Effective beam shear rigidity is the coefficient relating a transverse shear-force resultant to the beam shear angle in a reduced linear beam model:
Here is shear modulus, is material area and is a beam shear correction coefficient. The coefficient has units of force, whereas beam flexural rigidity has units . A shear-deformable beam permits section rotation to differ from centreline slope; Bower gives the corresponding force relation and explains the correction coefficient's dependence on section geometry and the approximation used.[ref]
An original energy calculation explains one familiar correction. For a homogeneous rectangle of width , thickness and area , adopt the classical parabolic shear-stress approximation
It has resultant . Its shear elastic energy per unit beam length is
Equating this to the reduced-model energy gives . Thus follows from this particular energy-matching approximation; it is not a universal material constant or an exact coefficient for every beam theory.
The effect on a three-point bending test can be derived from that reduced energy. For a simply supported beam under central force , the magnitude of shear force is on each half. Hence and its contribution to central displacement is . Combining it with the bending response gives
The shear contribution becomes relatively more important as the span decreases.
For stipulated , , and , the two contributions are and . Shear adds twelve percent of the bending deflection. A span series with a load cell and direct midspan displacement readout can distinguish cubic bending dependence from linear shear dependence, provided contact and fixture contributions are also controlled. Inferring from the response additionally requires the section geometry and correction model.
The beam shear correction coefficient adjusts a reduced beam model's shear response for the nonuniform shear stress over a material section. With shear modulus , area , transverse force resultant and generalized beam shear angle ,
where is effective beam shear rigidity. Bower's primary account calls this the Timoshenko shear coefficient and explains that its value depends on geometry, Poisson's ratio and how the approximate theory is matched to the underlying solid.[ref]
An original energy-matching derivation makes the correction precise for one approximation. Assume uniform and a chosen shear-stress field with resultant . The shear elastic energy per unit beam length and its reduced representation are
Thus
The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality gives , hence for this definition. Equality requires uniform stress. This bound belongs to the stated energy-matching definition rather than every convention called a shear correction coefficient.
For the parabolic rectangular stress approximation used in effective beam shear rigidity, the squared-stress integral is , giving . Choose , and . Then and radians. Omitting the correction gives , underestimating this generalized shear angle by one sixth.
The generalized angle also differs from the peak local shear strain. Under the same parabolic approximation, peak stress is , giving peak strain . The values describe different reductions of the same chosen stress field. Identifying from a bending test therefore requires the section model and displacement readout, not merely a material modulus. For a three-point bending test, the shear deflection contribution varies as , whereas bending varies as ; a span comparison can help separate them.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.