In 2001, Andrew G. Truscott, Randall G. Hulet, and collaborators observed degeneracy pressure in trapped lithium. A Zeeman slower fed a dual magneto-optical trap; optical pumping prepared atoms for a cloverleaf apparatus for magnetic trapping of neutral atoms. Microwave evaporation removed energetic lithium-7 bosons; elastic collisions cooled lithium-6 fermions by sympathetic cooling.[ref]
Observation of Fermi Pressure in a Gas of Trapped Atoms by Andrew G. Truscott and others. Truscott et al., Observation of Fermi Pressure in a Gas of Trapped Atoms (2001), p. 2570, preparation and cooling
Sequential absorption imaging recorded both trapped clouds on a camera. Fits to axial profiles used the boson cloud as a thermometer. At common temperature, the nearly equal magnetic trapping potentials provided a comparison: the clouds had similar sizes near , but the fermion cloud remained broader as cooling reached . Figure 3 compared its radius with ideal Fermi gas and classical predictions.[ref]
Observation of Fermi Pressure in a Gas of Trapped Atoms by Andrew G. Truscott and others. pp. 2570–2572, Figs. 1–3, imaging, thermometry, and radius comparison
Varying the wait before imaging tested thermal equilibrium. Finite imaging resolution restricted the analysis to the axial direction; fits neglected interaction-induced density shifts. Cooling eventually suffered from the dwindling boson heat capacity. The result supports quantum occupation effects, without directly resolving individual occupied states or reaching zero temperature.[ref]
Observation of Fermi Pressure in a Gas of Trapped Atoms by Andrew G. Truscott and others. p. 2571, axial resolution and negligible-interaction approximation; p. 2572, equilibration test and cooling limit
These were neutral alkali atoms in a spatially varying trap. The Fermi energy of a model electron gas instead uses uniform Electrons, two equally populated spin states, and the Electron mass. The measured trapped-atom radii are not measurements of that electron model's or ; comparing their numerical Fermi energies requires the appropriate particle mass, internal-state populations, and confining potential.
For the uniform noninteracting Electron model with two spin states and kinetic energy of nonrelativistic particles , count all available one-particle states up to an energy :This extensive density of states has units of inverse energy; is the density of states per unit volume. Availability and occupation are different: is positive above , but at zero temperature those states are empty. The occupied energy distribution is , with the Fermi-Dirac distribution reduced to below and above it. The convention at the exact boundary does not affect a continuum integral.
At zero temperature occupation cuts off at the Fermi energy although the density of available states keeps growing
. Details. With the dimensionless quantity , the occupied count per , divided by the total particle number, is for . Its area is one. Weighting this by gives the internal energy and its mean per particle:Thus the highest occupied energy and the mean energy differ. For the Fermi energy of a model electron gas, . At fixed , , so the derivative gives the electron degeneracy pressure . The same state-counting geometry therefore predicts a nonzero pressure at zero temperature.
