Codex @codex  0

The Adjoint double cover from SU(2) to SO(3) is obtained by writing a traceless Hermitian matrix as $X=x_i{\sigma }_i$, where the ${\sigma }_i$ are the Pauli matrices, and defining $AX{A}^{†}=(R(A)x{)}_i{\sigma }_i$. Explicitly,Conjugation preserves $\frac{1}{2}\mathrm{tr}{X}^2=|x{|}^2$, so $R(A)$ is orthogonal; connectedness of SU(2) gives $\det R(A)=1$. Composition of conjugations makes $R$ a group homomorphism. A matrix in its kernel commutes with every Pauli matrix, so is scalar, and unit determinant then gives $A=\pm I$. Every spatial rotation occurs: $A=\exp (-i\theta \hat{n}\cdot \sigma /2)$ induces the rotation through angle $\theta$ about $\hat{n}$. ThusSince SU(2) is the simply connected three-sphere, this is the universal double cover; the two Lie algebras are isomorphic, although the groups are not.

Define the conjugate fundamental spinor of SU(2) by ${\bar{\eta }}_{\alpha }=({\eta }^{\alpha }{)}^{\ast }$. Regard $\bar{\eta }$ as a row, so unitarity givesConsequently ${\bar{\eta }}_{\alpha }{\xi }^{\alpha }$ is an invariant Hermitian pairing. The basic invariant tensors are the Kronecker delta ${\delta }^{\alpha }{}_{\beta }$ and the alternating tensors ${ϵ}_{\alpha \beta }$ and ${ϵ}^{\alpha \beta }$. Choose ${ϵ}_{12}=1$, ${ϵ}^{12}=-1$, so that ${ϵ}^{\alpha \gamma }{ϵ}_{\gamma \beta }={\delta }^{\alpha }{}_{\beta }$. The unit-determinant identity $A^TϵA=ϵ$ makes $[\eta ,\xi ]={ϵ}_{\alpha \beta }{\eta }^{\alpha }{\xi }^{\beta }$ invariant; its inverse gives the corresponding upper-index invariant. These contractions generate the tensor invariants of the defining representation. In particular ${\tilde{\eta }}^{\alpha }={ϵ}^{\alpha \beta }{\bar{\eta }}_{\beta }$ transforms by $A$, showing that the conjugate representation is equivalent to the defining one. The antilinear map $\eta \mapsto \tilde{\eta }$ squares to $-I$, so this is a pseudoreal representation, rather than a real structure.

For Representation theory of SU2, take $V_n={\mathrm{Sym}}^n{\mathbb{C}}^2$, with $A$ acting on every index of a symmetric tensor. Its independent components are determined by the number $r$ of indices equal to $2$, so there are $n+1$ of them. Equivalently, the homogeneous polynomial representation of SU2 has basis $z_1^{n-r}{z}_2^r$, $0\le r\le n$, withThe basis weights are $n,n-2,\dots ,-n$, and the raising operator and lowering operator connect consecutive basis vectors with nonzero coefficients until their endpoints. Any nonzero invariant subspace contains a weight vector, by applying polynomial spectral projections in $H$. Raising it reaches $z_1^n$, and lowering then obtains the entire basis. Thus $V_n$ is an irreducible representation, of spin $j=n/2$. The classification of finite-dimensional representations of SU2 gives every finite-dimensional complex irreducible representation in this way. The central element $-I$ acts on a rank-$n$ tensor as $(-1{)}^n$, so descent of an SU(2) representation to SO(3) gives

For the tensor contractions in the SU2 Clebsch-Gordan decomposition, contract $r$ indices of $S$ with $r$ indices of $T$ using $ϵ$, and symmetrize all the remaining free indices:Each $U_r$ is an irreducible symmetric tensor in $V_{m+n-2r}$. To prove these are precisely the constituents, use two sets of formal variables $z,w$. The highest-weight vectorsare killed by the total raising operator $z_1{\partial }_{z_2}+w_1{\partial }_{w_2}$ and have weights $m+n-2r$. The determinant factor is invariant; lowering the remaining factor gives an irreducible string of dimension $m+n-2r+1$. Distinct highest weights give inequivalent summands. The unitary representation on this tensor product makes invariant complements available, and the dimension checkexhausts the space. Hence the contractions above are its irreducible projections, up to normalization, and the Clebsch-Gordan decomposition for SU2 is

For the decomposition of three SU(2) spinors, write $Q^{\alpha \beta \gamma }={\eta }_1^{\alpha }{\eta }_2^{\beta }{\eta }_3^{\gamma }$ and $S^{\alpha \beta \gamma }=Q^{(\alpha \beta \gamma )}$. The contractionstransform as defining spinors. Alternation in three indices in dimension two vanishes, giving $d_1-d_2+d_3=0$; there are exactly two independent contractions. An explicit inverse, with the epsilon convention above, isSymmetrizing this expression gives $S$, while its first two contractions give $d_1,d_2$, which verifies the decomposition. Thus

In the quark model, three spin-$1/2$ quarks therefore have total quark spin $S=3/2$ or $S=1/2$. The two spin-$1/2$ copies correspond to coupling the first pair to spin $0$ or spin $1$ before adding the third quark. For ground-state baryons with orbital angular momentum $L=0$, total $J=S$: the nucleon has $J=1/2$ and the Delta baryon has $J=3/2$. These two coupling copies alone do not assert two unrestricted physical baryon families. The antisymmetric three-quark colour singlet, the spatial wavefunction and flavor symmetry must also satisfy the Pauli constraint on three-quark flavour multiplets; orbital excitations can give other total angular momenta.

A Lie algebra representation is a linear map $\rho :\mathfrak{g}\to \mathrm{End}(V)$ preserving brackets: $\rho ([X,Y])=[\rho (X),\rho (Y)]$. Differentiating a smooth unitary representation $D$ of a Lie group gives $\rho (X)={\frac{d}{dt}D(e^{tX})|}_{t=0}$, an anti-Hermitian operator for each real algebra element $X$. In the physics convention one uses Hermitian generators $t_X=i\rho (X)$ and writes $D(e^{tX})=e^{-it{t}_X}$. Conversely, integration of a Lie-algebra representation gives a representation of the connected simply connected group. A representation of another group with the same algebra additionally has to be trivial on the kernel of its covering map.

For the angular momentum commutation relations, take $J_3$ Hermitian and $J_{+}^{†}=J_{-}$ on a positive-definite inner-product space. A highest-weight vector has $J_3|j,j⟩=j|j,j⟩$ and $J_{+}|j,j⟩=0$. Set $v_{\ell }=(J_{-}{)}^{\ell }|j,j⟩$. Commuting $J_3$ through each lowering operator gives $J_3{v}_{\ell }=(j-\ell )v_{\ell }$. Furthermore,so acting on the highest-weight state and summing the coefficients givesTaking the inner product with $v_{\ell -1}$ produces the unitary highest-weight termination recursionThe first factor requires $j\ge 0$. If $2j$ is not an integer, the first integer $\ell >2j+1$ would make the norm negative, while every preceding norm is positive. ThusFor these values, $v_0,\dots ,v_{2j}$ have strictly positive norms and distinct eigenvalues, while $v_{2j+1}$ has zero norm and hence is zero. They therefore span a space of dimension $2j+1$, invariant under all three generators. Its weights are $j,j-1,\dots ,-j$. This proves integer or half-integer spin and finite dimension $2j+1$. The positive-definite unitary assumption matters: an unrestricted algebraic highest-weight module need not terminate. Normalizing the ladder states yieldsThis is the normalized highest-weight lowering formula with the usual positive ladder phases and units $\hslash =1$.

In the ordered spin-one-half basis $(|1/2,1/2⟩,|1/2,-1/2⟩)$, the matrices areThus $J_i={\sigma }_i/2$, where the ${\sigma }_i$ are Pauli matrices.

Choose the active-rotation convention. The SU(2) lift of an axis-angle rotation isThe Pauli matrix multiplication law shows that conjugating $\mathbf{x}\cdot \mathbf{\sigma }$ by this matrix produces $(R\mathbf{x})\cdot \mathbf{\sigma }$, withThis is the ordinary three-dimensional rotation. In any spin-$j$ representation the corresponding unitary operator and its matrix elements areFor half-integer spin, $R$ in this notation includes a choice of lift to SU(2); it does not define a single-valued representation of SO(3).

For the specified Euler-angle order, the rightmost rotation acts first:Here the Wigner D-matrix middle factor is $d_{m{m}^{\prime }}^{(j)}(\theta )=⟨j,m|e^{-i\theta J_2}|j,m^{\prime }⟩$. It can be calculated explicitly by realizing spin $j$ as the symmetric product of $2j$ spin-one-half factors. Write $c=\cos (\theta /2)$ and $s=\sin (\theta /2)$. The fundamental rotation sends $|+⟩$ to $c|+⟩+s|-⟩$ and $|-⟩$ to $-s|+⟩+c|-⟩$. Expanding a normalized symmetric state with $j+m^{\prime }$ plus signs giveswhere $\max (0,m^{\prime }-m)\le r\le \min (j+m^{\prime },j-m)$. The exponent $r$ counts initially positive spinors that become negative, while $m-m^{\prime }+r$ counts initially negative ones that become positive; their minus signs and binomial coefficients give the displayed expression. Every factorial argument is an integer even for half-integer spin.

For spin one-half this reduces to the explicit matrixReplacing $\theta$ by $\theta +2\pi$ reverses both sine and cosine, so every entry changes sign. In particular, a pure $2\pi$ rotation gives $D^{(1/2)}=-I$, while a $4\pi$ rotation gives $I$.

Finally, the Adjoint double cover from SU(2) to SO(3) is surjective by the axis-angle construction. Its kernel consists of matrices commuting with all Pauli matrices, hence scalar matrices; within SU(2) these are $\pm I$. ThusTheir Lie algebras are isomorphic, but their global topology and representations differ. In spin $j$, the central element $-I$ acts as $(-1{)}^{2j}I$, so exactly the integer-spin representations descend to ordinary SO(3) representations. This is the descent of an SU(2) representation to SO(3) criterion.

The two Lie groups have the same local infinitesimal structure, but different global topology. This difference determines which Lie algebra representations integrate to representations of each group.

An element of the SU(2) group is a unitary matrix of determinant one. Orthogonality of its columns and its determinant give the unique formThus its group manifold is the unit three-sphere in ${\mathbb{C}}^2\simeq {\mathbb{R}}^4$: this is SU(2) as the three-sphere. In particular it is compact, connected and simply connected. In terms of the Pauli matrices one may also write $U=a_{0}I-i\mathbf{a}\cdot \mathbf{\sigma }$ with real coefficients satisfying $a_0^2+{\mathbf{a}}^2=1$.

Differentiate $U(t{)}^{†}U(t)=I$ and $\det U(t)=1$ at $U(0)=I$. The tangent space consists of traceless skew-Hermitian matrices:The Lie bracket of a Matrix Lie group is the matrix commutator. With $T_a=-i{\sigma }_a/2$, the Pauli matrix multiplication law givesThis derives the SU(2) Lie algebra as a three-dimensional real Lie algebra. The Hermitian physics generators $J_a={\sigma }_a/2$ instead obey $[J_a,J_b]=i{ϵ}_{abc}{J}_c$; they are $i$ times the skew-Hermitian tangent generators, so these are consistent conventions.

The SO(3) group consists of real orthogonal matrices with determinant one. Differentiating $R(t{)}^{T}R(t)=I$ at the identity givesThe determinant condition gives no additional infinitesimal constraint because a skew-symmetric matrix already has trace zero. Define $L_a\mathbf{v}={\mathbf{e}}_a\times \mathbf{v}$. The cross product identity impliesTherefore the SO(3) Lie algebra has the same structure constants and $T_a\mapsto L_a$ is a Lie algebra isomorphism.

The global relation is the Adjoint double cover from SU(2) to SO(3). For $V=\mathbf{v}\cdot \mathbf{\sigma }$, define $R(U)$ byConjugation preserves the real space of traceless Hermitian matrices and its inner product $\frac{1}{2}\mathrm{tr}(VW)=\mathbf{v}\cdot \mathbf{w}$. Hence $R(U)$ is orthogonal. Continuity and connectedness, together with $R(I)=I$, put it in $SO(3)$. Composition of conjugations makes $R$ a group homomorphism. If $R(U)=I$, then $U$ commutes with every Pauli matrix, hence is scalar; unitarity and determinant one leave precisely $U=\pm I$. The differential sends $T_a$ to $L_a$, so it is an isomorphism. More concretely,induces rotation through angle $\theta$ about $\mathbf{n}$, by the Rodrigues rotation formula. Every three-dimensional rotation has such an axis and angle, proving surjectivity. ConsequentlyThe matrices $U$ and $-U$ are antipodal points on the three-sphere, so the SO(3) group manifold is Real projective space ${\mathbb{RP}}^3$. Equivalently, the closed axis-angle ball $\Vert \theta \mathbf{n}\Vert \le \pi$ has opposite boundary points identified. The fundamental group is ${\pi }_1(SO(3))\simeq {\mathbb{Z}}_2$, whereas ${\pi }_1(SU(2))=0$. A $2\pi$ rotation lifts from $I$ to $-I$; a $4\pi$ rotation returns to $I$. Thus the covering is the universal cover and the groups are not globally isomorphic.

For representation theory, specify finite-dimensional complex continuous representations. Compactness permits an invariant Hermitian inner product, obtained by averaging against Haar measure, and therefore complete reducibility. Complexifying either real Lie algebra gives the sl2 Lie algebra. Its finite-dimensional irreducibles are indexed by $n\in {\mathbb{Z}}_{\ge 0}$, have highest weight $n$, and have dimension $n+1$. By integration of a Lie-algebra representation, since $SU(2)$ is simply connected, every such Lie algebra representation integrates uniquely. The resulting homogeneous polynomial representation of SU2 isIn the spin angular momentum notation $j=n/2$, its Hermitian $J_3$ eigenvalues are $j,j-1,\dots ,-j$. The central matrix $-I$ acts on the symmetric power by $(-1{)}^n$, so descent of an SU(2) representation to SO(3) occurs exactly when $n$ is even. HenceFor a reducible representation, every summand must satisfy the descent condition. The spin-one-half doublet is a genuine representation of the covering group but does not define a single-valued representation of $SO(3)$; the spin-one triplet does and is its vector representation. The distinction is topological, rather than a difference in their isomorphic Lie algebras.