$ such that every root is an integer combination of elements of $\Delta$ whose nonzero coefficients all have the same sign.

The coroot of $\alpha$ isLet $C$ be the Weyl chamber determined by $\Delta$:The roots $\alpha$ and ${\alpha }^{\vee }$ are positive scalar multiples, so their reflecting hyperplanes and their positive half-spaces are identical. The same chamber $C$ therefore defines positivity in the coroot system ${\Phi }^{\vee }$. Its walls correspond exactly to the rays ${\mathbb{R}}_{>0}{\alpha }^{\vee }$ for $\alpha \in \Delta$. Hence its simple roots arewhich is therefore a base of ${\Phi }^{\vee }$.

The highest root isSince $\beta$ is long and the ${\epsilon }_i$ are orthonormal, ${\beta }^{\vee }=\beta$. The coroot pairing gives

Let $R^{+}$ be the positive roots, $W$ the Weyl group, $\ell (w)$ its Coxeter length, $\rho$ the half-sum of positive roots, and ${\alpha }^{\vee }$ a coroot. For a dominant integral highest weight $\lambda$, the Weyl character formula isTaking the value at the identity gives the Weyl dimension formula

For the q-character convention relevant to the Principal sl2 subalgebra, set $h_{\mathrm{pr}}=2{\rho }^{\vee }$, so ${\alpha }_i(h_{\mathrm{pr}})=2$ for every simple root, and defineThe q-character formula is the principal specialization of the Weyl character formula:

Choose positive roots of a root system ${\epsilon }_i-{\epsilon }_j$, ${\epsilon }_i+{\epsilon }_j$ for $i<j$, and $2{\epsilon }_i$. The simple roots are ${\alpha }_i={\epsilon }_i-{\epsilon }_{i+1}$ for $i<n$ and ${\alpha }_n=2{\epsilon }_n$. Their coroots are ${\alpha }_i^{\vee }={\epsilon }_i-{\epsilon }_{i+1}$ and ${\alpha }_n^{\vee }={\epsilon }_n$. Therefore the fundamental weights and Weyl vector areThe highest root is $2{\epsilon }_1=2{\alpha }_1+\cdots +2{\alpha }_{n-1}+{\alpha }_n$. These formulas include rank one.

For chosen simple roots, the corresponding coroots are the simple coroots. They form the simple system of the dual root system. The fundamental weights are defined by $⟨{\omega }_j,{\alpha }_i^{\vee }⟩={\delta }_{ij}$, so pairings with simple coroots record coordinates in the fundamental-weight basis.

A weight-space decomposition expresses a Lie algebra representation as a direct sum of simultaneous eigenspaces for a Cartan subalgebra. Each summand is the weight space for its weight. In complex finite-dimensional representations of a semisimple Lie algebra, the simple coroots act as commuting diagonalizable operators, giving this decomposition.