Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 119 5 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
First supply the unlettered preliminaries. Assuming the relevant categorical limits and colimits exist, limits of shape commute with colimits of shape when for every functor the canonical mapis an isomorphism. To construct this map, for each compose the limiting projections with the th colimit injections. They form an -cone, giving a map into the right-hand categorical limit; these maps form a -cocone, giving the comparison. This specifies the actual comparison required for commutation of limits and colimits.
A group regarded as a one-object category has its group elements as arrows, with composition given by multiplication. A functor from it to the Category of sets is a group action. For a -set , a cone consists of a map into whose values are fixed by every . Hence its categorical limit is the set of fixed points of a group action. A cocone is a map out of constant on orbits of a group action; its universal quotient is the orbit set. Thus
A diagram in a category is a set with commuting group actions of and . Its limit–colimit comparison isCommutation makes stable under . The comparison is always injective: if two -fixed representatives are in the same -orbit in , they already determine the same orbit in .
For surjectivity under the finite coprime hypotheses, let be an -orbit fixed setwise by . Its size divides by the orbit-stabilizer theorem. Since the group actions commute and is transitive on , all -orbits inside have the same size : the bijection identifies the -orbits of and . Thus divides , while the orbit-stabilizer theorem also gives . The orders are coprime, so . Every point in is therefore -fixed, and lies in the image of . We have proved commutation of fixed points and orbit quotients for coprime groups:The bijection is the canonical comparison and is natural in the set with commuting group actions, so it proves the requested commutation of limits and colimits in the Category of sets.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 119 5 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Let and be the two quotient homomorphisms. On the underlying set , define the commuting group actionsThe inverse is essential for the right multiplication formula to define a left group action: . Left and right multiplication commute.
Because is onto and is nontrivial, there is no fixed point of a group action for : if every , cancellation would make every element of the identity. Thus . Because is onto, the -action is transitive and is a singleton. The induced -action on that singleton is trivial. Consequently the comparison iswhich is not an isomorphism. This proves the common quotient obstruction to commutation of fixed points and orbits, so limits of shape do not commute with colimits of shape in the Category of sets.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 ia Paper 3 5E Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-05
Restrict the quotient projection to . This is a group homomorphism withIts image is a nontrivial subgroup of the prime-order quotient group, because is not contained in . By Lagrange's theorem for finite groups, the image has order and is all of . The first isomorphism theorem for groups therefore gives
For the second assertion, partition into conjugacy classes for . Because is normal, conjugation by permutes these smaller classes: . This group action is transitive since any two elements of are conjugate in . Elements of fix every -class, so the action factors through .
If is the number of smaller classes, the orbit-stabilizer theorem for this transitive action gives . ThusDistinct conjugacy classes are disjoint because they are orbits of a group action. This proves conjugacy class splitting in a prime-index normal subgroup without assuming all -conjugations are already conjugations by .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 ia Paper 3 7E a Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-05
For a group action, the orbit of a group action of is , and its stabilizer subgroup is . The orbit-stabilizer theorem gives : the map is a well-defined bijection from stabilizer cosets to the orbit.
Within one orbit, the stabilizer subgroups are conjugate, since . Their sizes are therefore equal. Summing stabilizer sizes over a single orbit gives , and summing over all orbits yieldsNow count the pairs fixed by the action in two ways. Holding fixed gives choices of , whereas holding fixed gives choices of . ThusCombining the two identities proves Burnside lemma:The finiteness hypotheses justify these cardinality sums. If is empty, every sum and the orbit count are zero, so the formula still applies.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 ib Paper 1 10E b Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-05
A finite nonabelian simple group cannot be a p-group: a nontrivial finite p-group has nontrivial centre of a group, since its class equation makes every noncentral conjugacy class size divisible by , and hence makes the centre size a positive multiple of . That centre is a normal subgroup, so must be the whole group if is a simple group, making it abelian; an abelian simple group has prime order. Therefore every Sylow subgroup here is nontrivial and proper. It cannot be normal, so .
To obtain a simple group embedding from Sylow conjugation, the conjugation action on Sylow subgroups gives a group homomorphism . This group action is transitive by the Sylow theorems and is nontrivial since . Its kernel of a group homomorphism is a normal subgroup, so the defining property of a simple group makes the kernel of a group homomorphism trivial: is an embedding. Now compose with the sign of a permutation . A nontrivial composite would again be injective because is a simple group, embedding in a group of order two, impossible for a nonabelian group. Thus lies in the alternating group . By Lagrange's theorem,The argument only invokes the factorial formula once ; the impossible case itself is also excluded by the embedding.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 132 2 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
First use the nonzero loci, as required by the standard SL2R action on differentials. A nonzero holomorphic one-form has, away from its zeros, flat coordinateswhose changes of coordinate are translations. A nonzero holomorphic quadratic differential similarly has local flat coordinates , with and changes of coordinate . These are respectively translation surfaces and half-translation surfaces.
Identify a flat coordinate with a vector in . For , replace every flat coordinate by . Since preserves orientation and commutes with multiplication by , the new changes of coordinate areThey are holomorphic in the new coordinates, and so define a new complex structure. Define or in that structure. The forms glue because translations preserve , and the extra signs preserve .
The zeros also extend. A zero of order of a holomorphic one-form has cone angle ; a zero of order of a holomorphic quadratic differential has cone angle . The real-linear deformation preserves the corresponding winding multiplicity. Filling the cone in a local coordinate gives in the first case, or a local branch of in the second. Thus the resulting forms are constant multiples of or and have the same zero orders. This verifies extension across the missing points, rather than merely producing an atlas on the punctured surface.
An isomorphism preserving the original differential identifies its flat coordinates up to the permitted translations or signs; applying identifies the deformed atlases too. Hence the construction descends to the corresponding moduli spaces. Applying after replaces by , soThe area of a quadratic differential, and the analogous area of a holomorphic one-form, are preserved because .
For , the flat coordinates obtained from already give the required half-translation surface atlas for . The same replacement therefore constructs both deformations, and
The printed sets include identically zero differentials. They have no flat coordinates, so the customary geometric group action is defined on the nonzero loci. One can obtain a set-theoretic action on the displayed entire sets by declaring ; the same equivariance identity then holds at zero. This extension is generally not continuous: as , the deformed underlying surface is the same for every real , and can differ from . Thus a claim about the standard continuous geometric group action requires the nonzero convention.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 132 2 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
The analogous flat-coordinate construction does not define a full action on arbitrary cubic differentials. Away from zeros, a nonzero holomorphic cubic differential has flat coordinatesTheir changes of coordinate are with . A branch change is therefore a rotation through , not merely a sign. Applying a real-linear map changes its linear part to , where is that rotation. In general this is not a complex-linear map, so the proposed changes of coordinate are not holomorphic and cannot define the required deformed complex structure.
For example, take and with . Thenwhose off-diagonal entries fail the condition for a complex-linear map. This dependence on the choice of cube-root coordinate is the obstruction even when considering descent from the locus : the three possible roots need not lead to the same deformation of the cubic pair.
The real matrices preserving orientation that normalize the order-three rotations are precisely the matrices of complex-linear maps; intersecting with leaves . Indeed a nonreal rotation determines its complex structure, and conjugation to its inverse would reverse that structure's orientation. Thus there is a natural rotation action,The conclusion concerns the geometric group action analogous to that for translation surfaces and half-translation surfaces; it does not rule out artificial group actions unrelated to these atlases.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 ii Paper 4 18G a Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-05
Give the action , where is a row vector. Substitution preserves homogeneous degree, and composition agrees with matrix multiplication, so this is a complex representation of SU(2) group. The diagonal torus acts on with weight ; these weights are distinct.
A nonzero invariant subspace is invariant under the torus, so finite-dimensional Fourier projection onto its weight spaces supplies a nonzero monomial. Differentiating the group action and complexifying supplies the operators and . Their repeated application moves between every successive monomial, with nonzero coefficients until an endpoint is reached:The invariant subspace therefore contains the whole monomial basis. ThusFor this is the one-dimensional trivial representation. Torus weight projections are legitimate because an invariant complex subspace is closed in finite dimension.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2020 ib Paper 2 1G Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-03
Fix . If , then normality of givesThus the transitive group action of permutes the orbits of a group action of , so all -orbits have the same cardinality . They partition the prime-sized set , hence divides . The only possibilities are and . The first would make every element of fix every point, contrary to the assumption that acts nontrivially. Therefore and
Now suppose . Define the orbit mapIt is surjective by transitivity of . If , then , so ; hence is bijective. For ,Thus is an equivariant map: conjugation by on corresponds exactly to the given action of on .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2021 ib Paper 3 1G Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
Let act by left multiplication on the set of left cosets. This gives a group action homomorphismIts kernelis a normal subgroup of , and the first isomorphism theorem gives . By Lagrange's theorem, divides . The image acts transitively on the cosets, so the orbit-stabilizer theorem shows that divides ; in particular,
Now suppose is nonabelian and simple. Since is proper, the coset action is nontrivial, so . Simplicity gives , and embeds into . Composing with the sign homomorphism givesIts kernel is normal. A nontrivial map would embed the simple group into the abelian group of order two, which is impossible because is nonabelian. The sign is therefore always , so
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2022 ia Paper 3 5E Solution Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-25
A group action of on is a map such that and . The orbit and stabilizer of areFor a finite group, the mapis a well-defined bijection from the left cosets of to . Each coset has elements, so the orbit-stabilizer theorem is
The Cauchy theorem for groups says that if a prime number divides , then has an element of order . To prove it, letThe first entries determine the last, so , which is divisible by . The cyclic group acts on by cyclically rotating the entries; rotation preserves the product condition becauseEvery orbit has size one or . The fixed points are exactly the tuples with . Their number is therefore divisible by . Since the identity gives one fixed point, there is another, and its entry has order .
Now let . Cauchy's theorem gives a subgroup of order . Let act by the conjugation action on the set of subgroups of order . It fixes . If it also fixed , then would normalize ; since , the product would be a subgroup of order , which is impossible. Every other -orbit in therefore has size , soDistinct members of share only the identity and each contributes ten nonidentity elements. Hence , forcing . Thus is a normal subgroup.
Conjugation now defines a group homomorphismBecause , its automorphism group has order . By the Lagrange theorem, the image has order dividing both and , so the image is trivial and lies in the center of . Cauchy's theorem also supplies of order . If generates , then and commute and has order . Therefore
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2023 ib Paper 3 1E Solution Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-25
Fordefine its action on the projective line by the Möbius transformationwith the usual conventions when the denominator vanishes or . Matrix multiplication agrees with composition, so this is a group action. If fixes every projective point, then it fixes and , forcing , and fixing then gives . Thus the kernel consists exactly of the nonzero scalar matrices . The induced group homomorphismis therefore injective. This is the projective general linear group action on the projective line.
For ,The scalar subgroup has order , soThe four classes represented byform a subgroup of order four, hence a Sylow subgroup for the prime two. Its action is translation on and fixes . For , characteristic two makes this permutation a product of two disjoint transpositions on the four finite points. It is therefore even, andThis realizes the Sylow 2-subgroup of PGL2 over F4.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2025 iii Paper 324 1 a i Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
Let . The identity belongs to because . If , the group action law givesso . Finally, if , thenso . The subgroup criterion therefore proves that is the stabilizer subgroup of .
Properly discontinuous group action Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Rotational symmetry group of a cube Created 2026-10-05 Updated 2026-10-06
The orientation-preserving symmetries of a cube are the signed permutation matrices with determinant one. There are of them. Their group action on the four body diagonals identifies this group with the symmetric group . Indeed choose diagonal directions , whose sum is zero and whose only linear relation has all coefficients equal. A rotation fixing every diagonal sends each direction to itself or its negative; the relation forces all four signs equal. All negative would give , which has determinant , so the kernel of a group homomorphism is trivial. Both groups have order 24, giving the identification. Its face permutations have cycle types , , , and , occurring times respectively.
SL2R action on differentials 2026-10-05
For nonzero holomorphic one-forms and holomorphic quadratic differentials, apply to every flat coordinate. Translation and sign transition maps remain of the same type, defining a new complex structure and differential. Composition gives a group action, zero orders persist and area is preserved. The zero section has no such atlas; fixing it gives only a set-theoretic extension that is generally discontinuous.