Countable additivity Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
For pairwise disjoint measurable sets , countable additivity means
The infinite series is the limit of its nonnegative partial sums. This controls an entire countable union, not merely each finite stage. If enumerate the rational numbers in , their finite collections have Lebesgue measure zero, and countable additivity gives their whole union Lebesgue measure zero. Their being a dense set does not change this calculation.
The axiom makes no assertion about an arbitrary uncountable set of disjoint pieces. In particular, is the union of its singletons, each of Lebesgue measure zero, yet its Lebesgue measure is one. Extending additivity to all such unions would contradict interval length.
Lebesgue measure Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Lebesgue measure on the real numbers extends interval length: for . Its restriction to the Borel sigma-algebra is the unique translation-invariant sigma-finite measure on that sigma-algebra normalized by . The full Lebesgue measure is the completion of a measure of this restriction; its domain is the Lebesgue measurable sets. Translation invariance follows by comparing a translated Borel measure on half-open intervals and applying the uniqueness theorem for measures. For the construction and interval properties, see MIT lecture 8.
Every singleton has Lebesgue measure zero: gives for every . Enumerating the countable set and applying countable additivity yields
Thus a dense set can be a null set, and a union of null sets indexed by an uncountable set can have positive Lebesgue measure. The distinction explains both the Dirichlet function example and why almost everywhere is weaker than everywhere.
Measure theory Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Measure theory studies measures, which assign sizes to measurable sets, and the Lebesgue integral, which accumulates values weighted by those sizes. The same framework describes Lebesgue measure on the real numbers, counting measure on discrete collections, and probability measures on possible outcomes. The choice of measure determines what counts as large; the choice of sigma-algebra determines what can be measured.
A striking example separates size from proximity: the rational numbers in form a dense set with Lebesgue measure zero, although the whole interval has Lebesgue measure one. This distinction makes almost everywhere statements useful: exceptional null sets can be ignored in a Lebesgue integral even when they meet every open subinterval. The monotone convergence theorem and dominated convergence theorem then give precise conditions for passing a limit through an integral.
A historical starting point is Lebesgue's 1902 thesis, [ref]. Its title connects integration with the geometric task of assigning sizes.
Let . If , part (a) provides a nonzero bounded functional annihilating ; normalize it to have norm one. Density of the sequence in the dual unit ball gives an index with . Since and ,
But the hypothesis and reverse triangle inequality give
a contradiction. Therefore the span is dense.
If is separable, its unit ball has a countable dense set. For each nonzero , the definition of its norm permits choosing in the unit ball with ; choose zero for a zero functional. The preceding result gives a dense countable span over , or over in the complex case. Thus is separable.
The converse fails: is separable, since finite rational-coordinate sequences are dense, but is not separable. The dual identification sends a bounded sequence to , isometrically; conversely a bounded functional is determined by its values on the coordinate vectors and hence has this form by truncation. The uncountable family of zero-one sequences in has pairwise distance one, which no countable dense set can approximate within a radius smaller than .
If the origin had a countable local basis , replace it by the decreasing local basis . Each meets the dense set , so choose . Given any neighbourhood of the origin, some is contained in ; for every we then have . Thus converges to the origin, contradicting the preceding part. Consequently first countability fails already at the origin, and is not first countable.
The set is countable and dense in . Restriction to is injective on continuous functions : if two such functions agree there, their equality set is closed and contains a dense set, so is all of . Equivalently a sequence of points of converging to any chosen point and continuity determine its value uniquely.
Thus the family has cardinality at most
For the lower bound, every real number determines a different constant continuous function. Cantor-Schröder-Bernstein yields
The reduction to countably many values is the feature that separates this answer from unrestricted functions.
First prove the Baire category theorem in its complete-metric form. Let be a nonempty complete metric space, let be open dense sets, and let be any nonempty open set. Choose a closed ball with . Inductively, density and openness permit the choice
For , belongs to the th closed ball, so . The centers form a Cauchy sequence and converge to some by completeness. Each closed ball contains all later centers and therefore contains their limit. Hence . Since this holds for every , every countable intersection of open dense sets is dense. Equivalently, a nonempty complete metric space cannot be a countable union of closed sets with empty interior; this is the form needed below.
For the Banach-Steinhaus theorem, let be a Banach space, a normed vector space, and a family of bounded linear operators from to such that for every . Define
Each is closed, as an intersection of inverse images of closed balls under continuous maps, and pointwise boundedness gives . The Baire category theorem gives some with nonempty interior. Choose . If , both and lie in , so for every . Applying this to with proves
This proves the Uniform boundedness principle; completeness is required for the domain, but not for .
Now fix the prescribed point on the unit circle, parametrized by angles modulo . On the real Banach space with the supremum norm, consider the continuous linear functionals , where is the symmetric Fourier partial sum. Summing the finite geometric series gives its Dirichlet kernel representation
The continuous extension at is . The kernel bound gives . Equality holds: the continuous periodic functions defined by
have supremum norm at most one, and dominated convergence gives as .
These norms are unbounded. Indeed, evenness and for give
For the second inequality, integrate over , where and the integral of is two. The harmonic series diverges, proving the Dirichlet kernel harmonic lower bound. If every continuous had bounded partial sums at , the Banach-Steinhaus theorem would bound all the operator norms, a contradiction. Consequently there exists a continuous real function with , and its Fourier series diverges at the prescribed point. The function depends on the chosen point; the argument requires no claim of simultaneous divergence everywhere.
We prove the Casorati-Weierstrass theorem by contradiction. Fix an allowed . If the stated image were not a dense set in , there would be a disc disjoint from it. Hence
The holomorphic function is bounded by on that punctured disc. By the permitted Riemann removable singularity theorem, it extends to a holomorphic function on the full disc.
If , then is holomorphic near and agrees with away from . This makes a removable singularity of .
If , then is not identically zero, since is nowhere zero away from . Its Taylor series therefore has a finite first nonzero coefficient: otherwise the identity theorem would make it identically zero. Write with and . Then
has a pole of order at , since multiplying by gives the nonzero limit .
Both cases contradict an essential singularity. Thus
Collapsing the integers gives a Hausdorff space. For two distinct noninteger points, choose disjoint small open intervals around them that avoid . Each interval is saturated under the saturation of a subset operation, so its image is an open neighbourhood of its class. For a noninteger and the collapsed class, choose . The disjoint open sets
are saturated; contains and contains all integers. Their images separate the two quotient points. These exhaust all pairs of distinct classes.
Collapsing the rationals does not give a Hausdorff space. The preimage of the singleton collapsed point is , which is not closed in . Therefore that quotient singleton is not closed, whereas every singleton of a Hausdorff space is closed.
Equivalently, every nonempty saturated open subset of meets the dense set and therefore contains it all. Every nonempty quotient open set contains the collapsed point, making separation from any other quotient point impossible.
Fix a real angle fraction , and repeatedly multiply by in the circle group. The generated cyclic subgroup is . Equivalently, the angle fractions are the fractional parts of , with one full turn identified with zero.
If is a rational number in lowest terms, with and coprime, then and no smaller positive power is . Hence is a finite cyclic group of order , consisting of equally spaced points. For , the successive angle fractions, starting at , are
The subgroup is finite, so it is a closed subgroup of the circle group; it is also a discrete subgroup. It is not an open subgroup, since every ambient neighbourhood of any of its points contains an arc, rather than only these seven points.
If is an irrational number, no nonzero integer satisfies , so the powers never repeat. The stronger statement is that is a dense set in the circle group: every nonempty open arc contains a power . Thus its closure is all of , while itself is a countable proper subgroup and is not a closed subgroup or a discrete subgroup. See irrational rotation and everywhere interval frequency under an irrational rotation for the corresponding motion and its long-term frequencies.
For , direct computation of the fractional parts of gives, to six decimal places,
For example, and . These calculations specify exactly which points the diagram displays.
Figure 1.
Seven repeating rational-rotation points and the first eight and sixty-four irrational-rotation points
. Labels give the power index ; the points are . The first panel uses , and the other two use . Each finite sample is only an illustration: a finite plot cannot establish that the infinite subgroup is a dense set. Reproduce the diagram with rational-versus-irrational-rotations.py. Details.
This example shows why algebraic generation and closure must be distinguished: one irrational rotation generates a countable cyclic subgroup, yet its closure is the whole uncountable compact group.