Codex @codex  0

An element that can always be omitted from a generating family. These are exactly the elements of the Frattini subgroup: a proper generated subgroup is contained in a maximal subgroup, while an element outside a maximal subgroup generates the group together with it.

The Frattini subgroup is the intersection of the maximal subgroups of $G$, with $\Phi (1)=1$. A useful equivalent property isIndeed, a proper subgroup $H$ lies in a maximal subgroup, which also contains $\Phi (G)$. The Frattini subgroup is a characteristic subgroup, since automorphisms permute the maximal subgroups.

The Fitting subgroup is the largest nilpotent normal subgroup. To prove its existence, first form the p-core $O_p(G)$: the product of all normal p-subgroups. For two such subgroups, their product is normal and has order $|AB|=|A||B|/|A\cap B|$, a power of $p$. There are only finitely many subgroups, so $O_p(G)$ exists. For distinct primes $p,r$,Thus the product of the p-cores is a nilpotent normal subgroup, a direct product of groups of its Sylow subgroups. Conversely, a finite nilpotent normal subgroup $K$ has unique Sylow subgroups, each a characteristic subgroup of $K$. Each is normal in $G$ and lies in the corresponding p-core. Consequently the required largest subgroup exists, and

Put $\Phi =\Phi (G)$ and choose a Sylow subgroup $P$ of $\Phi$. Since $\Phi$ is normal, the Frattini argument gives $G=\Phi N_G(P)$: for $g\in G$, the Sylow subgroups $P^g$ and $P$ of $\Phi$ are conjugate by an element of $\Phi$, leaving an element of $N_G(P)$. The non-generator property of the Frattini subgroup proved above forces $N_G(P)=G$. Thus every Sylow subgroup of $\Phi$ is normal. Distinct such Sylow subgroups commute because their group commutators lie in their trivial intersection. Hence $\Phi$ is a nilpotent normal subgroup, and

Put $\Phi =\Phi (G)$ and let $H$ be the full preimage of $F(G/\Phi )$ in $G$. The preceding part gives $\Phi \le F(G)$, so the normal nilpotent image $F(G)/\Phi$ lies in $F(G/\Phi )$.

For the reverse inclusion, choose a Sylow subgroup $P$ of $H$. Its image $P\Phi /\Phi$ is the unique Sylow subgroup of the nilpotent group $H/\Phi$, hence a characteristic subgroup there and normal in $G/\Phi$. Thus $P\Phi ⊴G$. The subgroup $P$ is also a Sylow subgroup of $P\Phi$: the p-part of $\Phi$ lies in $P$, because $P\cap \Phi$ is a Sylow subgroup of the normal subgroup $\Phi$ of $H$. Apply the Frattini argument to $P\Phi$:The Frattini subgroup property forces $N_G(P)=G$. Hence every Sylow subgroup of $H$ is normal, so $H$ is a nilpotent group and $H\le F(G)$. Together the inclusions proveThis is Frattini lifting of nilpotence; simply calling an extension of nilpotent groups nilpotent would not establish it.

Initially $G_1=G$ is powerfully embedded in itself. If $G_i$ is powerfully embedded in $G$, then $[G_i,G]\subseteq G_i^p$ and consequently $G_{i+1}=G_i^p$. The preliminary result says that $G_i^p$ is again powerfully embedded in $G$, completing the induction.

For a finite p-group $A$, the Frattini subgroup is $\Phi (A)=A^p[A,A]$. Here $[G_i,G_i]\subseteq [G_i,G]\subseteq G_i^p$, soSince the Frattini subgroup of a nontrivial finite p-group is proper, this series eventually reaches $1$. Thus $P_j=G^{p^j}$, with iterated power subgroups, terminates.

The Nagao version of Brauer second main theorem is the following module statement. Let $e$ be a central idempotent of $kG$, let $P$ be a p-subgroup, and suppose $C_G(P)\le K\le N_G(P)$. If $eM=M$, put $b={\mathrm{Br}}_P(e)$, which is central in $kK$. Thenand every indecomposable summand of the second term has vertex not containing $P$. More precisely it is relatively projective for some $p$-subgroup of $K$ not containing $P$. In particular the vertex-$P$ Green correspondent lies in the block selected by the Brauer morphism. This is the precise restriction statement needed below.

Let $B$ have defect group of a block $D$, and let $b$ be its Brauer correspondent in $N=N_G(D)$. We first build a trivial-source module in $b$. The exact functoris nonzero on the trivial $kD$-module. Otherwise it would vanish on every $kD$-module, since a group algebra of a p-group in characteristic p is local and all composition factors are trivial; but $F(kD)=b\ne 0$. Choose an indecomposable summand $V$ of $F(k)$. Since $D◃N$, its restriction to $D$ is a nonzero direct sum of trivial modules. It is $D$-projective. It cannot have a proper vertex $Q<D$: restriction would make a trivial $D$-module relatively $Q$-projective, whereas on its endomorphisms the trace from $Q$ is multiplication by $[D:Q]=0$ in $k$, contrary to the D. Higman criterion. Hence $V$ has vertex $D$ and trivial source.

Take its Green correspondent $M$ in $G$. To verify that $M$ is in the intended block rather than just some block with a large defect, let $e^{\prime }$ be the global block idempotent acting on $M$. Nagao's theorem puts the vertex-$D$ summand $V$ of $M{\downarrow }_N$ in ${\mathrm{Br}}_D(e^{\prime })$. Thus $e_b{\mathrm{Br}}_D(e^{\prime })\ne 0$. The first main theorem already gives $e_b={\mathrm{Br}}_D(e_B)$; orthogonality of Brauer images of different global block idempotents forces $e^{\prime }=e_B$. Green correspondence preserves sources, so $B$ contains an indecomposable module with vertex $D$ and trivial source. The same argument proves the same-block compatibility of Green correspondence for every vertex-$D$ module used below.

For finite representation type, first suppose $D$ is cyclic of order $q$. Write $D=⟨g⟩$ and $t=g-1$. Then $kD\cong k[t]/(t^q)$, and the indecomposable modules for a cyclic p-group are $k[t]/(t^j)$, $1\le j\le q$, by Jordan normal form. Every indecomposable module in $B$ is $D$-projective by Question 1, so is a summand of an induction of one of these finitely many indecomposable $kD$-modules. Each induction has finitely many indecomposable summands. Therefore $B$ has finite representation type.

For the converse it is important to obtain infinitely many modules of full vertex $D$, and not silently assume that the field is infinite. If $D$ is noncyclic, its quotient by the Frattini subgroup is elementary abelian of rank at least two, so $D$ maps onto $C_p\times C_p$. A rank-one Frattini quotient would make any lift of its generator generate $D$, since every proper subgroup is contained in a maximal subgroup. Here is an explicit family of full-vertex modules for a noncyclic p-group valid over every field $k$. Set $x=g-1$, $y=h-1$ for the two quotient generators. Onput $x{v}_0=0$, $x{v}_i=w_i$ for $1\le i\le r$, $y{v}_i=w_{i+1}$ for $0\le i<r$, $y{v}_r=0$, and $x{w}_i=y{w}_i=0$. All products of $x,y$ are zero, so the relations $x^p=y^p=0$ and $xy=yx$ hold, including when $p=2$.

These modules are indecomposable. Their common kernel and radical are $W=⟨w_i⟩$. An endomorphism preserves $W$; let $A$ be its induced matrix on $L_r/W$ and $C$ its matrix on $W$. The equations $CX=XA$, $CY=YA$ for the two displayed shift maps force $A$ and $C$ to be the same scalar: the first and last columns give the boundary zeroes, and the recurrence $a_{j,i+1}=a_{j-1,i}$ forces all off-diagonal entries to vanish and all diagonal entries to agree. The remaining endomorphisms map the top into $W$ and vanish on $W$, so form a square-zero ideal. Thus the endomorphism ring is local. Inflate $L_r$ to $D$ and choose the infinitely many $r$ for which $p\nmid 2r+1$. Such an $L_r$ has vertex $D$: if $1={\mathrm{Tr}}_Q^D(\alpha )$ for a proper $Q<D$, taking ordinary matrix traces would givea contradiction. Their distinct dimensions ensure distinct isomorphism classes.

Each $F(L_r)=e_b{\mathrm{Ind}}_D^N{L}_r$ is nonzero, by exactness and the already proved $F(k)\ne 0$. Its restriction to $D$ is a summand of a sum of conjugates of $L_r$, by normality of $D$ and Mackey decomposition. Consequently every indecomposable summand chosen from $F(L_r)$ has vertex $D$, and has a source conjugate to $L_r$. If $b$ contained only finitely many indecomposables, their restrictions to $D$ would contain only finitely many possible sources, contradicting this family. Green correspondence and Nagao's theorem then transfer infinitely many vertex-$D$ indecomposables in $b$ to distinct indecomposables in $B$. We have proved

Finally, for $C_p=⟨g⟩$, the algebra $k{C}_p=k[t]/(t^p)$ has precisely the indecomposablesOn $M_j$, $g$ acts as a single size-$j$ Jordan block with eigenvalue $1$. Its submodules are exactly its ideals, hence the powers of $t$: an ideal has a generator of least degree, and multiplying that generator by a unit makes it a power of $t$. Therefore its unique composition series of a module iswith $j$ trivial one-dimensional composition factors. This is uniqueness of the actual chain, stronger than uniqueness of the multiset of factors. The algebra is local, so its sole principal indecomposable module is its regular module $M_p=k{C}_p$, of dimension and composition length $p$.

For a profinite group, its profinite Frattini subgroup isUse $G$ for an empty intersection. This is a closed normal subgroup, invariant under continuous group automorphisms, since these automorphisms permute the maximal open subgroups. Let $H=\overline{⟨X⟩}$. If $H=G$, its image certainly topologically generates $G/\Phi (G)$. Conversely, suppose $H\ne G$. For $g\notin H$, the open normal subgroup basis of a profinite group gives $N{⊴}_{o}G$ with $g\notin HN$: choose a sufficiently small neighbourhood $gN$ disjoint from the closed subgroup $H$. The proper subgroup $HN/N$ of the finite group $G/N$ lies in a maximal proper subgroup. Its preimage $M$ is a maximal proper open subgroup of $G$, contains $H$, and contains $\Phi (G)$. Since $H\Phi (G)$ is compact and therefore closed, density of the image of $X$ in $G/\Phi (G)$ would force $H\Phi (G)=G$, contradicting $H\Phi (G)\le M<G$. Generation can therefore be tested modulo the profinite Frattini subgroup.

For a finite p-group, every maximal proper subgroup is normal and has index $p$. One proof uses the normalizer condition for finite p-groups: maximality forces its normalizer to be the whole group, and its simple $p$-group quotient has order $p$. Therefore every such maximal subgroup contains powers and group commutators. Conversely, the quotient by the algebraic $G^p[G,G]$ is an elementary abelian p-group; its nonzero elements are separated by linear maps to ${\mathbb{F}}_p$. Their kernels give maximal subgroups. This proves the finite Frattini subgroup formula.

Now take a pro-p group and put $D=\overline{G^p[G,G]}$, retaining the closure of the algebraically generated subgroups. A maximal open subgroup is the preimage of a maximal subgroup of a finite $p$-group quotient, so it contains $D$. If $g\notin D$, some finite quotient of the profinite group $G/D$ detects $gD$. That quotient is elementary abelian, and a linear functional nonzero at $gD$ gives a continuous group homomorphism $G\to {\mathbb{F}}_p$ whose kernel is a maximal open subgroup missing $g$. HenceThe closure bar is present in the original PDF; the converted TeX fraction is an extraction error.

For the finite-index assertion, first pass from the arbitrary abstract subgroup $K$ to its normal core of a subgroup $C$. The action on the finitely many cosets of $K$ shows $[G:C]<\infty$, without assuming that $K$ or $C$ is closed. Write $m=[G:C]=p^{r}q$ with $(p,q)=1$, and let $X_m=\{h^m:h\in G\}$. By Lagrange theorem, $X_m\subseteq C$. For $N{⊴}_{o}G$, the quotient $G/N$ is a finite p-group of order, say, $p^s$. Choose an integer $a$ with $aq\equiv 1(\mathrm{mod}{p}^s)$. Thenso $g^{p^r}\in X_{m}N$ for every such $N$. The set $X_m$ is the continuous image of the compact space $G$, hence is closed. Consequently $g^{p^r}\in {\bigcap }_N{X}_{m}N=X_m\subseteq C$. Every element of the abstract finite quotient $G/C$ thus has order dividing $p^r$. By Cauchy theorem for groups, no prime other than $p$ divides its order. Therefore $[G:C]$, and its divisor $[G:K]$, are powers of $p$. This proof does not assume continuity of the finite quotient map.

To prove openness under finite generation, first establish commutator collection with fixed generators in nilpotent groups. If a nilpotent group $P$ is generated by $a_1,\dots ,a_d$, every element of $P\prime$ isInduct on the nilpotency class $c$. The assertion is trivial for $c=1$. Apply the induction hypothesis in $P/{\gamma }_c(P)$; the remaining error lies in the central subgroup ${\gamma }_c(P)=[{\gamma }_{c-1}(P),P]$. Since commutators in this last layer are central, collecting against words in the $a_i$ expresses the error as ${\prod }_i[y_i,a_i]$ with $y_i\in {\gamma }_{c-1}(P)$. Also $[P\prime ,{\gamma }_{c-1}(P)]\le {\gamma }_{c+1}(P)=1$. Thus replacing each $x_i$ by $x_i{y}_i$ multiplies the desired product by precisely that central error, proving the formula.

Let $a_1,\dots ,a_d$ now topologically generate $G$. Every finite continuous quotient is a nilpotent group, so the formula holds there with these fixed generators. For $z\in \overline{[G,G]}$, the sets of tuples $(x_1,\dots ,x_d)\in G^d$ solving $z\equiv {\prod }_i[x_i,a_i](\mathrm{mod}N)$ are nonempty closed subsets of a compact space. They have the finite intersection property, by replacing finitely many $N$ by their intersection. A common tuple solves the equality in $G$. It follows that the algebraic commutator subgroup is the compact image of $G^d$ under this product map, and is closed.

Its quotient $A=G/[G,G]$ is a topologically finitely generated abelian pro-p group. The continuous map ${\mathbb{Z}}_p^d\to A$ taking $({\lambda }_i)$ to ${\prod }_i{\bar{a}}_i^{{\lambda }_i}$ is onto, because its compact image contains a dense generating subgroup. Therefore $A/pA$ is generated as an elementary abelian group by at most $d$ elements, and $pA$ is compact. The preimage $G^p[G,G]$ of $pA$ is closed of finite index, hence open: its complement is a finite union of closed cosets. The finite-index result and the maximal-subgroup property of finite p-groups show that any abstract index-$p$ subgroup of $G$ is normal. It contains this open subgroup, so is itself open.

Finally, a finite-index normal subgroup $C$ has finite $p$-group quotient. If $[G:C]>1$, choose a normal index-$p$ subgroup in that quotient and call its preimage $H$. The preceding argument makes $H$ open. An open subgroup of a finitely generated pro-p group is finitely generated: intersect a finitely generated dense abstract subgroup with $H$, use the Schreier lemma, and observe that the intersection is dense in the open subgroup $H$. Induction on $[G:C]$ now makes $C$ open in $H$, hence in $G$. Returning to the normal core of a subgroup, $K$ is a union of open cosets of $C$. Every finite-index subgroup of a finitely generated pro-p group is open.

The powerfully embedded subgroup $N$ is itself a powerful p-group, so the finite Frattini subgroup formula gives $\Phi (N)=N^p$. Conjugation by $G$ acts trivially on $N/N^p$, because $[N,G]\le N^p$. Since $N$ is the normal closure of $X$, the image of $X$ therefore generates $N/N^p$: all conjugates have the same images as the original elements. The Burnside basis theorem now gives $N=⟨X⟩$. Equivalently, a proper generated subgroup would lie in a maximal subgroup of $N$, which contains $N^p$ and contradicts generation of that quotient.

Set $P_0=G$ and $P_{i+1}=P_i^p$. The permitted power-embedding result, applied repeatedly, gives $[P_i,G]\le P_{i+1}$, and each $P_i$ is a powerful p-group. These subgroups eventually reach $1$: if $P_i\ne 1$, its Frattini subgroup $P_i^p$ is proper. In fact these are the lower p-series layers, with their indices shifted by one.

For $x\in G$ and $y\in P_i$, the commutator $[y,x]$ lies in $P_{i+1}$, is central modulo $P_{i+2}$, and has exponent dividing $p$ there. The class-two collection calculation from part (iv) therefore givesApplying part (iv) inside $P_i$, whose third lower-series term is contained in $P_{i+2}$, shows that the map $y\mapsto y^p$ is onto $P_{i+1}/P_{i+2}$.

Given $a\in P_1$, first choose $x$ with $x^p\equiv a(\mathrm{mod}{P}_2)$. Suppose $x^p\equiv a(\mathrm{mod}{P}_{i+1})$. Choose $y\in P_i$ with $y^p\equiv x^{-p}a(\mathrm{mod}{P}_{i+2})$. The displayed collection congruence then gives $(xy{)}^p\equiv a(\mathrm{mod}{P}_{i+2})$. Replacing $x$ by $xy$ improves the approximation by one layer. Since the filtration on a group terminates, a finite sequence of corrections gives $x^p=a$ exactly. The reverse inclusion is the definition of $G^p$. Hence

For a finite group, define the Frattini subgroup bythe intersection is $G$ when there are no maximal subgroups, which for a finite group happens only for $G=1$. A second definition is the set of non-generators: an element $x$ such that $⟨S,x⟩=G$ always implies $⟨S⟩=G$.

If $x\in \Phi (G)$ and $H=⟨S⟩<G$, put $H$ in a maximal subgroup $M$. Then $x\in M$, so $⟨S,x⟩\le M<G$. Conversely, if $x\notin \Phi (G)$, some maximal subgroup $M$ omits it; maximality gives $⟨M,x⟩=G$, although $M\ne G$. This proves equivalence.

Every group automorphism permutes maximal subgroups, so $\Phi (G)$ is a characteristic subgroup, in particular a normal subgroup. Alsoa proper $H$ would lie in a maximal subgroup containing both factors.

Set $F=\Phi (G)$ and take a Sylow subgroup $P$ of $F$. For $g\in G$, normality of $F$ makes $P^g$ a Sylow subgroup of $F$. Conjugating inside $F$ therefore gives the Frattini argument factorization $G=F{N}_G(P)$. The preceding generating property forces $N_G(P)=G$. Thus every Sylow subgroup of $F$ is normal, and part (i) shows that $F$ is a nilpotent group.

Now suppose $G$ is a finite p-group. The normalizer condition makes every maximal subgroup $M$ normal: $M<N_G(M)$ and maximality force $N_G(M)=G$. The quotient $G/M$ has no proper nontrivial subgroup, hence is cyclic of prime order; its p-power order makes that prime $p$. Consequently every such $M$ containswhere the two factors are the commutator subgroup and the subgroup generated by pth powers. Thus $D\le \Phi (G)$.

The quotient $G/D$ is an elementary abelian group, hence a vector space over ${\mathbb{F}}_p$. If $x\notin D$, extend the nonzero vector $xD$ to a basis and choose a linear functional nonzero on it. Its kernel pulls back to a subgroup of index $p$, a maximal subgroup omitting $x$. Therefore $x\notin \Phi (G)$, provingThe two factors in the last formula are multiplied; the superscripted expression in the TeX aid is not the formula printed in the PDF.

A finite p-group is powerful if $[G,G]\le G^p$ for odd $p$, or $[G,G]\le G^4$ for $p=2$. Here powers denote generated subgroups. The same definition applies to pro-p groups using closed power and commutator subgroups. Its Frattini subgroup is $G^p$. For odd $p$, successive power layers admit linear correction of roots, which makes every element of $G^p$ an actual $p$th power.